Article

Evaluation of the SCA instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with cancer care administered via paper or via the Internet

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Annals of Oncology (Impact Factor: 6.58). 03/2011; 22(3):723-9. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq417
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients' perspectives provide valuable information on quality of care. This study evaluates the feasibility and validity of Internet administration of Service Satisfaction Scale for Cancer Care (SCA) to assess patient satisfaction with outcome, practitioner manner/skill, information, and waiting/access.
Primary data collected from November 2007 to April 2008. Patients receiving cancer care within 1 year were recruited from oncology, surgery, and radiation clinics at a tertiary care hospital. An Internet-based version of the 16-item SCA was developed. Participants were randomised to Internet SCA followed by paper SCA 2 weeks later or vice versa. Seven-point Likert scale responses were converted to a 0-100 scale (minimum-maximum satisfaction). Response distribution, Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest correlations were calculated.
Among 122 consenting participants, 78 responded to initial SCA. Mean satisfaction scores for paper/Internet were 91/90 (outcome), 95/94 (practitioner manner/skill), 89/90 (information), and 86/86 (waiting/access). Response rate and item missingness were similar for Internet and paper. Except for practitioner manner/skill, test-retest correlations were robust r = 0.77 (outcome), 0.74 (information), and 0.75 (waiting/access) (all P < 0.001).
Internet SCA administration is a feasible and a valid measurement of cancer care satisfaction for a wide range of cancer diagnoses, treatment modalities, and clinic settings.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
49 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High levels of emotional distress in cancer patients often goes unnoticed in daily clinical routine, resulting in severe undertreatment of mental health problems in this patient group. Screening tools can be used to increase case identification, however, screening alone does not necessarily translate into better mental health for the patient. Doctors play a key role in providing basic emotional support and transferring the patients in need of such specific support to mental health professionals. This study investigates whether a stepped care model, combining screening, doctor consultation and professional psycho-oncological service in a structured way, improves the emotional wellbeing of cancer patients. This study is a cluster randomized trial with two parallel groups (intervention vs. care as usual), set in an academic hospital. Participants are cancer patients, a total of 1,000 at baseline. The intervention consists of stepped psychosocial care. Step one: screening for distress, step two: feedback of screening results to the doctor in charge of the patient and consultation with the patient, and step three: based on a shared patient-doctor decision, either transferal to the consultation liaison (CL) service or not. The outcome will be emotional well-being half a year after baseline, ascertained with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Randomization will be done by the cluster randomization of wards. Mental health problems not only cause emotional suffering but also direct and indirect costs. This calls for timely and adequate psychosocial support, especially as we know that such support is effective. However, not every cancer patient can and must be treated by a mental health professional. Allocating limited resources most sensibly and economically is of crucial importance for our healthcare system to ensure the best quality of care to as many patients as possible. It is the hope of the STEPPED CARE trial that this model is both effective and efficient, and that it can be implemented in other hospitals as well, if proven to be effective.Trial registration: Clinical Trials Register (Clinicaltrials.gov) identifier: NCT01859429 registration date 17 May 2013.
    Trials 12/2014; 15(1):482. DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-482 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has become increasingly common; however, there have been no nationwide, population-based, non–claims-based studies to evaluate differences in outcomes between RALP and open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Objective To determine surgical, oncologic, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes following RALP and RRP in a nationwide cohort. Design, setting, and participants We identified 903 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2000 and 2010 who underwent radical prostatectomy using RALP (n = 282) or RRP (n = 621) as primary treatment. Intervention Radical prostatectomy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We compared patients undergoing RALP or RRP across a range of perioperative, oncologic, and HRQOL outcomes. Results and limitations Use of RALP increased during the study period, constituting 85.2% of study subjects in 2009, up from 4.5% in 2003. Patients undergoing RALP compared to RRP were less likely to have a lymph node dissection (51.5% vs 85.4%; p < 0.0001), had less blood loss (207.4 ml vs 852.3 ml; p < 0.0001), were less likely to receive blood transfusions (4.3% vs 30.3%; p < 0.0001), and had shorter hospital stays (1.8 d vs 2.9 d; p < 0.0001). Surgical, oncologic, and HRQOL outcomes did not differ significantly among the groups. In multivariate logistic regression models, there were no significant differences in 3- or 5-yr recurrence-free survival comparing RALP versus RRP (hazard ratios: 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46–2.08] and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.18–3.11], respectively). Conclusions In a nationwide cohort of patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer, RALP was associated with shorter hospital stay, and lower blood loss and transfusion rates than RRP. Surgical oncologic and HRQOL outcomes were similar between groups. Patient summary We studied men throughout the United States with prostate cancer who underwent surgical removal of the prostate. We found that robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy resulted in shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and fewer blood transfusions than radical retropubic prostatectomy. There were no differences in cancer control or health-related quality of life.
    European Urology 02/2014; 67(3). DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039 · 10.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Collecting information on patients' experiences and opinions is prerequisite to improving the quality of services at a ward. The Ward Satisfaction Questionnaire (WSQ) was developed for this purpose. We investigated its psychometric characteristics and percentage of missing values. Methods: Over a period of 4 months, all patients at an interdisciplinary and an oncology ward were asked to complete the WSQ. Concordant validity was assessed using the Patient Involvement in Care Scales (PICS). Results: 68 of 99 administered questionnaires were completed (response rate 69 %). The median of missing values per item was 6 % (0 -28 %). Internal consistency of the WSQ scales ranged from 0.68 ("Accessibility of Doctors") to 0.94 ("Doctor Consultations"). Cronbach's Alpha of the total score was 0.94. Scaling errors were 0 % ("Ward Rounds", "Doctor Consulations", "Accessibility Nurses") to 17 % ("Accessibility Doctors"). Variances of WSQ scales were relatively low. Correlation patterns of WSQ and PICS support the validity of WSQ. Conclusions: The WSQ facilitates systematic feedback on inpatient services. Psychometric characteristics are good and validation in a larger patient sample is warranted.
    DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 05/2014; 139(27). DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1370104 · 0.55 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
10 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014