Expanding the Diagnostic Use of PCR in Leptospirosis: Improved Method for DNA Extraction from Blood Cultures

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 08/2010; 5(8):e12095. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012095
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Leptospirosis is a neglected zoonosis of ubiquitous distribution. Symptoms are often non-specific and may range from flu-like symptoms to multi-organ failure. Diagnosis can only be made by specific diagnostic tests like serology and PCR. In non-endemic countries, leptospirosis is often not suspected before antibiotic treatment has been initiated and consequently, relevant samples for diagnostic PCR are difficult to obtain. Blood cultures are obtained from most hospitalized patients before antibiotic therapy and incubated for at least five days, thus providing an important source of blood for PCR diagnosis. However, blood cultures contain inhibitors of PCR that are not readily removed by most DNA-extraction methods, primarily sodium polyanetholesulfonate (SPS).
In this study, two improved DNA extraction methods for use with blood cultures are presented and found to be superior in recovering DNA of Leptospira interrogans when compared with three previously described methods. The improved methods were easy and robust in use with all tested brands of blood culture media. Applied to 96 blood cultures obtained from 36 patients suspected of leptospirosis, all seven patients with positive convalescence serology were found positive by PCR if at least one anaerobic and one aerobic blood culture, sampled before antibiotic therapy were tested.
This study suggests that a specific and early diagnosis can be obtained in most cases of severe leptospirosis for up to five days after initiation of antimicrobial therapy, if PCR is applied to blood cultures already sampled as a routine procedure in most septic patients.


Available from: Karen Angeliki Krogfelt, Apr 26, 2015
  • Source
    Eurosurveillance: bulletin europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin 01/2015; 20(4). · 4.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Bacterial translocation (BT) may cause infections, in particular, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). In the absence of overt infection, BT may further stimulate the immune system and contribute to haemodynamic alterations and complications. Bacterial DNA (bDNA) is claimed to be a promising surrogate marker for BT, although its clinical relevance has been questioned. Materials and methods In 38 cirrhotic patients with and without SBP, bDNA in blood and ascites were assessed by 16S rDNA quantitative PCR. Levels of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in plasma and highly sensitive C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, soluble urokinase plasminogen activating receptor, interleukin-6, interleukin 8, interferon-gamma inducible protein-10 and vascular endothelial growth factor in plasma and ascites were measured by multiplex cytokine and ELISA assays. Results In patients without signs of SBP or positive cultures, we found a high frequency of bDNA but low concordance of bDNA between blood and ascites. Markers of inflammation were not significantly different between blood bDNA-positive (22%), ascites bDNA-positive (52%), and bDNA-negative patients. The 16S rDNA PCR failed to show bDNA in two out of six samples with SBP. Sequencing of positive samples did not determine the source of bDNA. Conclusion bDNA as assessed by this PCR method was largely unrelated to markers of inflammation and does not seem to be of clinical value in the diagnosis of SBP. According to our results, bDNA is not a reliable marker of BT. (C) 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 12/2014; 26(12):1360-6. DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000000217 · 2.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Leptospirosis is a serious zoonotic infection and the most prevalence disease in tropical and subtropical region such as north of Iran. Leptospires can gain entry into humans through different ways and it is associated with a very broad spectrum of clinical manifestations. Patients are asymptotic or present influenza-like illness symptoms in the first phase of infection; therefore early diagnosis is faced to quite difficulty. Generally, lack of early diagnosis lead to disease progression and make it difficult to treat. However, it is possible to reduce and/or prevent infection development and its treatment by timely and successful early diagnosis. Increasing our knowledge in the pathogenesis and diagnostic methods of leptospirosis is essential not only because of more complication and severe forms of the disease occur due to lack of timely diagnosis but also the awareness of the leptospirosis among general physicians and health works are not satisfied. The aim of this review is to improve knowledge about pathogenesis of leptospira and accurate and timely detection, these will affect in adaptation the best therapeutic strategies particularly in endemic region and among high risk peoples.