Article

An intraocular lens power calculation formula based on optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.

Center for Ophthalmic Optics and Lasers, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.
Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J.: 1995) (Impact Factor: 2.78). 06/2010; 26(6):430-7. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090710-02
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To develop an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) that would not be biased by previous laser vision correction.
Twenty-seven eyes of 27 cataract patients without prior laser vision correction who underwent phacoemulsification were included in the study. An optical coherence biometer (IOLMaster, Carl Zeiss Meditec) measured anterior corneal curvature and axial eye length. A high-speed (2000 Hz) anterior segment OCT prototype mapped corneal thickness and measured anterior chamber depth and crystalline lens thickness. Posterior corneal curvature was computed by combining IOLMaster keratometry with OCT corneal thickness mapping. A new IOL formula was developed based on these parameters. One month after phacoemulsification, the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was measured. The prediction error in postoperative MRSE of the OCT-based IOL formula was compared with that of three theoretic formulae: SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay II.
The mean prediction error in postoperative MRSE of the OCT-based formula was 0.04+/-0.44 diopters (D). The SRK/T was the best of the theoretic formulae, and its prediction error was -0.35+/-0.42 D. Twenty-one (78%) eyes were within 0.50 D using the OCT formula compared to 18 (67%) eyes using the SRK/T. No statistically significant differences were noted among the formulae.
For cataract patients without prior laser vision correction, the OCT-based IOL formula was as accurate as the current theoretic formulae. This new formula is based on direct OCT assessment of the posterior curvature and avoids the calculation errors inherent in conventional IOL formulae.

1 Follower
 · 
92 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A full-wave zero-voltage switching quasiresonant converter flyback converter with a novel multiloop control was built which operates over the range of input voltage and load of a typical distributed-system power supply. The maximum converter frequency of 880 kHz is shown to be close to the practical limit for this specific application. Reasonable full-load efficiency is achieved, and the predicted losses agree with actual circuit measurements. The multiloop control scheme provides noise-immune and stable control over the full operating range of the converter. Design guidelines for the control are given, and it is shown theoretical and measured small-signal performance are in agreement. Performance and stress predictions are also very close to measurements
    Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 1988. APEC '88. Conference Proceedings 1988., Third Annual IEEE; 03/1988
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study the accuracy and repeatability of anterior, posterior, and net corneal power measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA. Cross-sectional study. A Fourier-domain OCT system (RTVue) was used to scan normal eyes, eyes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and keratoconic eyes. After the corneal surfaces were delineated, the system calculated anterior and posterior corneal powers by curve fitting over the central 3.0 mm diameter area. Net corneal power was calculated using a thick-lens formula. The repeatability of the calculations was evaluated by the pooled standard deviation of 3 measurements from the same visit. The net corneal power values were compared with standard automated keratometry measurements (IOLMaster). The repeatability of Fourier-domain OCT net corneal power was 0.19 diopters (D), 0.26 D, and 0.30 D in the normal, post-LASIK, and keratoconus groups, respectively. The Fourier-domain OCT net corneal power was significantly lower than keratometry by a mean of -1.21 D, -2.89 D, and -3.07 D, respectively (P<.001). The anterior-posterior curvature ratio was lower in post-LASIK and keratoconic eyes than in normal eyes (P<.001). Corneal power measured by Fourier-domain OCT achieved good repeatability in all 3 groups. The repeatability was better than slower time-domain OCT systems. Because Fourier-domain OCT directly measures both anterior and posterior corneal surfaces, it may produce more consistent results than standard keratometry in post-LASIK and keratoconic eyes in which the anterior-posterior corneal curvature ratios are altered by surgery or disease.
    Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 12/2010; 36(12):2115-22. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.018 · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obtaining precise postoperative target refraction is of utmost importance in today's modern cataract and refractive surgery. Given the growing number of patients undergoing premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantations, patient expectation continues to rise. In order to meet heightened patient expectations, it is crucial to pay utmost attention to patient selection, accurate keratometry and biometry readings, as well as to the application of correct IOL power formula with optimized lens constants. This article reviews recent advances in the field of clinical biometry and IOL power calculations. Recently developed low-coherence reflectometry optical biometry is comparable to older ultrasonic biometric and keratometric techniques. In addition, the new IOLMaster software upgrade has improved reproducibility and enhanced signal acquisition. Further, the modern lens power formulas currently determine the effective lens position and the shape of the intraocular lens power prediction curve more accurately. In order to reach target refraction, precise biometric measurements are imperative. Understanding the strengths and limitations of the currently available biometry devices allows prevention of high variability and inaccuracy, ultimately determining the refractive outcomes.
    Current opinion in ophthalmology 11/2011; 23(1):47-53. DOI:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd63e · 2.64 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
2 Downloads
Available from