Reliability of physical examination tests used in the assessment of patients with shoulder problems: a systematic review.

Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S10 2BP, UK.
Physiotherapy (Impact Factor: 2.11). 09/2010; 96(3):179-90. DOI: 10.1016/
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Shoulder pain is a common clinical problem, and numerous tests are used to diagnose structural pathology.
To systematically review the reliability of physical examination procedures used in the clinical examination of patients with shoulder pain.
MEDLINE, PEDro, AMED, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library (2009) and CINAHL were searched from the earliest record on the database to June 2009.
Reliability studies that included any patients with shoulder pain were analysed for their quality and reliability results.
Pre-established criteria were used to judge the quality of the studies (high quality >60% methods score) and satisfactory levels of reliability (kappa or intraclass correlation coefficient > or =0.85, sensitivity analysis 0.70). A qualitative synthesis was performed based on levels of evidence.
Thirty-six studies were included with a mean methods score of 57%. Seventeen studies were deemed to be of high quality; high-quality studies were less likely to meet the pre-agreed level of reliability. The majority of studies indicated poor reliability for all procedures investigated.
Overall, the evidence regarding reliability was contradictory.
There is no consistent evidence that any examination procedure used in shoulder assessments has acceptable levels of reliability. Alternate methods of classification which are reliable should be used to classify patients with shoulder problems.


Available from: Chris Littlewood, Dec 18, 2014
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the inter-examiner reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT)-trained diplomats in classifying patients with shoulder disorders. The MDT system has demonstrated acceptable reliability when used in patients with spinal disorders; however, little is known about its utility when used for appendicular conditions.
    The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy 11/2014; 22(4):199-205. DOI:10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000068
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Muscular recovery of structural integrity after arthroscopic Bankart repair using the para- and trans-musculotendinous three-portal technique has not been investigated. Twenty-seven athletes [mean age 26.9 years, (group 1; G1)] were prospectively and longitudinally monitored after arthroscopic Bankart repair using the three-portal technique by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and specific clinical muscular testing. The muscular integrity was assessed at the subscapularis (SSC) for the para-tendinous anteroinferior portal, the supraspinatus (SSP) for the trans-tendinous suprabicipital portal, and the infraspinatus (ISP) for the trans-tendinous posterior portal. Muscular atrophy was assessed by standardized ratios of transverse and vertical diameters for the SSC and ISP, as defined by cross-sectional area ratios for the SSP. Fatty infiltration was assessed by signal intensity analysis for the upper and lower SSC, SSP, and upper ISP as a ratio with the lower ISP. These parameters were analyzed for pre-operative (T0), 1-year (T1), and 2-year status (T2), and compared to 27 healthy volunteers [mean age 29.4 years, (group 2, G2)]. The structural integrity assessments were performed after 14.8 (T1) and 32.0 months (T2). The SSC analysis revealed no muscular impairments in the upper and lower portions between T0 and T2 or compared to G2. MRI analysis for SSP and ISP showed full muscular recovery without any changes between T0 and T2 or deficits compared to G2. The number of pre-operative dislocations had no influence on the muscular integrity. MR analysis detected signs of overuse syndrome in 15 % at T0, 41 % at T1, and 63 % at T2; 77, 22, and 26 % of patients at T0, T1, and T2, respectively, were symptomatic. Arthroscopic Bankart repair using the three-portal technique prevents full muscular integrity for para-tendinous anteroinferior portals at the SSC, the trans-tendinous suprabicipital portal through the SSP, and the trans-tendinous portal through the ISP.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 02/2015; 135(3). DOI:10.1007/s00402-015-2158-1 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Shoulder complaints are among the commonest causes of musculoskeletal pain. They are potentially disabling and frequently cause absenteeism from work and claims for sickness benefits. One of the most prevalent subtypes of shoulder pain is impingement. This is often managed physiotherapeutically, with 'hands-on' manual therapy and exercises being mainstays. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of manual therapy and exercises to improve pain, disability and function in people with shoulder impingement. Methods: A systematic review was conducted including systematic reviews, quasi-randomized trials and randomized controlled trials published up to October 2008. Searches included the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, Cinahl and PEDro. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed with appropriate instruments. All findings were critically analysed and discussed, and summary conclusions formulated. Results: Eight systematic reviews and six randomized controlled trials were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias as well as population and treatment parameters varied. Clinical heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis, thus all findings were synthesized narratively. The included research provides limited evidence to support the use of manual therapy and exercise interventions for shoulder impingement. This primarily relates to subacute and chronic conditions and short to medium-term effectiveness. Conclusions: Manual therapy and exercise seem effective for shoulder impingement, but varying methodological quality and risk of bias in reviews and trials warrant caution in the interpretation of the results. There is a need for further good-quality primary research.
    Physical Therapy Reviews 03/2010; 15(2):62-83. DOI:10.1179/174328810X12786297204675