Recommendations for the validation of flow cytometric testing during drug development: I instrumentation

Department of Clinical Immunology, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 9132, USA.
Journal of immunological methods (Impact Factor: 1.82). 01/2011; 363(2):104-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.07.004
Source: PubMed


Flow cytometry is a powerful and flexible analytical tool used during all stages of drug development. While substantial effort is invested in development and validation of analytical methods, instrument validation is often neglected. Flow cytometers are evolving at a pace that surpasses the protracted timeline of drug discovery and development. Therefore, it becomes fundamentally important to the success of the study to document the validated state of the flow cytometer and verify data integrity at the time of study conduct. It is important to bear in mind that validation strategies are critical components of the entire process involved in bringing new therapeutic options to the medical community; drugs which eventually manifest as successful new treatments for those individuals afflicted with disease. Formal industry guidance is provided through Good Laboratory Practices [GLP], which require validation of all computerized systems and equipment used to support pre-clinical studies for regulatory submissions. Key elements of instrument validation processes have been delineated through guidance documents published by regulatory agencies and industry working groups to support the rigorous compliance needs of GLP. However, most testing to support drug development is conducted in less strict regulatory environments. Such comprehensive validation efforts may not be appropriate for laboratories supporting early discovery or basic research, however, laboratories involved in regulated stages of development, such as pre-clinical and clinical phases, should consider these recommendations. This paper presents a consensus methodological approach that the authors have used successfully to ensure data integrity in flow cytometric studies conducted during drug development.

1 Follower
130 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Analysis of peripheral blood leukocyte populations by flow cytometry in adult beagles is a critical component of immunotoxicity assessment in regulated pre-clinical toxicology studies. In this study, data is presented utilizing a single panel, six-color method to simultaneously enumerate absolute cell counts and determine the relative percentage of leukocytes. A GLP validation was performed to determine intra- and inter-assay variance, inter-instrument variance, and pre- and post-fixation stability for the target populations. The results demonstrated all samples met acceptance criteria, CV values less than 25%, for all precision and stability intervals assessed. The intra and inter-assay data demonstrated the single panel method generated acceptable precision. Furthermore, stability results indicated whole blood samples and processed samples may be stored without a statistically significant difference in the data compared to samples immediately processed and analyzed after blood collection. This assay will provide researchers a more precise and efficient tool to evaluate the immunotoxic effects of a test article on canine peripheral blood leukocytes during pre-clinical drug testing.
    Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 04/2013; 154(1-2). DOI:10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.04.005 · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this manuscript is to present an approach for evaluating specimen stability for flow cytometric methods used during drug development. While this approach specifically addresses stability assessment for assays to be used in clinical trials with centralized testing facilities, the concepts can be applied to any stability assessment for flow cytometric methods. The proposed approach is implemented during assay development and optimization, and includes suggestions for designing a stability assessment plan, data evaluation and acceptance criteria. Given that no single solution will be applicable in all scenarios, this manuscript offers the reader a roadmap for stability assessment and is intended to guide the investigator during both the method development phase and in the experimental design of the validation plan. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Journal of Immunological Methods 02/2015; 418. DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2015.01.008 · 1.82 Impact Factor


130 Reads
Available from