A multicenter phase I trial of metronomic oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin in patients with NSCLC.

Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, PO Box 1352, 711 10 Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (Impact Factor: 2.8). 06/2011; 67(6):1239-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-010-1415-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of the present study was to determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) and the dose-limiting toxicities of a metronomic administration of oral vinorelbine and cisplatin in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Twenty-six patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were enrolled. Escalating doses of vinorelbine (40-70 mg p.o./trice per week) and cisplatin (70-85 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion) were administered on day 1 every 3 weeks. ΜΤDs were reached at 60 mg thrice/week p.o. for vinorelbine and 85 mg/m(2) for cisplatin. Grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and grade 4 diarrhea were the dose-limiting events during the first cycle of chemotherapy. The most common grade III-IV hematologic toxicity was neutropenia occurring in seven (27%) patients, while non-hematological toxicities were relatively infrequent and mostly of grade I or II. Objective responses were observed in 20.8% of patients with measurable disease. The regimen of metronomic administration and cisplatin is feasible and active in patients with NSCLC.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decade, metronomic chemotherapy has been increasingly considered as an attractive strategy for treating cancer in a variety of settings. Beside pharmaco-economic considerations making metronomics a unique opportunity in low- or middle-income countries, revisiting dosing schedules using continuous low doses of cytotoxics should theoretically permit to reduce the incidence of treatment-related toxicities, while offering unexpected novel mechanisms of actions such as antiangiogenic or immuno-stimulating properties. Consequently, a number of clinical trials sought to evaluate to what extent switching to metronomic schedules could actually impact indeed on the efficacy/toxicity balance of a variety of anticancer drugs in both adults and pediatric oncology. Vinorelbine is a vinca-alcaloïd that remains the backbone of several regimens to treat patients with metastatic breast cancer or non-small cell lung cancer. Additionally, vinorelbine is widely used to treat a variety of solid tumors in children such as rhabdomyosarcomas and acute leukemia. The recent approval of an oral formulation of vinorelbine has open the way to developing alternative metronomic schedules with this drug. Consequently, a number of clinical trials investigating on metronomic vinorelbine have been performed over the last few years, with seemingly inconsistent results to date. Of note, all the studies published thus far were based upon empirical determination of the metronomic schedule, both in terms of doses, drug-free intervals and repartition of the administrations throughout time. Because the very concept of «low, repeated doses with little or no drug-free interval» covers numerous possible combinations, determining the optimal protocol using traditional under-powered empirical design looks like an unreachable goal. In this context, mathematical modeling offers invaluable in silico tools to help determining the optimal metronomic schedule among a variety of possibilities. This review covers the latest clinical trials investigating on metronomic vinorelbine and proposes alternative strategies for developing computational decision support to make metronomics a scientific-grounded strategy, rather than an empirical practice at the bedside. In particular, mathematical simulations using an original pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics constraint models provide clues for exploring new paths in the way metronomic vinorelbine could be scheduled in patients with lung cancer.
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 08/2014; · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Over the past few years, more and more new selective molecules directed against specific cellular targets have become available for cancer therapy, leading to impressive improvements. In this evolving scenario, a new way of delivering older cytotoxic drugs has also been developing. Many studies demonstrated that several cytotoxic drugs have antiangiogenic properties if administered frequently and at lower doses compared with standard schedules containing maximal tolerated doses (MTD). Such a new strategy, named metronomic chemotherapy, focuses on a different target: the slowly proliferating tumour endothelial cells. About 10 years ago, metronomic chemotherapy was firstly enunciated and hereafter many clinical experiences were published related to almost any cancer disease. This review analyses available studies dealing with metronomic chemotherapy and its combination with several targeted agents in solid tumours. METHODS: A computerized literature search of MEDLINE was performed using the following search terms: metronomic OR "continuous low dose" AND chemotherapy AND cancer OR solid tumours. RESULTS: Satisfactory results have been achieved in diverse tumour types, such as breast and prostate cancer or paediatric sarcomas. Moreover, many studies have reported that metronomic chemotherapy determined minimal toxicity compared to MTD chemotherapy. Overall, published series on metronomic schedules are very heterogeneous often reporting on retrospective data, while only very few studies were randomized trials. These limitations still prevent to draw definitive conclusions in diverse tumour types. CONCLUSIONS: Large well-designed studies are eagerly awaited for confirming the promises of metronomic schedules and their combinations with targeted molecules.
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 03/2013; · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metronomic chemotherapy using cyclophosphamide (CPA) is widely associated with antiangiogenesis; however, recent studies implicate other immune-based mechanisms, including antitumor innate immunity, which can induce major tumor regression in implanted brain tumor models. This study demonstrates the critical importance of drug schedule: CPA induced a potent antitumor innate immune response and tumor regression when administered intermittently on a 6-day repeating metronomic schedule but not with the same total exposure to activated CPA administered on an every 3-day schedule or using a daily oral regimen that serves as the basis for many clinical trials of metronomic chemotherapy. Notably, the more frequent metronomic CPA schedules abrogated the antitumor innate immune and therapeutic responses. Further, the innate immune response and antitumor activity both displayed an unusually steep dose-response curve and were not accompanied by antiangiogenesis. The strong recruitment of innate immune cells by the 6-day repeating CPA schedule was not sustained, and tumor regression was abolished, by a moderate (25%) reduction in CPA dose. Moreover, an ∼20% increase in CPA dose eliminated the partial tumor regression and weak innate immune cell recruitment seen in a subset of the every 6-day treated tumors. Thus, metronomic drug treatment must be at a sufficiently high dose but also sufficiently well spaced in time to induce strong sustained antitumor immune cell recruitment. Many current clinical metronomic chemotherapeutic protocols employ oral daily low-dose schedules that do not meet these requirements, suggesting that they may benefit from optimization designed to maximize antitumor immune responses.
    Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) 01/2014; 16(1):84-96. · 5.48 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 5, 2014