Article

Plasma Proteome Response to Severe Burn Injury Revealed by O-18-Labeled "Universal" Reference-Based Quantitative Proteomics

Biological Sciences Division and Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
Journal of Proteome Research (Impact Factor: 5). 09/2010; 9(9):4779-89. DOI: 10.1021/pr1005026
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A burn injury represents one of the most severe forms of human trauma and is responsible for significant mortality worldwide. Here, we present the first quantitative proteomics investigation of the blood plasma proteome response to severe burn injury by comparing the plasma protein concentrations of 10 healthy control subjects with those of 15 severe burn patients at two time-points following the injury. The overall analytical strategy for this work integrated immunoaffinity depletion of the 12 most abundant plasma proteins with cysteinyl-peptide enrichment-based fractionation prior to LC-MS analyses of individual patient samples. Incorporation of an 18O-labeled "universal" reference among the sample sets enabled precise relative quantification across samples. In total, 313 plasma proteins confidently identified with two or more unique peptides were quantified. Following statistical analysis, 110 proteins exhibited significant abundance changes in response to the burn injury. The observed changes in protein concentrations suggest significant inflammatory and hypermetabolic response to the injury, which is supported by the fact that many of the identified proteins are associated with acute phase response signaling, the complement system, and coagulation system pathways. The regulation of approximately 35 proteins observed in this study is in agreement with previous results reported for inflammatory or burn response, but approximately 50 potentially novel proteins previously not known to be associated with burn response or inflammation are also found. Elucidating proteins involved in the response to severe burn injury may reveal novel targets for therapeutic interventions as well as potential predictive biomarkers for patient outcomes such as multiple organ failure.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Celeste Finnerty, Jun 20, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
180 Views
 · 
37 Downloads
  • Source
    • "The growing number of these studies has resulted in a " data deluge [46]. " Researchers are being overwhelmed by data in large part because the methods of choice for analysis of these data are invariably based on statistical associations [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54]. Such analyses may suggest principal drivers of inflammation and MODS [54] [55] and may define the interconnected networks of mediators and signaling responses that underlie the pathobiology of acute critical illness [56] [57]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The complexity of the physiologic and inflammatory response in acute critical illness has stymied the accurate diagnosis and development of therapies. The Society for Complex Acute Illness was formed a decade ago with the goal of leveraging multiple complex systems approaches in order to address this unmet need. Two main paths of development have characterized the Society’s approach: i) data pattern analysis, either defining the diagnostic/prognostic utility of complexity metrics of physiological signals or multivariate analyses of molecular and genetic data, and ii) mechanistic mathematical and computational modeling, all being performed with an explicit translational goal. Here, we summarize the progress to date on each of these approaches, along with pitfalls inherent in the use of each approach alone. We suggest that the next decade holds the potential to merge these approaches, connecting patient diagnosis to treatment via mechanism-based dynamical system modeling and feedback control, and allowing extrapolation from physiologic signals to biomarkers to novel drug candidates. As a predicate example, we focus on the role of data-driven and mechanistic models in neuroscience, and the impact that merging these modeling approaches can have on general anesthesia.
    Journal of critical care 08/2014; 29(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.018 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Our interest was to find the proteins whose abundances were different between these two recovery groups. Samples were prepared using 18 O-labeled universal reference-based approach described in Qian et al. (2010) and analyzed by MS. Each experiment contained peptides from a pool sample and from an individual patient sample. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mass spectrometry-based high-throughput quantitative proteomics shows great potential in large-scale clinical biomarker studies, identifying and quantifying thousands of proteins in biological samples. However, there are unique challenges in analyzing the quantitative proteomics data. One issue is that the quantification of a given peptide is often missing in a subset of the experiments, especially for less abundant peptides. Another issue is that different mass spectrometry experiments of the same study have significantly varying numbers of peptides quantified, which can result in more missing peptide abundances in an experiment that has a smaller total number of quantified peptides. In order to detect as many biomarker proteins as possible, it is necessary to develop bioinformatics methods that appropriately handle these challenges.
    Bioinformatics 06/2014; 30(19). DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu341 · 4.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "There have been notable successes in this approach, which has led to the possibility of better defining the dynamic patient state. Various studies have shed mechanistic insights into the biology of trauma and sepsis based on DNA microarray (including the landmark first study from the Trauma and the Host Response to Injury " Glue " grant and studies in several countries identifying signature responses of sepsis, trauma, and burn patients) [6] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]; plasma proteomics in similar patients [22] [23]; and the use of signal processing techniques, multivariate dynamic clustering, and machine-learning algorithms based on physiologic measurements and inflammation biomarkers [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]. Furthermore, " omics " studies and data-driven computational analyses in animal models of trauma/hemorrhage, burns, and sepsis have both verified the importance of known biological pathways and suggested some novel ones [29] [30] [31]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Trauma, often accompanied by hemorrhage, is a leading cause of death worldwide, often leading to inflammation-related late complications that include sepsis and multiple organ failure. These secondary complications are a manifestation of the complexity of biological responses elicited by trauma/hemorrhage, responses that span most, if not all, cell types, tissues, and organ systems. This daunting complexity at the patient level is manifest by the near total dearth of available therapeutics, and we suggest that this dire condition is due in large part to the lack of a rational, systems-oriented framework for drug development, clinical trial design, in-hospital diagnostics, and post-hospital care. We have further suggested that mechanistic computational modeling can form the basis of such a rational framework, given the maturity of systems biology/computational biology. Herein, we briefly summarize the state of the art of these approaches, and highlight the biological insights and novel hypotheses derived from these approaches. We propose a rational framework for transitioning through the currently fragmented process from identification of biological networks that are potential therapeutic targets, through clinical trial design, to personalized diagnosis and care. Insights derived from systems and computational biology in trauma and sepsis include the centrality of Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern molecules as drivers of both beneficial and detrimental inflammation, along with a novel view of multiple organ dysfunction as a cascade of containment failures with distinct implications for therapy. Finally, we suggest how these insights might be best implemented to drive transformational change in the fields of trauma and sepsis.
    01/2012; 2(1):1-10.
Show more