Article

A 'plane' explanation of anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanisms: a systematic review.

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center and Human Performance Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.
Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.32). 09/2010; 40(9):729-46. DOI: 10.2165/11534950-000000000-00000
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have been explored extensively, the factors surrounding the inciting event and the biomechanical mechanisms underlying ACL injury remain elusive. This systematic review summarizes all the relevant data and clarifies the strengths and weaknesses of the literature regarding ACL injury mechanisms. The hypothesis is that most ACL injuries do not occur via solely sagittal, frontal or transverse plane mechanisms. Electronic database literature searches of PubMed MEDLINE (1966-2008), CINAHL (1982-2008) and SportDiscus (1985-2008) were used for the systematic review to identify any studies in the literature that examined ACL injury mechanisms. Methodological approaches that describe and evaluate ACL injury mechanisms included athlete interviews, arthroscopic studies, clinical imaging and physical exam tests, video analysis, cadaveric studies, laboratory tests (motion analysis, electromyography) and mathematical modelling studies. One hundred and ninety-eight studies associated with ACL injury mechanisms were identified and provided evidence regarding plane of injury, with evidence supporting sagittal, frontal and/or transverse plane mechanisms of injury. Collectively, the studies indicate that it is highly probable that ACL injuries are more likely to occur during multi-planar rather than single-planar mechanisms of injury.

2 Followers
 · 
132 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Noncontact ACL injuries occur most commonly in pivoting sports and are much more frequent in females than in males. However, information on sex differences in proprioceptive acuity under weight-bearing and leg neuromuscular control in pivoting is scarce. The objective of this study was to investigate sex differences in pivoting neuromuscular control during strenuous stepping tasks and proprioceptive acuity under weight-bearing. 21 male and 22 female subjects were recruited to evaluate pivoting proprioceptive acuity under weight-bearing, and pivoting neuromuscular control (in terms of leg pivoting instability, stiffness, maximum internal and external pivoting angles, and entropy of time-to-peak EMG in lower limb muscles) during strenuous stepping tasks performed on a novel offaxis elliptical trainer. Compared to males, females had significantly lower proprioceptive acuity under weight-bearing in both internal and external pivoting directions, higher pivoting instability, larger maximum internal pivoting angle, lower leg pivoting stiffness, and higher entropy of time-to-peak EMG in the gastrocnemius muscles during strenuous stepping tasks with internal and external pivoting perturbations. Results of this study may help us better understand factors contributing to ACL injuries in females and males, develop training strategies to improve pivoting neuromuscular control and proprioceptive acuity, and potentially reduce ACL and lower-limb musculoskeletal injuries.
    Arbeitsphysiologie 11/2014; 115(4). DOI:10.1007/s00421-014-3062-z · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Alterations in sagittal plane landing biomechanics in the lower extremity have been observed within the chronic ankle instability (CAI) population. Interestingly, a potential link between the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ankle sprain history has been proposed. However, it is not known if the observed biomechanical changes associated with CAI could mimic factors related to the mechanism of ACL injury. We investigated the influence of CAI on anterior tibial shear force (ATSF), lower extremity sagittal plane kinematics, and posterior ground reaction force (GRF) in a jump landing task. Methods: Nineteen participants with CAI and 19 healthy control participants performed a vertical stop jump. Peak ATSF was calculated during the first landing of the stop jump, with sagittal-plane kinematics and posterior GRF measured at peak ATSF. Independent t-tests, multiple linear regression, and Pearson bivariate correlation were used for statistical analysis. Findings: Participants with CAI demonstrated less knee flexion at peak ATSF compared to the controls (P = .026). No group-differences were found for peak ATSF or the other biomechanical variables. Knee flexion was moderately correlated with peak ATSF (r = -0.544, P = .008); however, the contributing factor that most explained the variance in ATSF was posterior GRF (R2 = 0.449; P = .002) in the CAI group. Interpretation: Our findings indicate that the CAI group may be exhibiting altered knee function during functional movement. Screening knee movement patterns in individuals with CAI may help develop preventative measures for future joint injury throughout the kinetic chain.
    Clinical Biomechanics 10/2014; 29(10). DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.09.014 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Less optimal sagittal plane movement patterns are believed to increase knee injury risk in female athletes. To facilitate clinical screening with a user-friendly method, the purpose of the present study was to examine the temporal relationships between two-dimensional measured sagittal plane kinematics and three-dimensional joint moments during the double-leg drop vertical jump (DVJ) and single-leg DVJ (SLDVJ).
    The Knee 12/2014; 22(2). DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2014.12.006 · 1.70 Impact Factor