Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols Must Be Considered When Determining Optimal Perioperative Care in Colorectal Surgery

Annals of surgery (Impact Factor: 8.33). 08/2010; 252(2):409; author reply 409-10. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e9d947
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: Tarik Sammour, Nov 15, 2014
25 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Fast-track (FT) surgery can be defined as a coordinated perioperative approach aimed at reducing surgical stress and facilitating postoperative recovery. The objective of this review was to examine the literature on the procedure-specific application of FT surgery. Discussion: The concept of FT rehabilitation has been applied mainly in colorectal surgery, but positive data have appeared also in other areas such as orthopedic, hepatopancreaticobiliary, urological, upper gastrointestinal, gynecological, thoracic, vascular, endocrine, breast, and pediatric surgeries. There is very little experience with comprehensive FT programs in cardiac surgery or trauma. Quantitative analysis from randomized trials and cohort studies suggest that FT is effective in reducing hospital stay without increased adverse events. Other benefits of the FT approach include a reduction in complications, ileus, fatigue, pain, and hospital expenses. However, despite clear benefits of FT care, implementation in daily practice has been slow. Further efforts must be undertaken to secure implementation in routine clinical practice. Standardized FT protocols should be provided on a procedure-specific basis.
    Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery 09/2012; 398(1). DOI:10.1007/s00423-012-1006-9 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have recently been developed in order to reduce morbidity, improve recovery, and shorten hospital stays of surgical patients. Since the 1990s, ERAS programs have been successfully applied in many centres, especially in northern Europe and America, to perioperative management for colorectal surgery, vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, and then also to urological and gynaecologic surgery. Purpose of this paper is to evaluate and discuss the very recent introduction of ERAS programs also in head and neck surgery. Embase and Pubmed database searches were performed for relevant published studies. There are still no reports concerning the results of the application of ERAS protocols in the head and neck field. ERAS programs, however, could offer also to head and neck surgery patients an advantage in terms of fastening recovery, reducing hospital stay, and favouring early return to daily activities after hospital discharge. Therefore, the investigation of specific ERAS protocol in head and neck surgery patients should be encouraged.
    Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 04/2013; DOI:10.1007/s00405-013-2502-4 · 1.55 Impact Factor