Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta-analysis.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48104, USA.
Personality and Social Psychology Review (Impact Factor: 7.55). 05/2011; 15(2):180-98. DOI: 10.1177/1088868310377395
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The current study examines changes over time in a commonly used measure of dispositional empathy. A cross-temporal meta-analysis was conducted on 72 samples of American college students who completed at least one of the four subscales (Empathic Concern, Perspective Taking, Fantasy, and Personal Distress) of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) between 1979 and 2009 (total N = 13,737). Overall, the authors found changes in the most prototypically empathic subscales of the IRI: Empathic Concern was most sharply dropping, followed by Perspective Taking. The IRI Fantasy and Personal Distress subscales exhibited no changes over time. Additional analyses found that the declines in Perspective Taking and Empathic Concern are relatively recent phenomena and are most pronounced in samples from after 2000.

  • Psychodynamic Practice 06/2014; 20(3):228-249. DOI:10.1080/14753634.2014.916840
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A few months ago one of us (WKC) saw two concerts. The first was dubbed the Americanarama Festival and featured Bob Dylan, Bob Weir, Wilco, and My Morning Jacket; the second headlined Keith Urban with My Little Big Town. Both concerts featured country music, acoustic guitars, and traditional themes, but they differed dramatically in their relationship with emerging media. At the Americanarama Festival, the crowd was told repeatedly that anyone seen taking videos with a cell phone would be removed from the concert. Before Bob Dylan came onto the stage, the audience was told again that they should watch the show in real life and not through a tiny screen. After the show, however, people still posted clips online – all the security and warnings did not stop the use of media. The approach taken at the Keith Urban show was 180 degrees from this. Fans were encouraged to film and photograph the concert with their phones. At one point, a band member actually picked up a fan's phone and filmed the band from the stage. At another point, a fan was brought up and had her picture taken with Keith Urban in front of the audience. Finally, the audience was asked to turn on the lights on their phones during a particular song (as we used to do with lighters in the 1970s and 1980s and even into the 1990s). During the entire show fans were capturing images and presumably sending them to friends or uploading them online to sites such as Facebook or Twitter. This tiny cultural snippet conveys some of the key issues around narcissism, emerging media, and culture. First, there is a huge pull to capture and broadcast experiences rather than directly experiencing them. The broadcasting gives people an opportunity for self‐enhancement, potentially a narcissistic pursuit. Second, despite Bob Dylan's best efforts, emerging media are apparently going to win. When a security team cannot stop a behavior, you have lost. And, third, cultural pressures and emerging media each cause the other. In the present chapter, we focus on the role of narcissism in emerging media use and culture. We begin by providing a description of narcissism as an individual trait and as a socio‐cultural process. We then discuss the research findings on
    The Wiley Handbook of Psychology Technology, and Society, First edited by Larry D. Rosen, Nancy A. Cheever, L. Mark Carrier, 05/2015: chapter Narcissism, Emerging Media, and Society; Wiley., ISBN: 978-1118772027
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A mericans have become increasingly tolerant of controversial outgroups in results from the nationally representative General Social Survey (1972–2012, N = 35,048). Specifically, adults in the 2010s (versus the 1970s and 1980s) were more likely to agree that Communists, homosexuals, the anti-religious, militarists, and those believing Blacks are genetically inferior should be allowed to give a public speech, teach at a college, or have a book in a local library. Cross-classification hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses separating the effects of time period, cohort/generation, and age show that these trends were driven by both a linear time period effect and a curvilinear cohort effect, with those born in the late 1940s (Boomers) the most tolerant when age and time period were controlled. Tolerance of homosexuals increased the most, and tolerance of racists the least. The increase in tolerance is positively correlated with higher levels of education and individual-istic attitudes, including rejecting traditional social rules, but is negatively correlated with changes in empathy. Suppose someone with controversial views came to your community. Would you favor allowing them to give a speech? Would you want them to teach at a local college or university? Should a book expressing their views be banned from your local library? The General Social Survey (GSS), a nationally representative sample of adult Americans collected since 1972, asked these questions about five different controversial views or lifestyles: homosexuals, Communists, anti-religious atheists, militarists, and racists. These questions get to the heart of recent debates around tolerance, acceptance, individual rights, and freedom within liberal democracies. In this paper, we examine whether tolerance for controversial views and lifestyles has changed over time. That is, are people today more tolerant than they were in the 1970s, and of which groups? For the purposes of this paper, we define tolerance as agreeing that controversial outgroups should be allowed public expression. Tolerance is an important indicator of how societies treat people with views and lifestyles divergent from their average members.
    Social Forces 01/2015; DOI:10.1093/sf/sov050 · 1.29 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014