Preventing potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized older patients with a computerized provider order entry warning system.

Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Palmer-Baker Span 2, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Archives of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 08/2010; 170(15):1331-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.244
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in hospitalized older patients is common. Our objective was to determine whether a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) drug warning system can decrease orders for PIMs in hospitalized older patients.
We used a prospective before-and-after design among patients 65 years or older admitted to a large, urban academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts, from June 1, 2004, through November 29, 2004 (for patients admitted before the warning system was added), and from March 17, 2005, through August 30, 2008 (patients admitted after the warning system was added). We instituted a medication-specific warning system within CPOE that alerted ordering providers at the point of care when ordering a PIM and that advised alternative medication or dose reduction. The main outcome measure was the rate of orders for PIMs before and after the warning system was deployed.
The mean (SE) rate of ordering medications that were not recommended dropped from 11.56 (0.36) to 9.94 (0.12) orders per day after the implementation of a CPOE warning system (difference, 1.62 [0.33]; P<.001), with no evidence that the effect waned over time. There were no appreciable changes in the rate of ordering medications for which only dose reduction was recommended or that were not targeted after CPOE implementation. These effects persisted in autoregressive models that accounted for secular trends and season (P<.001).
Specific alerts embedded into a CPOE system, used in patients 65 years or older, can decrease the number of orders of PIMs quickly and specifically.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Limited data suggest that potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) impact outcomes in critically ill elderly patients. No data are available on the association between PIM use as well as drug burden index (DBI), which is a measure of PIM use, and clinical outcomes in neurocritical care elderly patients. This study evaluates whether PIM use and a higher DBI are associated with poor clinical outcomes in neurocritical care elderly patients. PIMs were retrospectively identified in critically ill elderly patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) from March to July 2011. DBI was calculated based on PIM doses. Relationships with clinical outcomes were evaluated. PIMs were prescribed to a majority (81.3 %) of the 112 patients. Opioids were most commonly associated with a decrease in Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores (56 % of PIM doses). Time to recovery was significantly longer in patients with a higher PIM burden (≤2 PIMs: 8 h, >2 PIMs: 29 h; p = 0.02). There was a significantly longer NSICU and hospital length of stay (9 vs 2; 15 vs 5 days; p < 0.0001) as well as a lower Glasgow Coma Scale score upon discharge (14 vs 15, p = 0.02) in patients with a higher DBI after 72 h of hospitalization. There was no difference in mortality. PIM use and higher DBI scores were associated with poor clinical outcomes and longer lengths of stay. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of PIMs and DBI on mortality in neurocritical care elderly patients.
    Neurocritical Care 05/2014; 21(3). DOI:10.1007/s12028-014-9985-8 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems allow physicians to prescribe patient services electronically. In hospitals, CPOE essentially eliminates the need for handwritten paper orders and achieves cost savings through increased efficiency. The purpose of this research study was to examine the benefits of and barriers to CPOE adoption in hospitals to determine the effects on medical errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) and examine cost and savings associated with the implementation of this newly mandated technology. This study followed a methodology using the basic principles of a systematic review and referenced 50 sources. CPOE systems in hospitals were found to be capable of reducing medical errors and ADEs, especially when CPOE systems are bundled with clinical decision support systems designed to alert physicians and other healthcare providers of pending lab or medical errors. However, CPOE systems face major barriers associated with adoption in a hospital system, mainly high implementation costs and physicians' resistance to change.
    Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association 01/2014; 11:1b.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and objective: STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment) criteria aim at detecting potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people. The objective was to explore general practitioners' (GPs) perceptions regarding the use of the STOPP&START tool in their practice. Design: We conducted three focus groups which were conveniently sampled. Vignettes with clinical cases were provided for discussion as well as a full version of the STOPP&START tool. Knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of the tool and its implementation were discussed. Two researchers independently performed content analysis, classifying quotes and creating new categories for emerging themes. Results: Discussions highlighted incentives (e.g. systematic procedure for medication review) and barriers (e.g. time-consuming application) influencing the use of STOPP&START in primary care. Usefulness, comprehensiveness, and relevance of the tool were also questioned. Another important category emerging from the content analysis was the projected use of the tool. The GPs imagined key elements for the implementation in daily practice: computerized clinical decision support system, education, and multidisciplinary collaborations, especially at care transitions and in nursing homes. Conclusion: Despite variables views on the usefulness, comprehensiveness, and relevance of STOPP&START, GPs suggest the implementation of this tool in primary care within computerized clinical decision support systems, through education, and used as part of multidisciplinary collaborations.
    05/2014; 69(4):2295333714Y0000000036. DOI:10.1179/2295333714Y.0000000036


Available from