Basic operations in working memory: contributions from functional imaging studies.

Institute of Medical Psychology, Goethe University, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Strasse 10, D-60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Behavioural brain research (Impact Factor: 3.39). 12/2010; 214(2):172-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Working memory (WM) constitutes a fundamental aspect of human cognition. It refers to the ability to keep information active for further use, while allowing it to be prioritized, modified and protected from interference. Much research has addressed the storage function of WM, however, its 'working' aspect still remains underspecified. Many operations that work on the contents of WM do not appear specific to WM. The present review focuses on those operations that we consider "basic" because they operate in the service of memory itself, by providing its basic functionality of retaining information active, in a stable yet flexible way. Based on current process models of WM we review five strands of research: (1) mnemonic selection of one item amongst others, (2) updating the focus of attention with the selected item, (3) updating the content of visual WM with new item(s), (4) rehearsal of visuospatial information and (5) coping with interference. We discuss the neuronal substrates underlying those operations obtained with functional magnetic resonance imaging and relate them to findings on "executive functions". The presented data support the view that WM emerges from interactions between higher sensory, attentional and mnemonic functions, with separable neural bases. However, interference processing and the representation of rule switching in WM may demand an extension of the current WM models by executive control functions.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This ERP study used electrophysiological technique to examine how individual differences in the speed of working memory updating influence the use of syntactic and semantic information during on-line sentence argument interpretation, and the time course of that working memory updating effect. The basic structure of the experimental sentences was "Noun + Verb + adverb + 'le' + a two-character word", with the Noun being the sentence initial argument. This initial argument is animate or inanimate and the following verb disambiguates it as an agent or patient. The results at the initial argument revealed that, the quick-updating group elicited a larger positivity over the frontal cortex (within 500-800 ms post-noun onset) as compared with the slow-updating group. At the following disambiguating verb, the slow-updating group only showed a word order effect, indicating that the patient-first condition elicited a larger P600 (within 500-1,000 ms post-verb onset) than the agent-first one; for the quick-updating group, at the early stage of processing, the patient-first sentences elicited a larger N400 (within 300-500 ms post-verb onset) than the agent-first ones only when the initial argument was inanimate; however, at the late stage, the patient-first sentences elicited an enhanced P600 (within 800-1,000 ms post-verb onset) only when the initial argument was animate. These results suggested that the speed of working memory updating not only influences the maintenance of sentence argument when the contents of working memory change but also influences the efficiency of integrating that argument with the verb at a late time point. When integrating the argument with the disambiguating verb, individuals with quick-updating ability can combine multiple sources of information (both noun animacy and word order), and conduct rapid and fine-grained two-stage processing; individuals with slow-updating ability, however, only rely on one dominant source of information types (word order), and conducted slow and course-grained processing.
    Cognitive Neurodynamics 12/2014; 8(6):447-464. DOI:10.1007/s11571-014-9292-2
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Visual attention enables observers to select behaviorally relevant information based on spatial locations, features, or objects. Attentional selection is not limited to physically present visual information, but can also operate on internal representations maintained in working memory (WM) in service of higher-order cognition. However, only little is known about whether attention to WM contents follows the same principles as attention to sensory stimuli. To address this question, we investigated in humans whether the typically observed effects of object-based attention in perception are also evident for object-based attentional selection of internal object representations in WM. In full accordance with effects in visual perception, the key behavioral and neuronal characteristics of object-based attention were observed in WM. Specifically, we found that reaction times were shorter when shifting attention to memory positions located on the currently attended object compared with equidistant positions on a different object. Furthermore, functional magnetic resonance imaging and multivariate pattern analysis of visuotopic activity in visual (areas V1-V4) and parietal cortex revealed that directing attention to one position of an object held in WM also enhanced brain activation for other positions on the same object, suggesting that attentional selection in WM activates the entire object. This study demonstrated that all characteristic features of object-based attention are present in WM and thus follows the same principles as in perception. Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/353360-10$15.00/0.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Significant research effort has already been invested in the field of robot-assisted therapy for children with developmental disorders, and the researchers generally agree that therapists should be involved in the development of assistive robotic tools. However, relatively little attention has been devoted to robots' capacity to autonomously engage in a natural language dialogue in the context of robot-assisted therapy. This paper focuses on this desideratum. It introduces a programming platform that enables the therapist to design a robot's dialogue behavior. To the extent that the platform is domain-independent, it enables the therapist to flexibly model (1) the interaction domain and the lexicon, (2) the interaction context, and (3) the robot's dialogue strategy. To the extent that the platform is therapist-centered, it is motivated by real-life difficulties that therapists encounter while trying to specify a robot's dialogue behavior and can be used by nontechnical therapists in a user-friendly and intuitive manner. In addition, the platform (4) enables the therapist to test dialogue strategies independently of therapeutic settings, and (5) provides estimated cognitive load placed on the child while trying to process the therapist's dialogue acts.
    Cognitive Computation 12/2014; 6(4):775-788. DOI:10.1007/s12559-014-9272-1

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 23, 2014