An anterior chamber toxicity study evaluating Besivance, AzaSite, and Ciprofloxacin.

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
American Journal of Ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 4.02). 10/2010; 150(4):498-504.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.05.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We determined whether Besivance (Bausch & Lomb), AzaSite (Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc; both with DuraSite bioadhesive [InSite Vision, Inc]) and ciprofloxacin are toxic inside the anterior chamber.
Randomized, masked, placebo-controlled animal study.
Twenty New Zealand white rabbits (40 eyes) were randomized to 1 of 4 study groups: Besivance, AzaSite, ciprofloxacin, and balanced salt solution. Each eye was injected with 0.1 mL of the study medication. Clinical slit-lamp examinations were conducted at 24 and 48 hours after injection. All rabbits then were killed and all eyes were enucleated. We randomized eyes to either corneal vital staining or histopathologic examination. The main outcome measures were clinical and pathologic signs of toxicity.
The 2 DuraSite-based study groups (Besivance and AzaSite) showed clinically and pathologically significant differences when compared with the ciprofloxacin and balanced salt solution groups. Besivance and AzaSite eyes exhibited significantly similar and severe clinical damage, including severe corneal edema. Ciprofloxacin and balanced salt solution eyes appeared very similar and had only mild conjunctival injection and limbal vascularity. Vital staining and histopathologic evaluation revealed glaucomatous and toxic damage in eyes given DuraSite-based medications, whereas non-DuraSite groups showed minimal changes.
DuraSite blocks the trabecular meshwork and may be additionally toxic when introduced as a large bolus. Until the safety of these medications is established with further studies using smaller injected volumes, we recommend placement of a suture over a clear corneal wound if DuraSite-based medications are used.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The graph theory/network flow approach to the emergency-service restoration problem is discussed. The mixer integer programming formulation looks rigorous and concise. However, its usefulness appears to be very limited due to computational difficulties. By introducing artificial branches and a source and sink, the problem may be formulated as a maximal-flow problem in a restricted sense. In this case, zero-one decision variables representing switch status should be handled separately after the solution to the completely connected network is obtained. It is shown that the straight-forward application of the graph theory/network flow approach is not suitable for the problem. This simply points out difficulties associated with the problem and also suggests that heuristic algorithms need to be used to handle problems of this nature
    Circuits and Systems, 1988., IEEE International Symposium on; 07/1988
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Azithromycin is an azalide that acts by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit of susceptible microorganisms and interfering with microbial protein synthesis. Azithromycin is also noted by anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activity. AzaSite(®) (Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Durham, NC) is azithromycin ophthalmic solution, 1% formulated in polycarbophil (the aqueous mucoadhesive polymer contained in DuraSite(®)) that delivers high and prolonged azithromycin concentrations in a variety of ocular tissues, including the conjunctiva, cornea and particularly the eyelid. AzaSite was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US in 2007, for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis caused by susceptible isolates. This article aims to evaluate the peer-reviewed published scientific literature and to define well-established uses of AzaSite eye drops in the field of ocular infections.
    Clinical Ophthalmology 06/2011; 5:801-9. DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S13785 · 0.76 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether the addition of a bioadhesive drug-delivery system to topical azithromycin induces intraocular inflammation and damage when introduced intraocularly by different approaches and in varying doses. John A. Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Experimental study. Commercial topical azithromycin 1.0% was duplicated, including the benzalkonium chloride, but without inclusion of the Durasite bioadhesive drug-delivery system. Injections of 50 μL, 25 μL, and 10 μL of the antibiotic solutions were administered in a masked fashion to 2 rabbits; 1 eye (study eye) in each rabbit was randomized to receive azithromycin with the delivery system and the fellow eye (control eye) to receive azithromycin without the delivery system. Two rabbits had topical drops of each solution placed after a 2.8 mm incision was created. Masked slitlamp examinations, pachymetry, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were determined 1 day and 2 days postoperatively. The animals were humanely killed, and the endothelial density and histopathology were examined. The IOP (P<.001), pachymetry (P<.001), and signs of inflammation (P=.38 to .003) were consistently higher in the study eye, especially at the 50 μL dose, than in the control eye. This was confirmed by histopathology. If the drug-delivery system gains access to the anterior chamber, it may cause substantial corneal edema and inflammation, even at low doses and after topical administration.
    Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 11/2011; 38(1):137-45. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.038 · 2.55 Impact Factor