Constraining Light Gravitino Mass from Cosmic Microwave Background

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (Impact Factor: 5.88). 05/2009; DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/08/013
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT We investigate the possibilities of constraining the light gravitino mass m_{3/2} from future cosmic microwave background (CMB) surveys. A model with light gravitino with the mass m_{3/2}<O(10) eV is of great interest since it is free from the cosmological gravitino problem and, in addition, can be compatible with many baryogenesis/leptogenesis scenarios such as the thermal leptogenesis. We show that the lensing of CMB anisotropies can be a good probe for m_{3/2} and obtain an expected constraint on m_{3/2} from precise measurements of lensing potential in the future CMB surveys, such as the PolarBeaR and CMBpol experiments. If the gravitino mass is m_{3/2}=1 eV, we will obtain the constraint for the gravitino mass as m_{3/2} < 3.2 eV (95% C.L.) for the case with Planck+PolarBeaR combined and m_{3/2}=1.04^{+0.22}_{-0.26} eV (68% C.L.) for CMBpol. The issue of Bayesian model selection is also discussed. Comment: 22 pages, 6 figures, 7 tables, references are added, accepted for publication in JCAP

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We propose an extended version of the gauge-mediated SUSY breaking models where extra SUL(2) doublets and singlet field are introduced. These fields are assumed to be parity-odd under an additional matter parity. In this model, the lightest parity-odd particle among them would be dark matter in the Universe. In this Letter, we discuss direct detection of the dark matter and the collider signatures of the model.
    Physics Letters B 03/2010; · 6.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent cosmological observations, such as the measurement of the primordial 4He abundance, CMB, and large scale structure, give preference to the existence of extra radiation component, ΔNν>0. The extra radiation may be accounted for by particles which were in thermal equilibrium and decoupled before the big bang nucleosynthesis. Broadly speaking, there are two possibilities: (1) there are about 10 particles which have very weak couplings to the standard model particles and decoupled much before the QCD phase transition; (2) there is one or a few light particles with a reasonably strong coupling to the plasma and it decouples after the QCD phase transition. Focusing on the latter case, we find that a light chiral fermion is a suitable candidate, which evades astrophysical constraints. Interestingly, our scenario predicts a new gauge symmetry at TeV scale, and therefore may be confirmed at the LHC. As a concrete example, we show that such a light fermion naturally appears in the E6-inspired GUT.
    Physics Letters B 10/2010; · 6.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We study a U(1)R-symmetric extension of the supersymmetric standard model with supersymmetry breaking in the visible as well as hidden sectors. Specifically, we study U(1)R-breaking effects parameterized by the gravitino mass. A special R-charge assignment of right-handed neutrinos allows us to have neutrino Yukawa couplings with the R-charged Higgs field, which develops a tiny vacuum expectation value after the inclusion of U(1)R-symmetry breaking. Even with O(1) Yukawa couplings, a suitable size of Dirac neutrino mass can be generated if the gravitino mass is very small, m3/2 = 1-10 eV. Our flipped R-charge assignment also allows a new type of dimension-five operator that can induce proton decay. It turns out that the proton stability mildly constrains the allowed range of the gravitino mass: A gravitino heavier than 10 keV can evade the proton decay constraint as well as cosmological ones. In this case, the largest neutrino Yukawa coupling is comparable to the electron Yukawa. We also calculate the mass of the pseudo goldstino and its mixing with neutralinos, and briefly discuss its implications in cosmology and Higgs phenomenology.
    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics. 05/2013; 2013(5).

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014