Article

Length of Stay for Older Adults Residing in Nursing Homes at the End of Life

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 09/2010; 58(9):1701-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03005.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe lengths of stay of nursing home decedents.
Retrospective cohort study.
The Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults aged 50 and older.
One thousand eight hundred seventeen nursing home residents who died between 1992 and 2006.
The primary outcome was length of stay, defined as the number of months between nursing home admission and date of death. Covariates were demographic, social, and clinical factors drawn from the HRS interview conducted closest to the date of nursing home admission.
The mean age of decedents was 83.3 ± 9.0; 59.1% were female, and 81.5% were white. Median and mean length of stay before death were 5 months (interquartile range 1-20) and 13.7 ± 18.4 months, respectively. Fifty-three percent died within 6 months of placement. Large differences in median length of stay were observed according to sex (men, 3 months vs women, 8 months) and net worth (highest quartile, 3 months vs lowest quartile, 9 months) (all P <.001). These differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, marital status, net worth, geographic region, and diagnosed chronic conditions (cancer, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, lung disease, heart disease, and stroke).
Nursing home lengths of stay are brief for the majority of decedents. Lengths of stay varied markedly according to factors related to social support.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John Boscardin, Feb 17, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
181 Views
  • Source
    • "Dual-eligible beneficiaries are more likely to live alone (Howell et al. 2007; Cai, Salmon, and Rodgers 2009; Martikainen et al. 2009; Kelly et al. 2010) and have lower socio-economic status (Martikainen et al. 2009), lower household's net worth (Kelly et al. 2010), higher dissatisfaction with living conditions at home (Howell et al. 2007), and lower rates of home ownership (Cai, Salmon, and Rodgers 2009). Third, dual eligibles are more likely to have poorer health status (Howell et al. 2007; Cai, Salmon, and Rodgers 2009; Martikainen et al. 2009; Kelly et al. 2010). Such difference in health status is likely to contribute to the difference in nursing home length of stay. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To examine outcomes associated with dual eligibility (Medicare and Medicaid) of patients who are admitted to skilled nursing facility (SNF) care and whether differences in outcomes are related to states' Medicaid long-term care policies.Data Sources/CollectionWe used national Medicare enrollment data and claims, and the Minimum Data Set for 890,922 community-residing Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were discharged to an SNF from a general hospital between July 2008 and June 2009.Study DesignWe estimated the effect of dual eligibility on the likelihood of 30-day rehospitalization, becoming a long-stay nursing home resident, and 180-day survival while controlling for clinical, demographic, socio-economic, residential neighborhood characteristics, and SNF-fixed effects. We estimated the differences in outcomes by dual eligibility status separately for each state and showed their relationship with state policies: the average Medicaid payment rate; presence of nursing home certificate-of-need (CON) laws; and Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) spending.Principal FindingsDual-eligible patients are equally likely to experience 30-day rehospitalization, 12 percentage points more likely to become long-stay residents, and 2 percentage points more likely to survive 180 days compared to Medicare-only patients. This longer survival can be attributed to longer nursing home length of stay. While higher HCBS spending reduces the length-of-stay gap without affecting the survival gap, presence of CON laws reduces both the length-of-stay and survival gaps.Conclusions Dual eligibles utilize more SNF care and experience higher survival rates than comparable Medicare-only patients. Higher HCBS spending may reduce the longer SNF length of stay of dual eligibles without increasing mortality and may save money for both Medicare and Medicaid.
    Health Services Research 07/2014; 50(1). DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12204 · 2.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Second, dual eligibility is highly correlated with the factors that are documented to prolong nursing home length of stay. Such factors include living alone (Cai, Salmon, & Rodgers, 2009; Howell, Silberberg, Quinn, & Lucas, 2007; Kelly et al., 2010; Martikainen et al., 2009), low socioeconomic status (Martikainen et al., 2009), lower household's net worth (Kelly et al., 2010), dissatisfaction with living conditions at home (Howell et al., 2007), and lower rates of home ownership (Cai et al., 2009). Thus, quality of living at nursing home relative to that in community is higher for dual-eligibles than for Medicare-only patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medicare and Medicaid dual-eligible beneficiaries use more medical care and experience worse health outcomes than Medicare-only beneficiaries. This article points to a possible inefficiency in the skilled nursing facility (SNF) admission process, specifically that patients and SNFs are partially matched based on dual-eligibility status, and investigates its influence on patients' SNF length of stay. Using a set of fee-for-service beneficiaries newly admitted for Medicare-paid SNF care, we document two findings: (1) compared with Medicare-only patients, dual-eligibles are more likely to be discharged to SNFs with low nurse-to-patient ratios and (2) dual-eligibles are more likely to become long-stay nursing home residents than Medicare-only beneficiaries if treated in SNFs with low nurse-to-patient ratios. We conclude that changes in the current SNF care referral process have the potential to reduce excess SNF utilization by dual-eligible beneficiaries and could help reduce spending by both Medicare and Medicaid.
    Medical Care Research and Review 05/2014; 71(4). DOI:10.1177/1077558714533824 · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a need to improve the quality of end-of-life care in nursing homes by improving the timely assessment and management of various sources of suffering. Much of the research/discussion in this area has focused on the assessment and treatment of pain. This article reviews the frequency and management of nonpain symptoms in the long-term care setting, particularly focusing on patients at the end of life. Although the long-term care setting presents challenges to effective management, an approach for addressing these challenges is discussed and applied to 3 commonly encountered nonpain symptoms.
    Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 05/2011; 27(2):213-28. DOI:10.1016/j.cger.2011.01.006 · 3.19 Impact Factor
Show more