Article

Irreducible Pipkin II femoral head fractures: Is transgluteal approach the best strategy?

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Pointe-à-Pitre Teaching Hospital Center, Route de Chauvel, 97159 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research (Impact Factor: 1.17). 10/2010; 96(6):695-701. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.04.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Femoral head fracture-dislocations (FHFD) are rare, while irreducible cases are even less frequent. Truly irreducible fractures such as the two cases in this report must be differentiated from incomplete reduction due to incarcerated bone or soft tissue interposition. Opinions vary on the surgical approach to be used once the hip is reduced and the fragment of the femoral head yet remains to be stabilized. Reports in the literature do not usually take into account the specificity of irreducible lesions, which in our opinion should be treated by the transgluteal approach (TGA) while reducible forms can be treated by the Hueter approach. The transgluteal approach with the patient in the lateral decubitus position provides a direct anterior view of the antero-infero-medial fracture site as well as dorsal access via the injuries occasioned to dorsal soft tissues by the posterolateral dislocation. A lag screw can be used with this approach, which is the only way to stabilize the ligament teres femoris attachment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV retrospective historical study.

0 Followers
 · 
95 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Posterior fracture dislocation of the femoral head is a rare entity usually requiring open reduction and internal fixation. Results of different fixation methods have been reported including countersinking screws, headless screws and bioabsorbable implants. Osteochondral autologous transfer (mosaicplasty) is an established method of treatment of full thickness cartilage defects of the knee, ankle and elbow. At out institution posterior fracture-dislocations of the femoral head were treated with femoral head fragment fixation using osteochondral autografts via surgical hip dislocation. Osteochondral plugs were harvested from the non-weight-bearing area of the lateral femoral condyle of the knee and used for fixation of the reduced fragment. This article details the technique and its application.
    Journal of orthopaedic trauma 02/2014; DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000079 · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Femoral head fracture associated with hip dislocation is relatively rare but very severe injury. Due to its severity and the need of joint exposure for the reduction of femoral head fracture, the surgical treatment cannot but accompany many complications, including the osteonecrosis of the femoral head, heterotopic ossification, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. We report a case of less invasive percutaneous screw fixation for the femoral head fracture with excellent clinical result. Post operatively, the fracture was healed, and no acute complication was observed. At 4 years post operation, full Harris hip score was achieved, and there were no osteonecrosis of the femoral head, no heterotopic ossification, and no post-traumatic osteoarthritis. We suggest attempting less invasive percutaneous screw fixation for the femoral head fracture.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2013; 134(3). DOI:10.1007/s00402-013-1888-1 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hip dislocations are emergently reduced to decrease the chance of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. However, in some situations, the dislocation may be irreducible by a closed technique. Rarely, the fractured femoral head may become perched on an intact acetabulum, leading to an irreducible fracture-dislocation. This rare type of irreducible fracture-dislocation demonstrates unique physical and associated radiographic findings. These fractures are important to recognize early, as attempts at closed reduction can lead to femoral neck fractures.
    Clinical imaging 01/2012; 37(3):595-7. DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.06.009 · 0.60 Impact Factor