Molecular docking and 3D-QSAR CoMFA studies on indole inhibitors of GIIA secreted phospholipase A(2)

Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Athens 15771, Greece.
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Impact Factor: 3.74). 09/2010; 50(9):1589-601. DOI: 10.1021/ci100217k
Source: PubMed


Automated docking allowing a "protein-based" alignment was performed on a set of indole inhibitors of the GIIA secreted phospholipase A(2) (GIIA sPLA(2)). A correlation between the binding scores and the experimental inhibitory activity was observed (r(2) = 0.666, N = 34). All the indole inhibitors were docked in the active site of the GIIA sPLA(2) enzyme, and the best score docking pose of each inhibitor was used for the "protein-based" alignment of the compounds. A three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) model was then established using the comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) method. The set of 34 indole inhibitors was divided into two subsets: the training set, composed of 26 compounds, and the test set, consisting of eight compounds. The robustness and the predictive ability of the generated CoMFA model were examined by using the test set. A good correlation (r(2) = 0.997) between predicted and experimental inhibitory activity data allows the validation of the CoMFA model. Finally, the generated CoMFA model was used for the design and evaluation of new compounds. The new designed compounds exert improved predicted inhibitory activity and may be a target for the synthesis of new GIIA sPLA(2) indole inhibitors.

  • Source
    • "The protein–ligand crystal structures are shown in the Supplemental Fig. 2. The crystallographic structures found in the PDB were treated using the Protein Preparation wizard in Schrodinger Suite (http:// (Mouchlis et al., 2010). A grid for each protein was calculated with the Grid Generation module in Schrodinger Suite, with the binding site defined as the location of the respective cocrystallized ligands. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The thyroid hormone receptor (THR) is an important member of the nuclear receptor family that can be activated by endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC). Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models have been developed to facilitate the prioritization of THR-mediated EDC for the experimental validation. The largest database of binding affinities available at the time of the study for ligand binding domain (LBD) of THRβ was assembled to generate both continuous and classification QSAR models with an external accuracy of R2 = 0.55 and CCR = 0.76, respectively. In addition, for the first time a QSAR model was developed to predict binding affinities of antagonists inhibiting the interaction of coactivators with the AF-2 domain of THRβ (R2 = 0.70). Furthermore, molecular docking studies were performed for a set of THRβ ligands (57 agonists and 15 antagonists of LBD, 210 antagonists of the AF-2 domain, supplemented by putative decoys/non-binders) using several THRβ structures retrieved from the Protein Data Bank. We found that two agonist-bound THRβ conformations could effectively discriminate their corresponding ligands from presumed non-binders. Moreover, one of the agonist conformations could discriminate agonists from antagonists. Finally, we have conducted virtual screening of a chemical library compiled by the EPA as part of the Tox21 program to identify potential THRβ-mediated EDCs using both QSAR models and docking. We concluded that the library is unlikely to have any EDC that would bind to the THRβ. Models developed in this study can be employed either to identify environmental chemicals interacting with the THR or, conversely, to eliminate the THR-mediated mechanism of action for chemicals of concern.
    Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 10/2014; 280(1). DOI:10.1016/j.taap.2014.07.009 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, proteins are dynamically flexible macromolecules, and different structures of a protein may show different recognition abilities towards even the same ligand. Although ensemble docking has shown some advantages in improving the enrichment factor or diversity22,23, to our knowledge, all docking-based 3D-QSAR studies still use a single crystal structure for ligand pose prediction17,24,25. However, the recognition ability of a protein structure towards inhibitors with different chemical types is rarely explored. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: To develop a novel 3D-QSAR approach for study of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR TK) and its inhibitors. Methods: One hundred thirty nine EGFR TK inhibitors were classified into 3 clusters. Ensemble docking of these inhibitors with 19 EGFR TK crystal structures was performed. Three protein structures that showed the best recognition of each cluster were selected based on the docking results. Then, a novel QSAR (ensemble-QSAR) building method was developed based on the ligand conformations determined by the corresponding protein structures. Results: Compared with the 3D-QSAR model, in which the ligand conformations were determined by a single protein structure, ensemble-QSAR exhibited higher R2 (0.87) and Q2 (0.78) values and thus appeared to be a more reliable and better predictive model. Ensemble-QSAR was also able to more accurately describe the interactions between the target and the ligands. Conclusion: The novel ensemble-QSAR model built in this study outperforms the traditional 3D-QSAR model in rationality, and provides a good example of selecting suitable protein structures for docking prediction and for building structure-based QSAR using available protein structures.
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 12/2013; 35(5):301-310. DOI:10.1038/aps.2013.148 · 2.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The protein-ligand crystal structures are shown in Supplemental Figure 1. Protein structures were prepared using Protein Preparation wizard (Protein Preparation Wizard, 2011) by following the protocols in (Mouchlis et al., 2010). A grid for each protein was calculated using Grid Generation in Maestro (Maestro 2011), with the binding site defined by the location of co-crystallized ligands. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identification of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals is one of the important goals of environmental chemical hazard screening. We report on the development of validated in silico predictors of chemicals likely to cause Estrogen Receptor (ER)-mediated endocrine disruption to facilitate their prioritization for future screening. A database of relative binding affinity of a large number of ERα and/or ERβ ligands was assembled (546 for ERα and 137 for ERβ). Both single-task learning (STL) and multi-task learning (MTL) continuous Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) models were developed for predicting ligand binding affinity to ERα or ERβ. High predictive accuracy was achieved for ERα binding affinity (MTL R(2)=0.71, STL R(2)=0.73). For ERβ binding affinity, MTL models were significantly more predictive (R(2)=0.53, p<0.05) than STL models. In addition, docking studies were performed on a set of ER agonists/antagonists (67 agonists and 39 antagonists for ERα, 48 agonists and 32 antagonists for ERβ, supplemented by putative decoys/non-binders) using the following ER structures (in complexes with respective ligands) retrieved from the Protein Data Bank: ERα agonist (PDB ID: 1L2I), ERα antagonist (PDB ID: 3DT3), ERβ agonist (PDB ID: 2NV7), ERβ antagonist (PDB ID: 1L2J). We found that all four ER conformations discriminated their corresponding ligands from presumed non-binders. Finally, both QSAR models and ER structures were employed in parallel to virtually screen several large libraries of environmental chemicals to derive a ligand- and structure-based prioritized list of putative estrogenic compounds to be used for in vitro and in vivo experimental validation.
    Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 05/2013; 272(1). DOI:10.1016/j.taap.2013.04.032 · 3.71 Impact Factor
Show more