Article

Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: an evaluation of four commonly used DNA extraction methods.

Centre for Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 23, P.O. Box 2461, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (Impact Factor: 3.69). 09/2010; 88(1):299-307. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2770-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The effectiveness of three commercially available direct DNA isolation kits (Mobio, Fast, Qiagen) and one published direct DNA extraction protocol (Bead) for extracting bacterial DNA from different types of activated sludge was investigated and mutually compared. The DNA quantity and purity were determined using real-time PCR targeting the bacterial 16S rDNA gene. Microbial community fingerprints were assessed by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. The resulting community profiles were analyzed with canonical correspondence analysis. Our results clearly demonstrate that direct DNA extraction methods can significantly influence the DNA quantity, purity, and observed community patterns of microbiota in activated sludge. Fast and Mobio generated high amounts of good quality DNA compared to Bead and Qiagen. Mobio also resulted in the detection of the highest number of species while Fast scored the best in discriminating between the community patterns of different activated sludge types. With respect to the characterization of community profiles, our analyses demonstrated a strong sludge type dependent variability among methods. Taking into account our results, we recommend Fast as the most suitable DNA extraction method for activated sludge samples used for bacterial community studies.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
272 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Soil is commonly used in forensic casework to provide discriminatory power to link a suspect to a crime scene. Standard analyses examine the intrinsic properties of soils, including mineralogy, geophysics, texture and colour; however, soils can also support a vast amount of organisms, which can be examined using DNA fingerprinting techniques. Many previous genetic analyses have relied on patterns of fragment length variation produced by amplification of unidentified taxa in the soil extract. In contrast, the development of advanced DNA sequencing technologies now provides the ability to generate a detailed picture of soil microbial communities and the taxa present, allowing for improved discrimination between samples. However, DNA must be efficiently extracted from the complex soil matrix to achieve accurate and reproducible DNA sequencing results, and extraction efficacy is highly dependent on the soil type and method used. As a result, a consideration of soil properties is important when estimating the likelihood of successful DNA extraction. This would include a basic understanding of soil components, their interactions with DNA molecules and the factors that affect such interactions. This review highlights some important considerations required prior to DNA extraction and discusses the use of common chemical reagents in soil DNA extraction protocols to achieve maximum efficacy. Together, the information presented here is designed to facilitate informed decisions about the most appropriate sampling and extraction methodology, relevant both to the soil type and the details of a specific forensic case, to ensure sufficient DNA yield and enable successful analysis.
    Science & Justice 01/2014; · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cross-flow filtration experiments were performed using three model biofoulants with increasing complexity: a monospecies assay using Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Escherichia coli, a duospecies assay using both microorganisms, and finally a multispecies assay using activated sludge spiked with P. aeruginosa. Three different microfiltration membranes were tested: polyvinyldifluoride, polyethylene and polysulfone. The biofouling was characterized in terms of cell density, community composition and relative permeability decrease caused by the different biofoulants. The data show that a good biofilm pioneer, like P. aeruginosa, was able to bind to any kind of membrane. However, when activated sludge spiked with P. aeruginosa was used, an enhanced biofouling behavior by the activated sludge members was found on the polyvinyldifluoride membrane. This paper highlights the importance of the kind of species, the microbial interactions and the community composition during the biofouling development.
    Journal of Membrane Science 01/2014; 453:394–401. · 4.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Four commercial DNA extraction kits and a minor modification in the DNA elution procedure were evaluated for the quantitation of bacteria in pig manure samples. The PowerSoil®, PowerFecal®, NucleoSpin® Soil kits and QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini kit were tested on raw manure samples and on lagoon effluents for their ability to quantify total bacteria and a subdominant bacteria specific of pig manure contamination: Lactobacillus amylovorus. The NucleoSpin® Soil kit (NS kit), and to a lesser extent the PowerFecal® kit were the most efficient methods. Regardless of the kit utilized, the modified elution procedure increased DNA yield in the lagoon effluent by a factor of 1.4 to 1.8. When tested on 10 piggery effluent samples, compared to the QIAamp kit, the NS kit combined with the modified elution step, increased by a factor up to 1.7 log10 the values of the concentration of L. amylovorus. Regardless of the type of manure, the best DNA quality and the highest concentrations of bacteria were obtained using the NS kit combined with the modification of the elution procedure. The method recommended here significantly improved quantitation of subdominant bacteria in manure.
    MicrobiologyOpen. 05/2014;

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
65 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014