Article

# Induced chiral Dirac fermions in graphene by a periodically modulated magnetic field

(Impact Factor: 3.66). 12/2009; 81(12). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.125424
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT

The effect of a modulated magnetic field on the electronic structure of neutral graphene is examined in this paper. It is found that application of a small staggered modulated magnetic field does not destroy the Dirac-cone structure of graphene and so preserves its 4-fold zero-energy degeneracy. The original Dirac points (DPs) are just shifted to other positions in k space. By varying the staggered field gradually, new DPs with exactly the same electron-hole crossing energy as that of the original DPs, are generated, and both the new and original DPs are moving continuously. Once two DPs are shifted to the same position, they annihilate each other and vanish. The process of generation and evolution of these DPs with the staggered field is found to have a very interesting patten, which is examined carefully. Generally, there exists a corresponding branch of anisotropic massless fermions for each pair of DPs, resulting in that each Landau level (LL) is still 4-fold degenerate except the zeroth LL which has a robust $4n_t$-fold degeneracy with nt the number of pairs of DPs. As a result, the Hall conductivity $\sigma_{xy}$ shows a step of size $4n_te^2/h$ across zero energy. Comment: 6 pages, 6 figures

### Full-text

Available from: Jin An,
• Source
##### Article: Edge States and Quantum Hall Effect in Graphene under a Modulated Magnetic Field
[Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Graphene properties can be manipulated by a periodic potential. Based on the tight-binding model, we study graphene under a one-dimensional (1D) modulated magnetic field which contains both a uniform and a staggered component. New chiral current-carrying edge states are generated at the interfaces where the staggered component changes direction. These edge states lead to an unusual integer quantum Hall effect (QHE) in graphene, which can be observed experimentally by a standard four-terminal Hall measurement. When Zeeman spin splitting is considered, a novel state is predicted where the electron edge currents with opposite polarization propagate in the opposite directions at one sample boundary, whereas propagate in the same directions at the other sample boundary.
Physical review. B, Condensed matter 12/2009; 82(15). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.155421 · 3.66 Impact Factor
• Source
##### Article: Magnetic superlattice and finite-energy Dirac points in graphene
[Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We study the band structure of graphene's Dirac-Weyl quasi-particles in a one-dimensional magnetic superlattice formed by a periodic sequence of alternating magnetic barriers. The spectrum and the nature of the states strongly depend on the conserved longitudinal momentum and on the barrier width. At the center of the superlattice Brillouin zone we find new Dirac points at finite energies where the dispersion is highly anisotropic, in contrast to the dispersion close to the neutrality point which remains isotropic. This finding suggests the possibility of collimating Dirac-Weyl quasi-particles by tuning the doping.
Physical review. B, Condensed matter 01/2011; 83(15). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.155449 · 3.66 Impact Factor
• ##### Article: Gap opening and tuning in single-layer graphene with combined electric and magnetic field modulation
[Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The energy band structure of single-layer graphene under one-dimensional electric and magnetic field modulation is theoretically investigated. The criterion for bandgap opening at the Dirac point is analytically derived with a two-fold degeneracy second-order perturbation method. It is shown that a direct or an indirect bandgap semiconductor could be realized in a single-layer graphene under some specific configurations of the electric and magnetic field arrangement. Due to the bandgap generated in the single-layer graphene, the Klein tunneling observed in pristine graphene is completely suppressed.
Chinese Physics B 04/2011; 20(4):047302. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/20/4/047302 · 1.60 Impact Factor