Article

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Reduces Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients Treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics (Impact Factor: 4.18). 11/2007; 69(3):S10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT PURPOSE: Androgen deprivation therapy (AD) has been shown to increase late ≥ grade 2 rectal toxicity when used concurrently with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has the potential to reduce toxicity by limiting the radiation dose received by the bowel and bladder. This study compares both genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in men treated with 3DCRT+AD versus IMRT+AD. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From July 1992 to July 2004, 293 men received 3DCRT (n=170) or IMRT (n=123) with concurrent AD (< 6 months, n=123; ≥ 6 months, n =170). Median RT doses were 76 Gy for 3DCRT (ICRU) and 76 Gy for IMRT (95% to the PTV). Toxicity was assessed by a patient symptom questionnaire assessing toxicity completed at each visit and recorded using a modified late effects normal tissue task force radiation morbidity scale (LENT). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 86 months (SD=29.3) for the 3DCRT group and 40 months (SD=9.7) for the IMRT group. Acute GI toxicity (OR=4, 95% CI: 1.6-11.7, p=0.005) was significantly higher with 3DCRT than with IMRT and was independent of AD duration (i.e. <6 vs. ≥6 months). Time to development of late GI toxicity was significantly longer in the IMRT group. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for ≥ grade 2 GI toxicity were 20% for 3DCRT versus 8% for IMRT (p=0.01). On MVA, ≥ grade 2 late GI toxicity (HR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-4.3, p=0.04) was more prevalent in 3DCRT patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 3DCRT, IMRT significantly decreased acute and late GI toxicity in patients treated with AD.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Navesh K Sharma, Jan 21, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
69 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer improves biochemical and clinical disease-free survival. While comparisons in intact prostate cancer show a benefit for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over 3D conformal planning, this has not been studied for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (RT). This study compares normal tissue and target dosimetry and radiobiological modeling of IMRT vs. 3D conformal planning in the postoperative setting. 3D conformal plans were designed for 15 patients who had been treated with IMRT planning for salvage post-prostatectomy RT. The same computed tomography (CT) and target/normal structure contours, as well as prescription dose, was used for both IMRT and 3D plans. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were calculated based on the dose given to the bladder and rectum by both plans. Dose-volume histogram and NTCP data were compared by paired t-test. Bladder and rectal sparing were improved with IMRT planning compared to 3D conformal planning. The volume of the bladder receiving at least 75% (V75) and 50% (V50) of the dose was significantly reduced by 28% and 17%, respectively (p = 0.002 and 0.037). Rectal dose was similarly reduced, V75 by 33% and V50 by 17% (p = 0.001 and 0.004). While there was no difference in the volume of rectum receiving at least 65 Gy (V65), IMRT planning significant reduced the volume receiving 40 Gy or more (V40, p = 0.009). Bladder V40 and V65 were not significantly different between planning modalities. Despite these dosimetric differences, there was no significant difference in the NTCP for either bladder or rectal injury. IMRT planning reduces the volume of bladder and rectum receiving high doses during post-prostatectomy RT. Because of relatively low doses given to the bladder and rectum, there was no statistically significant improvement in NTCP between the 3D conformal and IMRT plans.
    Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 02/2009; 34(3):256-60. DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2008.10.005 · 0.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine prospectively intermediate-term toxicity and quality of life (QoL) of prostate cancer patients after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Fifty-five patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were treated by IMRT (76 Gy). Physicians scored acute and late toxicity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Patients assessed general and prostate-specific QoL before IMRT (baseline) and at 2, 6, and 18 months using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires QLQ-C30(+3) and QLQ-PR25. Median age was 73 years (range, 54-80 years). Risk categories were 18% low risk, 60% intermediate risk, and 22% high risk; 45% of patients received hormonal therapy (median duration, 6 months). The incidence of urinary and bowel toxicity immediately after IMRT was, respectively, 38% and 13% (Grade 2) and 2% and none (Grade 3); at 18 months it was 15% and 11% (Grade 2) and none (Grade 3). Significant worsening of QoL was reported at 2 months with regard to fatigue (+11.31, p = 1.10(-7)), urinary symptoms (+9.07, p = 3.10(-11)), dyspnea (+7.27, p = 0.008), and emotional (-7.02, p = 0.002), social (-6.36, p = 0.003), cognitive (-4.85, p = 0.004), and physical (-3.39, p = 0.007) functioning. Only fatigue (+5.86, p = 0.003) and urinary symptoms (+5.86, p = 0.0004) had not improved by 6 months. By 18 months all QoL scores except those for dyspnea (+8.02, p = 0.01) and treatment-related symptoms (+4.24, p = 0.01) had returned to baseline. These adverse effects were exacerbated by hormonal therapy. High-dose IMRT with accurate positioning induces only a temporary worsening of QoL.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 10/2009; 77(4):1053-9. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.024 · 4.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Modern radiotherapy treatments can be optimized using dose-volume constraints which specify the volume of tumor and organs-at-risk receiving a given threshold dose. Careful derivation and evaluation of rectal constraints is essential to allow safe dose escalation in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. The authors present a new type of hybrid dosimetric constraint which comprises both volumetric and spatial factors of the dose-distribution. The authors also propose a framework to evaluate these constraints. The authors used data from the RT01 prostate radiotherapy trial (ISRCTN 47772397) to derive this set of hybrid constraints for the rectum based on measures extracted from dose-surface maps. For comparison, the authors also derive a set of dose-volume constraints. In order to evaluate these dosimetric constraints, the authors propose a new framework for predicting radiation-induced toxicities using Bayesian logistic regression with high-order interactions. The predictive power of the new RT01-based constraints, as well as of two sets of rectal dose-volume constraints proposed in the recent literature-The constraints proposed by other researchers [C. Fiorino, G. Fellin, T. Rancati, V. Vavassori, C. Bianchi, V. C. Borca, G. Girelli, M. Mapelli, L. Menegotti, S. Nava, and R. Valdagni, "Clinical and dosimetric predictors of late rectal syndrome after 3D-CRT for localized prostate cancer: Preliminary results of a multicenter prospective study," Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 70, 1130-1137 (2008)] and the constraints used in the conventional or hypofractionated high dose intensity modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer (CHHiP) trial [C. P. South, V. S. Khoo, O. Naismith, A. Norman, and D. P. Dearnaley, "A comparison of treatment planning techniques used in two randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trials for localised prostate cancer," Clin. Oncol. (R Coll. Radiol) 20, 15-21 (2008)]--were evaluated using a tenfold cross-validation with follow-up data from the RT01 trial. The predictive power was quantified using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Toxicities considered were rectal bleeding, loose stools, and a global toxicity score. Dose-volume constraints had less predictive power than the new type of hybrid constraints. A probabilistic model for predicting rectal bleeding based on the dose-volume constraints proposed by other researchers [C. Fiorino, G. Fellin, T. Rancati, V. Vavassori, C. Bianchi, V. C. Borca, G. Girelli, M. Mapelli, L. Menegotti, S. Nava, and R. Valdagni, "Clinical and dosimetric predictors of late rectal syndrome after 3D-CRT for localized prostate cancer: Preliminary results of a multicenter prospective study," Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 70, 1130-1137 (2008)], the CHHiP dose-volume constraints, the RT01-based dose-volume constraints, and the hybrid constraints resulted in average areas under the ROC curves of 0.56, 0.58, 0.62, and 0.67, respectively. For predicting loose stools, the corresponding values were 0.57, 0.53, 0.66, and 0.71, respectively. The areas under the respective ROC curves for predicting the global toxicity score were 0.58, 0.55, 0.61, and 0.63. Thus, imposing the new type of hybrid constraints when generating a treatment plan should result in a reduction in the incidence of radiation-induced late rectal toxicity.
    Medical Physics 04/2010; 37(4):1768-77. DOI:10.1118/1.3367013 · 3.01 Impact Factor