Article

The Three-His Triad in Dke1: Comparisons to the Classical Facial Triad

Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Biochemistry (Impact Factor: 3.01). 08/2010; 49(32):6945-52. DOI: 10.1021/bi100892w
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The oxygen activating mononuclear non-heme ferrous enzymes catalyze a diverse range of chemistry yet typically maintain a common structural motif: two histidines and a carboxylate coordinating the iron center in a facial triad. A new Fe(II) coordinating triad has been observed in two enzymes, diketone-cleaving dioxygenase, Dke1, and cysteine dioxygenase (CDO), and is composed of three histidine residues. The effect of this three-His motif in Dke1 on the geometric and electronic structure of the Fe(II) center is explored via a combination of absorption, CD, MCD, and VTVH MCD spectroscopies and DFT calculations. This geometric and electronic structure of the three-His triad is compared to that of the classical (2-His-1-carboxylate) facial triad in the alpha-ketoglutarate (alphaKG)-dependent dioxygenases clavaminate synthase 2 (CS2) and hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD). Comparison of the ligand fields at the Fe(II) shows little difference between the three-His and 2-His-1-carboxylate facial triad sites. Acetylacetone, the substrate for Dke1, will also bind to HPPD and is identified as a strong donor, similar to alphaKG. The major difference between the three-His and 2-His-1-carboxylate facial triad sites is in MLCT transitions observed for both types of triads and reflects their difference in charge. These studies provide insight into the effects of perturbation of the facial triad ligation of the non-heme ferrous enzymes on their geometric and electronic structure and their possible contributions to reactivity.

0 Followers
 · 
109 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The new iron(II)-thiolate complexes [((iPr)BIP)Fe(II)(SPh)(Cl)] (1) and [((iPr)BIP)Fe(II)(SPh)(OTf)] (2) [BIP = bis(imino)pyridine] were prepared as models for cysteine dioxygenase (CDO), which converts Cys to Cys-SO(2)H at a (His)(3)Fe(II) center. Reaction of 1 and 2 with O(2) leads to Fe-oxygenation and S-oxygenation, respectively. For 1 + O(2), the spectroscopic and reactivity data, including (18)O isotope studies, are consistent with an assignment of an iron(IV)-oxo complex, [((iPr)BIP)Fe(IV)(O)(Cl)](+) (3), as the product of oxygenation. In contrast, 2 + O(2) results in direct S-oxygenation to give a sulfonato product, PhSO(3)(-). The positioning of the thiolate ligand in 1 versus 2 appears to play a critical role in determining the outcome of O(2) activation. The thiolate ligands in 1 and 2 are essential for O(2) reactivity and exhibit an important influence over the Fe(III)/Fe(II) redox potential.
    Journal of the American Chemical Society 02/2011; 133(5):1274-7. DOI:10.1021/ja109923a · 11.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The O(2) activating mononuclear nonheme iron enzymes generally have a common facial triad (two histidine and one carboxylate (Asp or Glu) residue) ligating Fe(II) at the active site. Exceptions to this motif have recently been identified in nonheme enzymes, including a 3His triad in the diketone cleaving dioxygenase Dke1. This enzyme is used to explore the role of the facial triad in directing reactivity. A combination of spectroscopic studies (UV-vis absorption, MCD, and resonance Raman) and DFT calculations is used to define the nature of the binding of the α-keto acid, 4-hydroxyphenlpyruvate (HPP), to the active site in Dke1 and the origin of the atypical cleavage (C2-C3 instead of C1-C2) pattern exhibited by this enzyme in the reaction of α-keto acids with dioxygen. The reduced charge of the 3His triad induces α-keto acid binding as the enolate dianion, rather than the keto monoanion, found for α-keto acid binding to the 2His/1 carboxylate facial triad enzymes. The mechanistic insight from the reactivity of Dke1 with the α-keto acid substrate is then extended to understand the reaction mechanism of this enzyme with its native substrate, acac. This study defines a key role for the 2His/1 carboxylate facial triad in α-keto acid-dependent mononuclear nonheme iron enzymes in stabilizing the bound α-keto acid as a monoanion for its decarboxylation to provide the two additional electrons required for O(2) activation.
    Journal of the American Chemical Society 08/2011; 133(40):15979-91. DOI:10.1021/ja203005j · 11.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this work, we present the first computational study on a biomimetic cysteine dioxygenase model complex, [Fe(II)(LN(3)S)](+), in which LN(3)S is a tetradentate ligand with a bis(imino)pyridyl scaffold and a pendant arylthiolate group. The reaction mechanism of sulfur dioxygenation with O(2) was examined by density functional theory (DFT) methods and compared with results obtained for cysteine dioxygenase. The reaction proceeds via multistate reactivity patterns on competing singlet, triplet, and quintet spin state surfaces. The reaction mechanism is analogous to that found for cysteine dioxygenase enzymes (Kumar, D.; Thiel, W.; de Visser, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3869-3882); hence, the computations indicate that this complex can closely mimic the enzymatic process. The catalytic mechanism starts from an iron(III)-superoxo complex and the attack of the terminal oxygen atom of the superoxo group on the sulfur atom of the ligand. Subsequently, the dioxygen bond breaks to form an iron(IV)-oxo complex with a bound sulfenato group. After reorganization, the second oxygen atom is transferred to the substrate to give a sulfinic acid product. An alternative mechanism involving the direct attack of dioxygen on the sulfur, without involving any iron-oxygen intermediates, was also examined. Importantly, a significant energetic preference for dioxygen coordinating to the iron center prior to attack at sulfur was discovered and serves to elucidate the function of the metal ion in the reaction process. The computational results are in good agreement with experimental observations, and the differences and similarities of the biomimetic complex and the enzymatic cysteine dioxygenase center are highlighted.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 11/2011; 116(1):582-91. DOI:10.1021/jp208230g · 2.78 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from