Article

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Omalizumab vs Placebo as Add-on Therapy to Corticosteroids for Children and Adults With Asthma A Systematic Review

Departamento de Emergencia, Hospital Central de las Fuerzas Armadas, Av. 8 de Octubre 3020, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay.
Chest (Impact Factor: 7.13). 01/2011; 139(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-1194
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE for the treatment of severe allergic asthma. Because omalizumab targets an immune system molecule, there has been particular interest in the drug's safety.
To establish the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous omalizumab as add-on therapy to corticosteroids, a systematic review of placebo-controlled studies was performed. Primary outcomes were reduction of steroid use and asthma exacerbations. Secondary outcome measures included lung function, rescue medication use, asthma symptoms, health-related quality of life, and adverse effects.
Eight trials (3,429 participants) fulfilled the selection criteria. At the end of the steroid-reduction phase, patients taking omalizumab were more likely to be able to withdraw from corticosteroids completely compared with those taking placebo (relative risk [RR] = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.42-2.28; P = .00001). Omalizumab patients showed a decreased risk of asthma exacerbations at the end of the stable (RR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.66; P = .0001) and adjustable-steroid phases (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47-0.64; P = .0001); post-hoc analysis suggests this effect was independent of duration of treatment, age, severity of asthma, and risk of bias. The frequency of serious adverse effects was similar in the omalizumab (3.8%) and placebo (5.3%) groups. However, injection site reactions were more frequent in the omalizumab patients (19.9% vs 13.2%). There were no indications of increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions, cardiovascular effects, or malignant neoplasms.
Data indicate that the efficacy of add-on omalizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma is accompanied by an acceptable safety profile.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jose A Castro-Rodriguez, Aug 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
214 Views
  • Source
    • "Likewise, the mean increase from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was similar between the MEDI-528 and placebo groups, which is consistent with the earlier study where FEV1 was essentially unchanged and short-acting beta agonist use was comparable among groups [11]. Studies with other monoclonal antibodies, including omalizumab [19] and mepolizumab [20], also reported modest, if any, improvements in FEV1. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Preclinical studies suggest that interleukin-9 may be a central mediator in the development and maintenance of airway inflammation in asthma. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effects of MEDI-528, an anti-interleukin-9 monoclonal antibody, in adults with confirmed uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma. In this prospective double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study, 329 subjects were randomized (1:1:1:1) to subcutaneous placebo or MEDI-528 (30, 100, 300 mg) every 2 weeks for 24 weeks, in addition to their usual asthma medications. The primary endpoint was change in mean Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) score at week 13. Secondary endpoints included weighted asthma exacerbation rates and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at weeks 13 and 25, as well as Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores at weeks 12 and 25 and the safety of MEDI-528 throughout the study period. The primary endpoint was analyzed using analysis of covariance. The study population (n = 327) was predominantly female (69%) with a mean age of 43 years (range 18--65). The mean (SD) baseline ACQ-6 score for placebo (n = 82) and combined M EDI-528 (n = 245) was 2.8 (0.7) and 2.8 (0.8); FEV1 % predicted was 70.7% (15.9) and 71.5% (16.7). Mean (SD) change from baseline to week 13 in ACQ-6 scores for placebo vs combined MEDI-528 groups was -1.2 (1.0) vs -1.2 (1.1) (p = 0.86). Asthma exacerbation rates (95% CI) at week 25 for placebo vs MEDI-528 were 0.58 (0.36--0.88) vs 0.49 (0.37--0.64) exacerbations/subject/year (p = 0.52). No significant improvements in FEV1 % predicted were observed between the placebo and MEDI-528 groups. Adverse events were comparable for placebo (82.9%) and MEDI-528 groups (30 mg, 76.5%; 100 mg, 81.9%; 300 mg, 85.2%). The most frequent were asthma (placebo vs MEDI-528, 30.5% vs 33.5%), upper respiratory tract infection (14.6% vs 17.1%), and headache (9.8% vs 9.8%). The addition of MEDI-528 to existing asthma controller medications was not associated with any improvement in ACQ-6 scores, asthma exacerbation rates, or FEV1 values, nor was it associated with any major safety concerns.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00968669.
    Respiratory research 09/2013; 14(1):93. DOI:10.1186/1465-9921-14-93 · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Omalizumab is an anti-IgE antibody that is administered by regular (ie, fortnightly) subcutaneous injections. Omalizumab reduces symptoms and exacerbations and improves lung function as well as quality of life in children with atopic asthma.33–35 The use of omalizumab should be reserved for children where asthma control cannot be maintained by other medications.17 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The principal aims of asthma management in childhood are to obtain symptom control that allows individuals to engage in unrestricted physical activities and to normalize lung function. These aims should be achieved using the fewest possible medications. Ensuring a correct diagnosis is the first priority. The mainstay of asthma management remains pharmacotherapy. Various treatment options are discussed. Asthma monitoring includes the regular assessment of asthma severity and asthma control, which then informs decisions regarding the stepping up or stepping down of therapy. Delivery systems and devices for inhaled therapy are discussed, as are the factors influencing adherence to prescribed treatment. The role of the pediatric health care provider is to establish a functional partnership with the child and their family in order to minimize the impact of asthma symptoms and exacerbations during childhood.
    04/2013; 7:13-24. DOI:10.4137/CMPed.S7867
  • Source
    • "For example, asthma is often characterized by increased levels of allergen-mediated immunoglobulin E (IgE) production, which leads to mast cell release of bronchoconstrictive and pro-inflammatory mediators. For a subset of difficult-to-control asthmatics, treatment with an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, omalizumab, may improve symptoms and reduce asthma flares over time (Rodrigo et al 2011). In contrast, COPD is characterized by progressive breathlessness with exertion often due to dynamic hyperinflation and fixed airflow obstruction. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are distinct but clinically overlapping airway disorders which often create diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. Current strategies to discriminate these diseases are limited by insensitivity and poor performance due to biologic variability. We tested the hypothesis that a gas chromatograph/differential mobility spectrometer (GC/DMS) sensor could distinguish between clinically well-defined groups with airway disorders based on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) obtained from exhaled breath. After comparing VOC profiles obtained from 13 asthma, 5 COPD and 13 healthy control subjects, we found that VOC profiles distinguished asthma from healthy controls and also a subgroup of asthmatics taking the drug omalizumab from healthy controls. The VOC profiles could not distinguish between COPD and any of the other groups. Our results show a potential application of the GC/DMS for non-invasive and bedside diagnostics of asthma and asthma therapy monitoring. Future studies will focus on larger sample sizes and patient cohorts.
    Journal of Breath Research 03/2013; 7(1):017113. DOI:10.1088/1752-7155/7/1/017113 · 3.59 Impact Factor
Show more