Article

beta(2)-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling in the Cardiac Myocyte is Modulated by Interactions With CXCR4

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Research Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology (Impact Factor: 2.11). 11/2010; 56(5):548-59. DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181f713fe
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Chemokines are small secreted proteins with chemoattractant properties that play a key role in inflammation, metastasis, and embryonic development. We previously demonstrated a nonchemotactic role for one such chemokine pair, stromal cell-derived factor-1α and its G-protein coupled receptor, CXCR4. Stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 are expressed on cardiac myocytes and have direct consequences on cardiac myocyte physiology by inhibiting contractility in response to the nonselective β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) agonist, isoproterenol. As a result of the importance of β-adrenergic signaling in heart failure pathophysiology, we investigated the underlying mechanism involved in CXCR4 modulation of βAR signaling. Our studies demonstrate activation of CXCR4 by stromal cell-derived factor-1 leads to a decrease in βAR-induced PKA activity as assessed by cAMP accumulation and PKA-dependent phosphorylation of phospholamban, an inhibitor of SERCA2a. We determined CXCR4 regulation of βAR downstream targets is β2AR-dependent. We demonstrated a physical interaction between CXCR4 and β2AR as determined by coimmunoprecipitation, confocal microscopy, and BRET techniques. The CXCR4-β2AR interaction leads to G-protein signal modulation and suggests the interaction is a novel mechanism for regulating cardiac myocyte contractility. Chemokines are physiologically and developmentally relevant to myocardial biology and represent a novel receptor class of cardiac modulators. The CXCR4-β2AR complex could represent a hitherto unknown target for therapeutic intervention.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sima Tarzami, Aug 15, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
154 Views
  • Source
    • "These results describe that the cardioprotection elicited by CXCR4 may employ multiple mechanisms including regulation of LTCC function, calcium homeostasis and VEGF regulation. Previously we reported that CXCR4 prevents isoproterenol induced diastolic Ca 2+ overload and influences downstream β-AR signaling in isolated cardiac myocytes [5]. Here we have shown that CXCR4 may Table 1 Echocardiography: two-dimensional images and M-mode tracings were recorded on the short-axis at the level of the papillary muscle to determine percent fractional shortening and ventricular dimension. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stem cell and gene therapies are being pursued as strategies for repairing damaged cardiac tissue following myocardial infarction in an attempt to prevent heart failure. The chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) and its ligand, CXCL12, play a critical role in stem cell recruitment post-acute myocardial infarction. Whereas progenitor cell migration via the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is well characterized, little is known about the molecular mechanisms of CXCR4 mediated modulation of cardiac hypertrophy and failure. We used gene therapy to test the effects of CXCR4 gene delivery on adverse ventricular remodeling due to pressure overload. We assessed the effect of cardiac overexpression of CXCR4 during trans-aortic constriction (TAC) using a cardiotropic adeno-associated viral vector (AAV9) carrying the CXCR4 gene. Cardiac overexpression of CXCR4 in mice with pressure overload prevented ventricular remodeling, preserved capillary density and maintained function as determined by echocardiography and in vivo hemodynamics. In isolated adult rat cardiac myocytes, CXCL12 treatment prevented isoproterenol induced hypertrophy and interrupted the calcineurin/NFAT pathway. Finally, a complex involving the L-type calcium channel, β2-adrenoceptor, and CXCR4 (Cav1.2/β2AR/CXCR4) was identified in healthy cardiac myocytes and was shown to dissociate as a consequence of heart failure. CXCR4 administered to the heart via gene transfer prevents pressure overload induced heart failure. The identification of CXCR4 participation in a Cav1.2-β2AR regulatory complex provides further insight into the mechanism by which CXCR4 modulates calcium homeostasis and chronic pressure overload responses in the cardiac myocyte. Together these results suggest that AAV9.CXCR4 gene therapy is a potential therapeutic approach for congestive heart failure.
    Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 06/2012; 53(2):223-32. DOI:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.05.016 · 5.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heart disease is not only the leading cause of death, disability, and healthcare expense in the US, but also the leading cause of death worldwide. Therefore, treatments to lessen ischemia-related cardiac damage could affect a broad swath of the population and have significant health and fiscal impacts. Cardiac dysfunction has been associated with elevated circulating chemokine levels, both in animals and humans. Most studies in this area have focused on chemokine expression as a prominent feature of the post-infarction inflammatory response. Such studies have investigated the role of chemokines in inflammatory leukocyte recruitment. Other work on this topic has focused on stem-cell therapy or factors e.g. chemokines mobilizing bone marrow progenitor cells as possible avenues for improving contractile dysfunction. Findings from numerous preclinical studies and several initial clinical trials support the feasibility of promoting the recruitment of bone marrow-derived cells to the infarcted heart and increased homing following injury, supporting the notion that cell therapy might have therapeutic potential. They have not, however, addressed the possibility of an autocrine/paracrine effect wherein the chemokine receptors, present on the cardiac myocyte surface, modulate functional responses to stress in which can be adaptive or maladaptive in nature.
    International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 01/2011; 4(1):74-80. · 1.42 Impact Factor
Show more