Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength: A new thrombelastographic indicator of long-term poststenting ischemic events

Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
American heart journal (Impact Factor: 4.46). 08/2010; 160(2):346-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.05.034
Source: PubMed


Poststenting ischemic events occur despite dual-antiplatelet therapy, suggesting that a "one size fits all" antithrombotic strategy has significant limitations. Ex vivo platelet function measurements may facilitate risk stratification and personalized antiplatelet therapy.
We investigated the prognostic utility of the strength of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced (MA(ADP)) and thrombin-induced (MA(THROMBIN)) platelet-fibrin clots measured by thrombelastography and ADP-induced light transmittance aggregation (LTA(ADP)) in 225 serial patients after elective stenting treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Ischemic and bleeding events were assessed over 3 years.
Overall, 59 (26%) first ischemic events occurred. Patients with ischemic events had higher MA(ADP), MA(THROMBIN), and LTA(ADP) (P < .0001 for all comparisons). By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, MA(ADP) >47 mm had the best predictive value of long-term ischemic events compared with other measurements (P < .0001), with an area under the curve = 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.89, P < .0001). The univariate Cox proportional hazards model identified MA(ADP) >47 mm, MA(THROMBIN) >69 mm, and LTA(ADP) >34% as significant independent predictors of first ischemic events at the 3-year time point, with hazard ratios of 10.3 (P < .0001), 3.8 (P < .0001), and 4.8 (P < .0001), respectively. Fifteen bleeding events occurred. Receiver operating characteristic curve and quartile analysis suggests MA(ADP) <or=31 as a predictive value for bleeding.
This study is the first demonstration of the prognostic utility of MA(ADP) in predicting long-term event occurrence after stenting. The quantitative assessment of ADP-stimulated platelet-fibrin clot strength measured by thrombelastography can serve as a future tool in investigations of personalized antiplatelet treatment designed to reduce ischemic events and bleeding.

Download full-text


Available from: Udaya S Tantry, Oct 09, 2015
19 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous clinical studies have shown heterogeneity in individual patient responses to antiplatelet therapy and high residual platelet reactivity is associated with increased risk of adverse clinical events. Monitoring response to antiplatelet therapy and tailoring treatment accordingly is currently not recommended in routine clinical practice largely due to the lack of a standardized definition of antiplatelet therapy hyporesponse and the need for a widely accepted point-of-care platelet function test that can be reliably utilized in frontline clinical practice. Recent data have shown that titrating the dose of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and large-scale clinical trials are currently underway to investigate whether individually tailored treatment based on results of platelet function testing leads to improved clinical outcome. Furthermore, genetic testing has demonstrated a link between CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms, altered clopidogrel metabolite concentrations and adverse clinical events. Clinical studies are currently underway to investigate the potential clinical benefit associated with genotype-guided tailoring of antiplatelet therapy. With the advent of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents and their associated increased bleeding risks, it will become imperative in the future to select the most appropriate, safe and effective drug.
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 03/2011; 72(4):683-96. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03955.x · 3.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The pivotal role of platelet activation and reactivity during atherothrombotic event occurrence associated with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is well established. Numerous translational research studies have established a threshold level of platelet reactivity during dual antiplatelet therapy above which a higher risk for ischaemic event occurrence has been observed. The clinical validity of these threshold values in reducing ischemic event occurrence with modified P2Y12 receptor therapy is currently under investigation in large-scale clinical trials. The association between on-treatment platelet reactivity measured by an ex vivo assay and the occurrence of bleeding events is less established. Currently, there is limited evidence of an association between platelet inhibition and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)- related bleeding in patients on clopidogrel therapy indicating that preoperative platelet function monitoring may guide both the timing of elective CABG and the administration of blood products in patients needing surgery. However, in the absence of a large-scale prospective clinical trial, routine platelet function monitoring and modification of timing of surgery based on platelet function monitoring are currently not recommended.
    Thrombosis and Haemostasis 04/2011; 106(2):248-52. DOI:10.1160/TH11-02-0063 · 4.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is recommended for the prevention of ischemic events in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. In patients with atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin is the 'gold standard' for the prevention of thromboembolism. Nearly 20% of patients with atrial fibrillation also have coronary artery disease and receive combination therapy consisting of dual antiplatelet therapy plus warfarin, also known as triple antithrombotic therapy. Unfortunately, though, increased bleeding risk is a major concern during triple therapy. Whether platelet function testing can guide personalized antiplatelet therapy and reduce ischemic risk is under investigation in large trials of patients treated with coronary artery stents. However, limited data are available to establish the relationship between platelet function testing and bleeding in patients treated with dual or triple therapy. Personalized treatment strategies could help to achieve maximum clinical benefit while avoiding excessive bleeding complications. In this article, we review available data on the utility of platelet function testing in assessing bleeding risk and its potential role in personalizing combination antithrombotic therapies with the aim of reducing ischemic events and the frequency of bleeding.
    Nature Reviews Cardiology 07/2011; 8(10):572-9. DOI:10.1038/nrcardio.2011.107 · 9.18 Impact Factor
Show more