Article

The POLISMAIL lesson: sublingual immunotherapy may be prescribed also in polysensitized patients.

International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology (Impact Factor: 2.51). 01/2010; 23(2):637-40.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Polysensitization is a feature of allergic rhinitis (AR) that significantly impairs the quality of life (QoL) of AR patients. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only causal therapy for AR. However, the polysensitization phenomenon may represent a crucial obstacle as far as it concerns the choice of the allergen extract which should be used for immunotherapy. Therefore, a real-life based multi-centre study, named POLISMAIL, has been designed which aims at evaluating the behaviour of some allergists managing polysensitized AR patients. The effect of two-year SLIT treatment in those patients was also evaluated. A single allergen extract was used for two-thirds of patients, whereas a mix of two allergens was chosen for the remaining patients. The severity grade of AR and the type of diagnosis were significantly improved by 2-year SLIT. In addition, SLIT significantly improved QoL. Both outcomes confirm that SLIT with one or two allergen extracts achieves a significant improvement in polysensitized patients. In conclusion, the POLISMAIL study demonstrates that polysensitization should not represent a counter-indication for prescribing immunotherapy. The choice to limit SLIT to 1-2 allergen extracts was sufficient and effective in improving symptoms and QoL.

0 Followers
 · 
144 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has a clear evidence of efficacy and safety, as shown by a number of meta-analyses. However, a number of issues limit the use of AIT, many of them being not actually supported by solid data from the literature. In particular, several contraindications to AIT deserve to be argued, being needed to accurately balance in single cases the benefits versus the disadvantages. This concerns comorbidities, such as autoimmune diseases and malignancies, concomitant drug treatments, particularly β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, pregnancy, patient's age, the severity of asthma, allergen polysensitization and the period of starting the treatment. Another important aspect producing misconceptions on AIT is the quality of the allergen extracts, because currently a patient with respiratory allergy to a given source may be prescribed to treat his allergyby products with very different quality. Improving characterization and standardization of allergen extracts will pave the way to the general acknowledgment of AIT as an effective treatment.
    Immunotherapy 05/2014; 6(5):587-595. DOI:10.2217/imt.14.23 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attribution 3.0 license, which permits to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work in any medium, so long as the original work is properly cited. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work. Any republication, referencing or personal use of the work must explicitly identify the original source. Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. No responsibility is accepted for the accuracy of information contained in the published articles. The publisher assumes no responsibility for any damage or injury to persons or property arising out of the use of any materials, instructions, methods or ideas contained in the book. Publishing Process Manager Niksa Mandic Technical Editor Teodora Smiljanic Cover Designer Jan Hyrat Image Copyright Imagestalk, 2010. Used under license from Shutterstock.com
    October, 2011 edited by Yukihiro Shoyama, 10/2011; InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia., ISBN: 978-953-307-682-9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Polysensitisation is common in patients with respiratory allergy in Spain. Selection of the best allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is difficult in polysensitised patients. The present study was designed to help allergists better identify relevant allergens in these patients and to improve the selection of AIT in Spain. Sixty-two Spanish allergists answered a survey containing 88 items divided into four groups: 1) general approach to polysensitised subjects; 2) sensitisation profile involving mite, animal dander and moulds; 3) grass and olive pollen co-sensitisation, and 4) other pollen polysensitisation profile (weed and tree pollen). The Delphi method was used. A consensus was achieved for 83% of items (92%, 81%, 83% and 73% of the four groups analysed, respectively). Only polysensitised patients with clinical relevance should be considered polyallergic. A detailed medical history (clinical symptoms and medication) together with a profound knowledge of allergens present in the patient's environment are essential for diagnosis. Skin prick tests (SPTs) are not adequate to decide the clinical relevance of each allergen. Serum specific IgE against allergen sources adds value to SPT but molecular diagnosis, when possible, is strongly recommended, especially in pollen-allergic patients. Specific allergen challenge tests are difficult to perform and not recommended for daily practice. Regarding AIT composition, up to three allergens can be used in the same vaccine, but only related allergens may be mixed. In some cases more than one vaccine may be needed. Some criteria have been established to improve diagnosis and AIT prescription in polysensitised patients.