Streetworkers, youth violence prevention, and peacemaking in Lowell, Massachusetts: lessons and voices from the community.

The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Injury Research and Policy, USA.
Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action 01/2010; 4(3):171-9. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Communities across the United States are using street outreach workers (SWs) to prevent violence. SW programs are generally recognized as a promising model, particularly in light of a 2008 evaluation that demonstrated positive impacts associated with one well-known program. The United Teen Equality Center (UTEC) includes an SW program.
Through this paper we aim to (1) document the work of the UTEC SWs, (2) describe UTEC's approach to training SWs and managing the program, and (3) understand interviewees' perspectives (including UTEC managers, SWs and partners) on how the SWs impact youth violence in Lowell.
We designed a single-site observational study using qualitative methods to address our study aims. We collected data from in-person, semistructured interviews with the two UTEC SW program managers, the six SWs employed during the study period, and 17 representatives from partner agencies.
UTEC SWs outreach to youth, respond to crises in the lives of youth as opportunity, work to facilitate access to resources for youth, and engage in intensive follow-up with youth when needed. These findings are consistent with UTEC's pyramid model of SW outreach. The program emphasizes peacemaking (not only preventing violence) and partnerships as priorities. SWs participate in structured training, receive a comprehensive benefits package, and have opportunities for professional development.
Several aspects of UTEC's program may be useful for other SW programs: Involve youth in hiring SWs, invest in SW training, incorporate peacemaking strategies into outreach, and partner with agencies that also serve youth.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cities are increasingly adopting CeaseFire, an evidence-based public health program that uses specialized outreach workers, called violence interrupters (VIs), to mediate potentially violent conflicts before they lead to a shooting. Prior research has linked conflict mediation with program-related reductions in homicides, but the specific conflict mediation practices used by effective programs to prevent imminent gun violence have not been identified. We conducted case studies of CeaseFire programs in two inner cities using qualitative data from focus groups with 24 VIs and interviews with eight program managers. Study sites were purposively sampled to represent programs with more than 1 year of implementation and evidence of program effectiveness. Staff with more than 6 months of job experience were recruited for participation. Successful mediation efforts were built on trust and respect between VIs and the community, especially high-risk individuals. In conflict mediation, immediate priorities included separating the potential shooter from the intended victim and from peers who may encourage violence, followed by persuading the parties to resolve the conflict peacefully. Tactics for brokering peace included arranging the return of stolen property and emphasizing negative consequences of violence such as jail, death, or increased police attention. Utilizing these approaches, VIs are capable of preventing gun violence and interrupting cycles of retaliation.
    Journal of Urban Health 02/2013; 91(1). DOI:10.1007/s11524-013-9796-9 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives This study intended to explore clients’ experiences and provide a contextual basis for understanding their perceptions of the effectiveness of the Boston Medical Center (BMC) Violence Intervention Advocacy Program (VIAP).Methods This was an exploratory, qualitative study conducted in an urban, Level I trauma center from July 1, 2011 to February 24, 2012. Emergency department (ED) patients older than 18 years with penetrating trauma, and who were enrolled in the VIAP, were eligible. Two trained, qualitative interviewers who were not part of the VIAP obtained consent and conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, deidentified, coded, and analyzed. Thematic content analysis consistent with grounded theory was used to identify themes related to client experiences with VIAP, life circumstances, challenges to physical and emotional healing postinjury, services provided by VIAP, and perceptions of VIAP's effectiveness.ResultsTwenty subjects were interviewed. Most were male, African American, and younger than 30 years of age, reflecting the overall program's clientele. Most subjects perceived their advocates as caring adults in their lives and cited aspects of the peer support model that helped establish trusting relationships. Major challenges to healing were fear and safety, trust, isolation as a coping mechanism, bitterness, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Every subject noted important services provided by VIAP advocates. Most subjects explicitly stated that they had positive experiences with the VIAP and perceived advocates’ roles as a positive influence, providing client-centered advocacy, education, and support.Conclusions This study provides insight into the lives of 20 BMC VIAP clients and contextualizes their unique challenges. Participants described positive, life-changing behaviors on their journey to healing through connections to caring, supportive adults. Information gained from this study will help the VIAP to further support its clients. However, future research is needed to identify best practices for ED-based violence intervention programs and to measure community-wide efficacy in different settings.ResumenObjetivosEste estudio pretendió explorar las experiencias de los usuarios y proporcionar una base contextual para comprender sus percepciones de la eficacia del Violence Intervention Advocacy Program (VIAP) del Boston Medical Center (BMC).MétodosÉste fue un estudio cualitativo exploratorio realizado en un centro urbano de traumatología de nivel 1 del 1 de julio de 2011 al 24 de febrero de 2012. Se seleccionaron los pacientes del servicio de urgencias (SU) mayores de 18 años con traumatismo penetrante y reclutados en el VIAP. Dos entrevistadores formados, que no eran parte del VIAP, obtuvieron el consentimiento y llevaron a cabo las entrevistas semiestructuradas en profundidad. Las entrevistas se grabaron en audio, y fueron transcritas y analizadas, disociadas y codificadas. Se utilizó el análisis de contenido temático coherente con la teoría fundamentada para identificar los temas relacionados con las experiencias de los usuarios del VIAP, las circunstancias vitales, los retos para la curación física y emocional después de la lesión, los servicios prestados por el VIAP y la percepción de la eficacia del VIAP.ResultadosSe entrevistó a 20 sujetos. La mayoría fueron hombres, afroamericanos y menores de 30 años, lo que refleja los usuarios del programa. La mayoría de los sujetos percibieron a sus miembros como cuidadores adultos en sus vidas, y citaron aspectos del modelo de ayuda por iguales que ayudó a establecer relaciones de confianza. Los principales retos para la curación fueron la seguridad y el miedo, la confianza, el aislamiento como mecanismo de defensa, la amargura y los síntomas de trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT). Cada sujeto dio cuenta de los importantes servicios prestados por los miembros del VIAP. La mayoría de los sujetos indicaron expresamente que tuvieron experiencias positivas con el VIAP y percibieron los roles de sus miembros como una influencia positiva, que proporcionaron consejo centrado en el cliente, educación y ayuda.ConclusionesEste estudio proporciona la percepción de las vidas de 20 usuarios del VIAP del BMC y contextualiza sus retos únicos. Los participantes describieron los comportamientos positivos que cambiaron sus vidas en su viaje a la curación a través de sus conexiones para su atención, con los adultos de apoyo. La información obtenida de este estudio contribuirá con el VIAP en la ayuda a sus futuros usuarios. Sin embargo, se necesita investigación futura para identificar las mejores prácticas de los programas de intervención en violencia basados en un SU y medir su eficacia en el contexto comunitario en diferentes escenarios.
    Academic Emergency Medicine 07/2014; DOI:10.1111/acem.12409 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Mediation of potentially violent conflicts is a key component of CeaseFire, an effective gun violence-prevention programme. Objective To describe conflicts mediated by outreach workers (OW) in Baltimore's CeaseFire replication, examine neighbourhood variation, and measure associations between conflict risk factors and successful nonviolent resolution. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using records for 158 conflicts mediated between 2007 and 2009. Involvement of youth, gangs, retaliation, weapons and other risk factors were described. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for data-reduction purposes before the relationship between conflict risk components and mediation success was assessed with multivariate logistic regression. Results Most conflicts involved 2-3 individuals. Youth, persons with a history of violence, gang members and weapons were commonly present. OWs reported immediate, nonviolent resolution for 65% of mediated conflicts; an additional 23% were at least temporarily resolved without violence. PCA identified four dimensions of conflict risk: the risk-level of individuals involved; whether the incident was related to retaliation; the number of people involved; and shooting likelihood. However, these factors were not related to the OW's ability to resolve the conflict. Neighbourhoods with programme-associated reductions in homicides mediated more gang-related conflicts; neighbourhoods without programme-related homicide reductions encountered more retaliatory conflicts and more weapons.
    Injury Prevention 05/2012; 19(3):204-209. DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040429 · 1.94 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 26, 2014