The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescent Boys

Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Aggressive Behavior (Impact Factor: 2.28). 04/2006; 32(2):159-171. DOI: 10.1002/ab.20115
Source: PubMed


This study reports the development of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ), and the differential correlates of these two forms of aggression. Antisocial, psychosocial and personality measures were obtained at ages 7 and 16 years in schoolboys, while the RPQ was administered to 334 of the boys at age 16 years. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a significant fit for a two-factor proactive-reactive model that replicated from one independent subsample to another. Proactive aggression was uniquely characterized at age 7 by initiation of fights, strong-arm tactics, delinquency, poor school motivation, poor peer relationships, single-parent status, psychosocial adversity, substance-abusing parents, and hyperactivity, and at age 16 by a psychopathic personality, blunted affect, delinquency, and serious violent offending. Reactive aggression was uniquely characterized at age 16 by impulsivity, hostility, social anxiety, lack of close friends, unusual perceptual experiences, and ideas of reference. Findings confirm and extend the differential correlates of proactive-reactive aggression, and demonstrate that this brief but reliable and valid self-report instrument can be used to assess proactive and reactive aggression in child and adolescent samples.

349 Reads
  • Source
    • "The Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ) The RPQ (Raine et al. 2006 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study examined the factor structure, internal consistency and criterion validity of the Antisocial Process Screening Device-Self-Report (APSD-SR) in a large sample of Chinese community youth with an average age of 13.89 (SD = 1.27) years. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported a four factor solution (Impulsivity [IMP], Callous-Unemotional [CU], Narcissism [NAR], and Asocial behavior [ASO]). The internal consistencies of the APSD total scale and subscales were low to marginal, which were comparable with previous studies. Moreover, the APSD scores were related to criterion variables in ways consistent with predictions based on the new four-factor model. Our findings support the overall utility of the APSD-SR preliminarily for assessing antisocial behavior and psychopathic traits in Chinese community youth.
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 01/2016; DOI:10.1007/s10862-015-9486-x · 1.55 Impact Factor
    • "Aggression was measured by means of the Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ; Raine et al., 2006). The RPQ (Dutch version; Cima, Raine, Meesters, & Popma, 2013) is a self-report measure that includes 11 items that focus on reactive aggression (e.g., gotten angry when frustrated) and 12 items that focus on proactive aggression (e.g., had fights with others to show who was on top). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines the prevalence and clinical usefulness of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) specifier “with Limited Prosocial Emotions” (LPE) in detained girls. Detained girls (N = 85; Mage = 16.24) and their parents were interviewed with a structured diagnostic interview to identify girls with conduct disorder (CD), and both informants completed the Antisocial Process Screening Device to assess the LPE specifier. Psychiatric disorders other than CD, aggression, and offending were assessed through standardized self-report tools. Different approaches were used to deal with diagnostic information from multiple informants. The prevalence of CD + LPE girls was lower when using self-report (12.9%) compared with parent-report (38.8%), suggesting that parents indeed are important to identify CD + LPE girls. However, including parental information did not result in a better differentiation between CD + LPE and CD-only girls. Specifically, the LPE specifier only enabled to identify a group of seriously antisocial girls with higher levels of proactive aggression, though solely when using self-report.
    Criminal Justice and Behavior 11/2015; DOI:10.1177/0093854815613104 · 1.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Participants rated each item on a 3-point scale, with response options being 0 (never), 1 (sometimes), and 2 (always). In previous research (Raine et al., 2006), Cronbach's alphas were .86 and .84, respectively , for the proactive and reactive aggression subscales. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Poor executive function has been linked to increased antisocial and aggressive behavior in clinical and nonclinical populations. The present study investigated the relationship between executive and nonexecutive cognitive function and antisocial behavior in sport as well as reactive and proactive aggression. Cognitive function was assessed in young adult male and female athletes using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Antisocial behavior in sport and aggression were assessed via self-report instruments and were found to be positively correlated. Executive function (but not nonexecutive function) scores were negatively correlated with both self-reported antisocial behavior and aggression in males but not females. Our findings suggest that prefrontal deficits among male athletes could contribute to poor impulse control and difficulty in anticipating the consequences of their antisocial and aggressive behavior.
    Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 10/2015; 37(5):469 – 476. DOI:10.1123/jsep.2015-0021 · 2.59 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications