Identification and structural characterization of FYVE domain-containing proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Department of Biology, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
BMC Plant Biology (Impact Factor: 3.94). 01/2010; 10:157. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-157
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT FYVE domains have emerged as membrane-targeting domains highly specific for phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PtdIns(3)P). They are predominantly found in proteins involved in various trafficking pathways. Although FYVE domains may function as individual modules, dimers or in partnership with other proteins, structurally, all FYVE domains share a fold comprising two small characteristic double-stranded beta-sheets, and a C-terminal alpha-helix, which houses eight conserved Zn2+ ion-binding cysteines. To date, the structural, biochemical, and biophysical mechanisms for subcellular targeting of FYVE domains for proteins from various model organisms have been worked out but plant FYVE domains remain noticeably under-investigated.
We carried out an extensive examination of all Arabidopsis FYVE domains, including their identification, classification, molecular modeling and biophysical characterization using computational approaches. Our classification of fifteen Arabidopsis FYVE proteins at the outset reveals unique domain architectures for FYVE containing proteins, which are not paralleled in other organisms. Detailed sequence analysis and biophysical characterization of the structural models are used to predict membrane interaction mechanisms previously described for other FYVE domains and their subtle variations as well as novel mechanisms that seem to be specific to plants.
Our study contributes to the understanding of the molecular basis of FYVE-based membrane targeting in plants on a genomic scale. The results show that FYVE domain containing proteins in plants have evolved to incorporate significant differences from those in other organisms implying that they play a unique role in plant signaling pathways and/or play similar/parallel roles in signaling to other organisms but use different protein players/signaling mechanisms.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PRAF proteins are present in all plants, but their functions remain unclear. We investigated the role of one member of the PRAF family, MtZR1, on the development of roots and nitrogen-fixing nodules in Medicago truncatula. We found that MtZR1 was expressed in all M. truncatula organs. Spatiotemporal analysis showed that MtZR1 expression in M. truncatula roots was mostly limited to the root meristem and the vascular bundles of mature nodules. MtZR1 expression in root nodules was down-regulated in response to various abiotic stresses known to affect nitrogen fixation efficiency. The down-regulation of MtZR1 expression by RNA interference in transgenic roots decreased root growth and impaired nodule development and function. MtZR1 overexpression resulted in longer roots and significant changes to nodule development. Our data thus indicate that MtZR1 is involved in the development of roots and nodules. To our knowledge, this work provides the first in vivo experimental evidence of a biological role for a typical PRAF protein in plants.
    Plant Cell and Environment 08/2013; · 5.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Formins are evolutionarily conserved eukaryotic proteins participating in actin and microtubule organization. Land plants have three formin clades, with only two - Class I and II - present in angiosperms. Class I formins are often transmembrane proteins, residing at the plasmalemma and anchoring the cortical cytoskeleton across the membrane to the cell wall, while Class II formins possess a PTEN-related membrane-binding domain. Lower plant Class III and non-plant formins usually contain domains predicted to bind RHO GTPases that are membrane-associated. Thus, some kind of membrane anchorage appears to be a common formin feature. Direct interactions between various non-plant formins and integral or peripheral membrane proteins have indeed been reported, with varying mechanisms and biological implications. Besides of summarizing new data on Class I and Class II formin-membrane relationships, this review surveys such "non-classical" formin-membrane interactions and examines which, if any, of them may be evolutionarily conserved and operating also in plants. FYVE, SH3 and BAR domain-containing proteins emerge as possible candidates for such conserved membrane-associated formin partners.
    Frontiers in Plant Science 01/2013; 4:436. · 3.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endomembrane protein trafficking assures protein location through the endocytic and secretory routes. Trafficking pathways are diverse, depending on the proteins being trafficked, the final destination as well as their itinerary. Trafficking pathways are operated by machineries composed of a set of coordinately acting factors that transport proteins between compartments. Different machineries participate in each protein trafficking pathway, providing specificity and accuracy. Changes in the activity and abundance of trafficking proteins regulate protein flux. The preponderance of one pathway over another regulates protein location and relocation. Cellular requirements change during different processes and in response to stimuli; modulation of trafficking mechanisms must relocate proteins or alternatively increase/decrease the targeting rate of certain proteins. Conventionally, protein trafficking modulation has been explained as posttranslational modification of components of the relevant trafficking machinery. However, trafficking components are also transcriptionally regulated and several reports support that this regulation can modulate protein trafficking as well. This transcriptional modulation has an impact on plant physiology, and is a critical and fundamental mechanism. This scenario suggests a determinant mechanism that must be considered in the endomembrane protein trafficking research field.
    Plant Science 08/2014; · 4.11 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Available from