Article

Aspirin and Compression Devices Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and PCD for VTE Prophylaxis in Orthopedic Oncology Patients

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Journal of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 2.84). 09/2010; 102(3):276-81. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21603
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are possible sources of morbidity and mortality in patients with musculoskeletal neoplasms (MSN).
To compare the efficacy of aspirin (ASA) and pneumatic compression devices (PCD) to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and PCD in patients undergoing orthopedic procedures for MSN of the pelvis or lower extremity.
Of 348 patients who met the study criteria, 195 were treated with ASA/PCD and 153 with LMWH/PCD. There were 18 DVT including 8 in ASA/PCD group and 10 in LMWH/PCD group. There were four PEs, all in the LMWH/PCD group.
We found no significant difference in DVT rate between ASA/PCD and LMWH/PCD when used for prophylaxis against thromboembolic complications. Our analysis shows that procedures of the thigh, soft tissue resections, and malignant disease were more often managed with ASA/PCD while joint arthroplasty, procedures of the hip/pelvis, and metastatic disease were more often managed with LMWH/PCD.
DVT prophylaxis in orthopedic oncology remains a complex topic in which physicians must balance the risks of thromboembolic disease against the risks of post-operative complications.

1 Bookmark
 · 
69 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUÇÃO: A abdominoplastia é uma das cirurgias estéticas mais realizadas e, como qualquer outro ato cirúrgico, está sujeita a inúmeras complicações, entre as quais os fenômenos tromboembólicos. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a incidência de complicações em uma série consecutiva de abdominoplastias, fatores de risco e a eficácia de dois protocolos de prevenção para tromboembolia. MÉTODO: Estudo retrospectivo de 563 abdominoplastias, isoladas ou não, realizadas entre março de 2008 e abril de 2011, que receberam dois protocolos de profilaxia de tromboembolismo diferentes: o farmacológico, com emprego de enoxaparina (357 pacientes), e o mecânico, com compressão pneumática intermitente (206 pacientes). RESULTADOS: Dentre os 563 pacientes, 4 (0,7%) eram do sexo masculino (0,7%) e 559 (99,3%), do sexo feminino. Foram submetidos a abdominoplastia isolada 201 (35,7%) pacientes, enquanto 362 (64,3%) foram submetidos a abdominoplastia associada a algum outro procedimento. Os grupos com profilaxia farmacológica e mecânica tinham fatores de risco e características demográficas e clínicas semelhantes. A incidência de complicações no grupo farmacológico em relação ao grupo mecânico foi de: hematoma, 5,6% e 10,7%; infecção, 2,2% e 2,4%; deiscência, 3,1% e 1,9%; seroma, 2,2% e 2,4%; e trombose venosa profunda/tromboembolia pulmonar, 0,6% e 0,5%. Nenhuma complicação apresentou diferença estatística significante entre os grupos. CONCLUSÕES: A taxa de complicações em 563 casos consecutivos de abdominoplastia foi semelhante à da literatura. A eficácia da profilaxia tromboembólica em abdominoplastia é a mesma observada com a utilização de métodos farmacológicos e mecânicos isoladamente.
    03/2012; 27(1):77-86. DOI:10.1590/S1983-51752012000100013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the incidence, risk factors, and optimal prophylaxis in orthopaedic oncology patients, although malignancy and major orthopaedic surgery are associated with an increased pulmonary embolism (PE) risk. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We aimed to investigate the incidence of PE after musculoskeletal tumor surgery in Japanese patients and analyze the potential risk factors for PE. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 3750 patients (1981 males, 1769 females) who underwent musculoskeletal tumor surgery during 2007 to 2010 using the Japanese Diagnostic Procedure Combination administrative database. Data collected included sex, age, primary diagnosis, type of surgery, duration of anesthesia, and comorbidities that may affect PE incidence. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship of each factor with PE occurrence. RESULTS: We identified 10 patients with PE during the survey period. A primary malignant bone tumor was associated with a significantly higher risk of PE than a primary malignant soft tissue tumor (odds ratio [OR], 5.58; 95% CI, 1.39-22.42). Bone tumor resection (OR, 7.94; 95% CI, 1.77-35.59) and prosthetic reconstruction (OR, 9.15; 95% CI, 1.52-55.07) were associated with a significantly higher risk of PE than soft tissue tumor resection. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant bone tumors and bone tumor resections have a higher risk of PE than malignant soft tissue neoplasms and soft tissue resections. Both populations might require PE prophylaxis as it is likely that the risk is greater than with other major orthopaedic surgery, but data accumulation should continue, and further investigation should be done to clarify details of the incidence, risk factors, and optimal prophylaxis for PE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 05/2013; 471(10). DOI:10.1007/s11999-013-3073-9 · 2.79 Impact Factor
  • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 06/2013; 471(10). DOI:10.1007/s11999-013-3112-6 · 2.79 Impact Factor