Article

Crystal structure of a truncated urease accessory protein UreF from Helicobacter pylori

Division of Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada.
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (Impact Factor: 2.92). 10/2010; 78(13):2839-48. DOI: 10.1002/prot.22802
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Urease plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori in humans. Maturation of this nickel metalloenzyme in bacteria requires the participation of the accessory proteins UreD (termed UreH in H. pylori), UreF, and UreG, which form sequential complexes with the urease apoprotein as well as UreE, a metallochaperone. Here, we describe the crystal structure of C-terminal truncated UreF from H. pylori (residues 1-233), the first UreF structure to be determined, at 1.55 A resolution using SAD methods. UreF forms a dimer in vitro and adopts an all-helical fold congruent with secondary structure prediction. On the basis of evolutionary conservation analysis, the structure reveals a probable binding surface for interaction with other urease components as well as key conserved residues of potential functional relevance.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Robert P Hausinger, Jun 24, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
123 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transition metals are both essential to enzymatic catalysis and limited in environmental availability. These two biological facts have together driven organisms to evolve mechanisms for selective metal ion sensing and utilization. Changes in metal ion concentrations are perceived by metal-dependent transcription factors and transduced into appropriate cellular responses, which regulate the machineries of competitive metal ion homeostasis and metallo-enzyme activation. The intrinsic toxicity of the majority of metal ions further creates a need for regulated intracellular trafficking, which is carried out by specific chaperones. The Ni(2+)-dependent urease enzymatic system serves as a paradigm for studying the strategies that cells use to handle an essential, yet toxic, metal ion. Although the discovery of urease as the first biological system for which nickel is essential for activity dates to 1975, the rationale for Ni(2+) selection, as well as the cascade of events involving metal-dependent gene regulation and protein-protein interactions leading to enzyme activation, have yet to be fully unraveled. The past 14 years since the Account by Hausinger and co-workers (Karplus, P. A.; Pearson, M. A.; Hausinger, R. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 330-337) have witnessed impressive achievements in the understanding of the biological chemistry of Ni(2+) in the urease system. In our Account, we discuss more recent advances in the comprehension of the specific role of Ni(2+) in the catalysis and the interplay between Ni(2+) and other metal ions, such as Zn(2+) and Fe(2+), in the metal-dependent enzyme activity. Our discussion focuses on work carried out in our laboratory. In particular, the structural features of the enzyme bound to inhibitors, substrate analogues, and transition state or intermediate analogues have shed light on the catalytic mechanism. Structural and functional information has been correlated to understand the Ni(2+) sensing effected by NikR, a nickel-dependent transcription factor. The urease activation process, involving insertion of Ni(2+) into the urease active site, has been in part dissected and analyzed through the investigation of the molecular properties of the accessory proteins UreD, UreF, and UreG. The intracellular trafficking of Ni(2+) has been rationalized through a deeper understanding of the structural and metal-binding properties of the metallo-chaperone UreE. All the while, a number of key general concepts have been revealed and developed. These include an understanding of (i) the overall ancillary role of Zn(2+) in nickel metabolism, (ii) the intrinsically disordered nature of the GTPase responsible for coupling the energy consumption to the carbon dioxide requirement for the urease activation process, and (iii) the role of the accessory proteins regulating this GTPase activity.
    Accounts of Chemical Research 05/2011; 44(7):520-30. DOI:10.1021/ar200041k · 24.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The analysis of the sequence of Helicobacter pylori UreD(H), an accessory protein involved in the activation of urease through the assembly of the Ni(2+)-containing active site, revealed the presence of two domains. The structure of these domains was calculated using threading and modeling algorithms. A search for putative binding sites on the protein surface was carried out using dedicated algorithms sensitive to either sequence conservation or structural similarity based on geometry and physicochemical properties. The results suggest that UreD(H) acts as a multifunctional molecular recognition platform facilitating the interaction between apo-urease and the ancillary proteins UreG, UreF, and UreE, responsible for nickel trafficking and delivering.
    Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 06/2011; 51(7):1513-20. DOI:10.1021/ci200183n · 4.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metalloenzymes often require elaborate metallocenter assembly systems to create functional active sites. The medically-important, dinuclear nickel enzyme urease provides an excellent model for studying metallocenter assembly. Nickel is inserted into the urease active site in a GTP-dependent process with the assistance of UreD/UreH, UreE, UreF, and UreG. These accessory proteins orchestrate apoprotein activation by delivering the appropriate metal, facilitating protein conformational changes, and possibly providing a requisite posttranslational modification. The activation mechanism and roles of each accessory protein in urease maturation is the subject of ongoing studies, with the latest findings presented in this review.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 03/2013; DOI:10.1074/jbc.R112.446526 · 4.60 Impact Factor