Article

A Qualitative Analysis of the Decision-Making Process for Patients with Severe Lower Leg Trauma

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.33). 12/2010; 126(6):2019-29. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f4449e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Choosing the appropriate treatment for grade IIIB and IIIC open tibial fractures is a difficult decision for both the patient and the physician. Current research shows that the functional outcomes for reconstruction are similar to those for below-knee amputation, but little investigation of the qualitative outcomes of either treatment option has been performed from the patient perspective. This study was designed to perform a qualitative analysis of patient preferences for amputation or reconstruction.
Twenty patients with type IIIB or IIIC open tibial fractures participated in the study. These patients had undergone either amputation or reconstruction between 1997 and 2007. Semistructured interviews were conducted and qualitative outcomes were assessed.
Interviews highlighted several issues involved with medical decision-making. Participants described not having a role in deciding which medical treatment to choose. Family and spouses played a greater role, often because of patients being medicated when needing to make a treatment choice. Both amputation and reconstruction patients described being satisfied with the outcomes of their surgical treatments, but also expressed second thoughts about their treatment choices.
The findings of this study emphasize how difficult it is to assign preference to one medical treatment over another. The study reveals how the role of the patient is limited in making a decision about pursuing amputation or reconstruction. Instead, there is a continued need for physicians to discuss treatment options and risks with family members who act on the patient's behalf, and to incorporate the patient's preference in this complex decision.

1 Follower
 · 
114 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To explore the quality of life (QOL) and patient expectations among adolescents with neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) and their parents using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Methods A total of 18 adolescents (10–17 y) with residual NBPP impairment and their parents underwent separate 1-hour tape-recorded semistructured interviews. We also collected quantitative physical examination measures and patient-rated outcome scores, specifically the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument and the Child Health Questionnaire, to quantify the severity of each adolescent's functional deficit and increase our understanding of QOL and patient expectations. Results Through qualitative analysis, we identified several patient- and system-dependent factors contributing to QOL, such as social impact and peer acceptance, emotional adjustment, aesthetic concerns and body image, functional limitations, physical and occupational therapy, finances, pain, and family dynamics. Despite residual impairment, most adolescents and their parents reported a good overall QOL according to quantitative outcome measures. Our study results showed that functional and aesthetic factors were responsible for most observed differences in QOL among NBPP adolescents. We also found that the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument might be more sensitive than the Child Health Questionnaire in assessing patient expectations and QOL among this patient population. Conclusions Understanding patient expectations and QOL in NBPP adolescents is essential for medical decision making and advancing care. Physical examination measurements alone may not be sufficient for measuring outcome, and knowledge regarding environmental factors and family dynamics is important for clinicians to consider when counseling families of children with NBPP and improving overall outcome. Type of study/level of evidence Prognostic IV.
    The Journal of hand surgery 12/2013; 38(12):2387–2397.e2. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.09.006 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With regard to the improved surgical possibilities and the rising tendency of attempted limb salvage, the topic of secondary amputation becomes increasingly important. The aim of this study was to identify potential prognostic factors predicting secondary amputation in third-degree open lower limb fractures. All patients experienced third-degree open fractures of the lower limb without primary amputation (1994-2012). Prognostic factors were investigated to explain the final outcome of these patients (limb salvage vs. secondary amputation). From a total of 408 open diaphyseal tibia fractures, 93 consecutive fractures were identified (Gustilo-Anderson [G/A] type IIIA, n = 38; G/A type IIIB, n = 41; G/A type IIIC, n = 14) including seven patients with primary amputation. Definite limb salvage was achieved in 72 patients (88%), whereas in 10 patients (12%), secondary amputation was necessary. The median time to secondary amputation was 12 days (range, 2-1,573 days). The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 11 (range, 9-41), and the median Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was 4 (range, 2-9). The MESS was significantly higher in the amputation group compared with the limb salvage group (p = 0.0001). Furthermore, statistical testing revealed that the amount of complex fractures (p = 0.0132), the soft tissue damage (p = 0.0050), the vascular injury rate (p = 0.0110) and the fasciotomy rate (p = 0.0468) were significantly higher in the amputation group. In 60%, the limitations for limb salvage were infectious complications and/or, in 40%, was irreversible vessel occlusion after initial vessel reconstruction. The current study findings indicate that MESS is highly prognostic, but considering the significant advances in reconstructive techniques, decision making in patients with an MESS of 7 or greater should be reevaluated for the everyday clinical use. Prognostic study, level III. Therapeutic study, level IV.
    04/2014; 76(4):1076-81. DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000000154
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health services research (HSR) is broadly focused on characterizing and improving the access, quality, delivery, and cost of health care. HSR is a multidisciplinary field, engaging experts in clinical medicine and surgery, policy, economics, implementation science, statistics, psychology, and education to improve the care of patients across all specialties. This article summarizes the evolution and distinctive attributes of HSR and present several real-world applications.
    Hand Clinics 08/2014; 30(3):259–268. DOI:10.1016/j.hcl.2014.05.004 · 1.07 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
5 Downloads
Available from