Article
Molecular quantification of respiratory syncytial virus in respiratory samples: reliable detection during the initial phase of infection.
Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Journal of clinical microbiology (impact factor:
4.16).
10/2010;
48(10):3569-74.
DOI:10.1128/JCM.00097-10
pp.3569-74
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: A sensitive assay for virus discovery in respiratory clinical samples.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In 5-40% of respiratory infections in children, the diagnostics remain negative, suggesting that the patients might be infected with a yet unknown pathogen. Virus discovery cDNA-AFLP (VIDISCA) is a virus discovery method based on recognition of restriction enzyme cleavage sites, ligation of adaptors and subsequent amplification by PCR. However, direct discovery of unknown pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs is difficult due to the high concentration of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) that acts as competitor. In the current study we optimized VIDISCA by adjusting the reverse transcription enzymes and decreasing rRNA amplification in the reverse transcription, using hexamer oligonucleotides that do not anneal to rRNA. Residual cDNA synthesis on rRNA templates was further reduced with oligonucleotides that anneal to rRNA but can not be extended due to 3'-dideoxy-C6-modification. With these modifications >90% reduction of rRNA amplification was established. Further improvement of the VIDISCA sensitivity was obtained by high throughput sequencing (VIDISCA-454). Eighteen nasopharyngeal swabs were analysed, all containing known respiratory viruses. We could identify the proper virus in the majority of samples tested (11/18). The median load in the VIDISCA-454 positive samples was 7.2 E5 viral genome copies/ml (ranging from 1.4 E3-7.7 E6). Our results show that optimization of VIDISCA and subsequent high-throughput-sequencing enhances sensitivity drastically and provides the opportunity to perform virus discovery directly in patient material.PLoS ONE 01/2011; 6(1):e16118. · 4.09 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
20 patients
31 patients
Intrasample variation
lower airway disease
lower airways
lower viral loads
Nasopharyngeal aspirate samples
quantitative detection
reliable method
respiratory syncytial virus
RSV infection
RSV loads
RSV RNA
RSV RNA load
RSV RNA loads
step 1
step 2
step 3
undiluted mucus
viral loads