Article

Massachusetts Health Reform and Disparities in Coverage, Access and Health Status

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 12/2010; 25(12):1356-62. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1482-y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Massachusetts health reform has achieved near-universal insurance coverage, yet little is known about the effects of this legislation on disparities.
Since racial/ethnic minorities and low-income individuals are over-represented among the uninsured, we assessed the effects of health reform on disparities.
Cross-sectional survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), 2006-2008.
Adults from Massachusetts (n = 36,505) and other New England states (n = 63,263).
Self-reported health coverage, inability to obtain care due to cost, access to a personal doctor, and health status. To control for trends unrelated to reform, we compared adults in Massachusetts to those in all other New England states using multivariate logistic regression models to calculate adjusted predicted probabilities.
Overall, the adjusted predicted probability of health coverage in Massachusetts rose from 94.7% in 2006 to 97.7% in 2008, whereas coverage in New England remained around 92% (p < 0.001 for difference-in-difference). While cost-related barriers were reduced in Massachusetts, there were no improvements in access to a personal doctor or health status. Although there were improvements in coverage and cost-related barriers for some disadvantaged groups relative to trends in New England, there was no narrowing of disparities in large part because of comparable or larger improvements among whites and the non-poor.
Achieving equity in health and health care may require additional focused intervention beyond health reform.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jennifer S Haas, Oct 24, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
114 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper will describe ongoing efforts to further the development and implementation of Common Channel Signaling (CCS) in the Defense Switched Network (DSN). The common channel signaling system to be employed is based upon CCITT Signaling System No. 7. One goal for this task is to utilize, where practical, information on how Signaling System No. 7 is evolving and its anticipated impact upon the DSN. Specific objectives include determining the optimum strategy for implementation ofcommon channel signaling in the DSN, and providing the basis for determining a final Signaling System No. 7 specification for the DSN. The progress to date on the prospects to include DSN requirements as part of an officially approved North American standard on common channel signaling is also reported.
    Military Communications Conference, 1985. MILCOM 1985. IEEE; 11/1985
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In September, 2010 the US Census Bureau announced the number of uninsured persons in the USA had risen to the highest ever recorded at 50.7 million. How much of a dent the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111148, PPACA, commonly known as national health insurance reform) will make on this crisis remains an ongoing question. While modeling estimates suggest that up to 32 million may gain coverage, many look to the Massachusetts health reform efforts begun in 2006 as a more real world experience of what may actually happen at the national level. Similarities between both plans include Medicaid expansions, subsidies for low income persons to obtain private coverage, business tax credits, individual and business mandates. Analyses using distinct datasets have shown that after the Massachusetts law was enacted, coverage in the state increased by approximately
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2010; 25(12):1266-7. DOI:10.1007/s11606-010-1535-2
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) has been controversial. The potential impact of national healthcare reform may be considered using a similar set of state-level reforms including exchanges and a mandate, enacted in 2006 in Massachusetts. To evaluate the effects of reforms on healthcare access, affordability, and disparities. Interrupted time series with comparison series. Longitudinal survey data from 2002 to 2009 from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System including 178,040 nonelderly adults residing in Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Connecticut. Analysis was conducted from January to August 2010. Massachusetts 2006 healthcare reform, which included an individual health insurance mandate. Being uninsured, having no personal doctor, and forgoing care because of cost, evaluated in Massachusetts and four comparison states before (2002-2005) and after (2007-2009) the healthcare reform. Effects on disparities defined by race, education, income, and employment also were assessed. Living in Massachusetts in 2009 was associated with a 7.6 percentage point (95% CI=3.9, 11.3) higher probability of being insured; 4.8 percentage point (-0.9, 10.6) lower probability of forgoing care because of cost; and a 6.6 percentage point (1.9, 11.3) higher probability of having a personal doctor, compared to expected levels in the absence of reform, defined by trends in control states and adjusting for socioeconomic factors. The effects of the reform on insurance coverage attenuated from 2008 to 2009. In a socioeconomically disadvantaged group, the reforms had a greater effect in improving outcomes on the absolute but not relative scale. Healthcare reforms in Massachusetts, which included a health insurance mandate, were associated with significant increases in insurance coverage and access. The absolute effects of the reform were greater for disadvantaged populations. This is important evidence to consider as debate over national healthcare reform continues.
    American journal of preventive medicine 07/2011; 41(1):1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.010