Article

A note on modeling pedestrian-injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes with the mixed logit model

Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, National Infrastructure & GIS Research Division, 224 Simin-Ro, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 431-712, Republic of Korea.
Accident; analysis and prevention (Impact Factor: 1.65). 11/2010; 42(6):1751-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.016
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pedestrian-injury severity has been traditionally modeled with approaches that have assumed that the effect of each variable is fixed across injury observations. This assumption ignores possible unobserved heterogeneity which is likely to be particularly important in pedestrian injuries because unobserved physical health, strength, and behavior may significantly affect the pedestrians' ability to absorb collision forces. To address such unobserved heterogeneity, this research applies a mixed logit model to analyze pedestrian-injury severity in pedestrian-vehicle crashes. Using police-reported collision data from 1997 through 2000 from North Carolina, several factors were found to more than double the average probability of fatal injury for pedestrians in motor-vehicle crashes including: darkness without streetlights (400% increase in fatality probability), vehicle is a truck (370% increase), freeway (330% increase), speeding involved (360% increase), and collisions involving a motorist who had been drinking (250% increase). It was also found that the effect of pedestrian age was normally distributed across observations, and that as pedestrians became older the probability of fatal injury increased substantially. Heterogeneity in the mean of the random parameters for the freeway and pedestrian-solely-at-fault collision indicators was related to pedestrian gender, and heterogeneity in the mean of the random parameters for the traffic-sign and motorist-back-up indicators was related to pedestrian age.

0 Followers
 · 
136 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pedestrians are the most vulnerable road users. Some studies have verified that the visibility difference between pedestrians and drivers can lead to pedestrian-vehicle crashes at night when pedestrians cross the road. This paper considered the influences of the ratio of driver and pedestrian visibility, the vehicle original speed, the pavement friction coefficient and the vehicle mass on crashes when the pedestrians go through the road during night, and analysed the vehicle movement process and the collision speed and crash severity under different conditions. Besides, the special conditions considering driver characteristics, roadway features and vehicle features were analysed, respectively. From the results, it is observed that the collision speed and crash severity is higher when the ratio of driver and pedestrian visibility is smaller, the original speed is higher and pavement friction coefficient is higher. Moreover, from the results, the least distance between vehicles is also obtained. This study will make some contribution to the traffic safety improvement.
    Transportation Letters The International Journal of Transportation Research 10/2014; 6(4):165-172. DOI:10.1179/1942787514Y.0000000018 · 0.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current study contributes to the existing injury severity modeling literature by developing a multivariate probit model of injury severity and seat belt use decisions of both drivers involved in two-vehicle crashes. The modeling approach enables the joint modeling of the injury severity of multiple individuals involved in a crash, while also recognizing the endogeneity of seat belt use in predicting injury severity levels as well as accommodating unobserved heterogeneity in the effects of variables. The proposed model is applied to analyze the injury severity of drivers involved in two-vehicle road crashes in Denmark. The empirical analysis provides strong support for the notion that people offset the restraint benefits of seat belt use by driving more aggressively. Also, men and those individuals driving heavy vehicles have a lower injury risk than women and those driving lighter vehicles, respectively. At the same time, men and individuals driving heavy vehicles pose more of a danger to other drivers on the roadway when involved in a crash. Other important determinants of injury severity include speed limit on roadways where crash occurs, the presence (or absence) of center dividers (median barriers), and whether the crash involves a head-on collision. These and other results are discussed, along with implications for countermeasures to reduce injury severities in crashes. The analysis also underscores the importance of considering injury severity at a crash level, while accommodating seat belt endogeneity effects and unobserved heterogeneity effects.
    Transportation Research Part B Methodological 04/2013; 50. DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2013.01.007 · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Four-year accident data of Colorado Interstate highways is studied to investigate the injury severity of accidents occurring on mountainous highways (MT) and to compare the difference with non-mountainous highways (NM) by using mixed logit models. Injury severity from accidents occurring on MT and NM is modeled separately and their respective critical risk factors are evaluated including vehicle, roadway, environmental, driver and accident characteristics. Considerable differences are found existing between the impacts from a variety of variables on the injury severity in MT and NM accidents. Therefore more comprehensive observations can be made by conducting the injury severity study for MT and NM accidents separately. Estimation findings indicate that one indicator and two indicators will be better modeled as random parameters in MT and NM models respectively. As a result, the complex interactions of various variables and the nature of injury severity are able to be disclosed in a better way.
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 11/2013; 96. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.212