Article

XBP-1 Couples Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress to Augmented IFN-beta Induction via a cis-Acting Enhancer in Macrophages

Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
The Journal of Immunology (Impact Factor: 5.36). 08/2010; 185(4):2324-30. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903052
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Perturbation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) results in a conserved stress response called the unfolded protein response (UPR). Macrophages undergoing a UPR respond to LPS with log-fold increased production of IFN-beta, a cytokine with diverse roles in innate and adaptive immunity. In this study, we found that thapsigargin-induced ER stress augmented recruitment of IFN regulatory factor-3, CREB binding protein/p300, and transcriptional machinery to the murine ifnb1 promoter during LPS stimulation. Although full synergistic IFN-beta production requires X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1), this UPR-regulated transcription factor did not appreciably bind the ifnb1 promoter. However, XBP-1 bound a conserved site 6.1 kb downstream of ifnb1, along with IFN regulatory factor-3 and CREB binding protein only during concomitant UPR and LPS stimulation. XBP-1 physically associates with p300, suggesting a mechanism of multimolecular assembly at the +6.1 kb site. Luciferase reporter assays provide evidence this +6 kb region functions as an XBP-1-dependent enhancer of ifnb1 promoter activity. Thus, this study identifies a novel role for a UPR-dependent transcription factor in the regulation of an inflammatory cytokine. Our findings have broader mechanistic implications for the pathogenesis of diseases involving ER stress and type I IFN, including viral infection, ischemia-reperfusion injury, protein misfolding, and inflammatory diseases.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
123 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) has been increasingly recognized as an important mechanism in various liver diseases. However, its intrinsic physiological role in acute liver failure (ALF) remains largely undetermined. This study aimed to examine how ER stress orchestrates glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) and inflammation to affect ALF. In a murine ALF model induced by D-galactosamine (D-GalN) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA) is to be administered to relieve ER stress. The lethality rate, liver damage, cytokine expression, and the activity of GSK3β were evaluated. How to regulate LPS-induced inflammation and TNF-α-induced hepatocyte apoptosis by ER stress was investigated in vitro. In vivo, ER stress was triggered in the liver with the progression of mice ALF model. ER stress was essential for the development of ALF because ER stress inhibition by 4-PBA ameliorated the liver damage through decreasing liver inflammation and hepatocyte apoptosis. 4-PBA also decreased GSK3β activity in the livers of ALF mice. In vitro, ER stress induced by tunicamycin synergistically increased LPS-triggered pro-inflammatory cytokine induction and promoted the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in bone marrow-derived macrophages; moreover, tunicamycin also cooperated with TNF-α to increase hepatocyte apoptosis. ER stress promoted LPS-triggered inflammation depending on GSK3β activation because inhibition of GSK3β by SB216763, the specific inhibitor of GSK3β, resulted in downregulation of pro-inflammatory genes. ER stress contributes to liver inflammation and hepatotoxicity in ALF, particularly by regulating GSK3β, and is therefore a potential therapeutic target for ALF.
    Inflammation 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10753-014-0080-2 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Immune responses occur in the midst of a variety of cellular stresses that can severely perturb endoplasmic reticulum (ER) function. The unfolded protein response is a three-pronged signaling axis dedicated to preserving ER homeostasis. In this review, we highlight many important and emerging functional roles for ER stress in immunity, focusing on how the bidirectional cross talk between immunological processes and basic cell biology leads to pleiotropic signaling outcomes and enhanced sensitivity to inflammatory stimuli. We also discuss how dysregulated ER stress responses can provoke many diseases, including autoimmunity, firmly positioning the unfolded protein response as a major therapeutic target in human disease. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Immunology Volume 33 is March 21, 2015. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.
    Annual Review of Immunology 12/2014; DOI:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112116 · 41.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cells undergoing an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response called the “Unfolded Protein Response” (UPR) produce synergistically augmented IFN-β when stimulated with pattern recognition receptor agonists such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Previous studies revealed increased IRF3 at ifnb1 genetic regulatory elements during ER stress; however the underlying mechanism was unclear [1]. In this study we sought to determine whether ER stress directly activated IRF3.Methods This study was conducted in murine macrophages (primary and RAW264.7) and STING−/− or +/+ murine embryonic fibroblasts. IRF3 activation was monitored by immunofluorescence microscopy and western blot detection of S386 and S396 respectively as well as IRF3 nuclear translocation. IRF3 regulated gene expression was detected by quantitative PCR. TBK1 family kinases were inhibited with MRT67307. Site-1 protease cleavage of ATF6 was blocked with AEBSF.ResultsOxygen-glucose deprivation and multiple pharmacologic UPR inducers triggered the phosphorylation (S386) and nuclear translocation of IRF3, even in the absence of exogenous LPS. UPR induction also enhanced LPS-dependent phosphorylation of IRF3 at S396. Consistent with IRF3 activation, ER stress augmented LPS-dependent induction of several IRF3 regulated genes (IFN-β, IFN-α4, and CXCL10) but not others (ISG54, RANTES). Further mechanistic dissection revealed differences among UPR inducers: IRF3 phosphorylation due to calcium-mobilizing ER stress (thapsigargin or A23187) critically depended upon Stimulator of interferon gene (STING) and Tank-binding kinase (TBK1). However, calcium mobilization alone by ionomycin was insufficient for IRF3 phosphorylation. STING was also necessary for optimal synergistic induction of IFN-βby thapsigargin and LPS. In contrast, non-calcium-dependent forms of ER stress (e.g., tunicamycin treatment, oxygen glucose deprivation, 2-deoxyglucose) promoted IRF3 phosphorylation independently of STING and TBK1. Rather, IRF3 phosphorylation and synergistic IFN-βinduction by these UPR inducers was abrogated by AEBSF, an inhibitor of ATF6 processing. AEBSF had no effect on thapsigargin induced IRF3 phosphorylation or IFN-β synergy.Conclusion Discrete IRF3 activating pathways were identified for different types of ER stress that involved either STING/TBK1 or Site-1 specific proteases (e.g. ATF6). The activation of STING by ER stress has not been described. Although ER stress is not sufficient for expression of IRF3-regulated genes, activation of IRF3 by the UPR plays a critical role in augmenting LPS-dependent expression, as interference in this process severely impacted IFN-β induction. These data have implications for diseases involving ER stress and type I IFN.
    Cytokine 09/2012; 59(3):560-561. DOI:10.1016/j.cyto.2012.06.221 · 2.87 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from