Computed tomography assessment of exogenous surfactant-induced lung reaeration in patients with acute lung injury

Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, UPMC Univ Paris 06, 47-83 boulevard de l'hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
Critical care (London, England) 07/2010; 14(4):R135. DOI: 10.1186/cc9186
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Previous randomized trials failed to demonstrate a decrease in mortality of patients with acute lung injury treated by exogenous surfactant. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the effects of exogenous porcine-derived surfactant on pulmonary reaeration and lung tissue in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS).
Twenty patients with ALI/ARDS were studied (10 treated by surfactant and 10 controls) in whom a spiral thoracic computed tomography scan was acquired before (baseline), 39 hours and 7 days after the first surfactant administration. In the surfactant group, 3 doses of porcine-derived lung surfactant (200 mg/kg/dose) were instilled in both lungs at 0, 12 and 36 hours. Each instillation was followed by recruitment maneuvers. Gas and tissue volumes were measured separately in poorly/nonaerated and normally aerated lung areas before and seven days after the first surfactant administration. Surfactant-induced lung reaeration was defined as an increase in gas volume in poorly/non-aerated lung areas between day seven and baseline compared to the control group.
At day seven, surfactant induced a significant increase in volume of gas in poorly/non-aerated lung areas (320 ± 125 ml versus 135 ± 161 ml in controls, P = 0.01) and a significant increase in volume of tissue in normally aerated lung areas (189 ± 179 ml versus -15 ± 105 ml in controls, P < 0.01). PaO2/FiO2 ratio was not different between the surfactant treated group and control group after surfactant replacement.
Intratracheal surfactant replacement induces a significant and prolonged lung reaeration. It also induces a significant increase in lung tissue in normally aerated lung areas, whose mechanisms remain to be elucidated.

Download full-text


Available from: Mao Zhang, Jun 17, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since publication of the Respiratory Management of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARMA) trial in 2000, use of tidal volume (VT) less than or equal to 6 mL/kg predicted body weight with corresponding plateau airway pressures (PPlat) less than or equal to 30 cm H2O has been advocated for acute lung injury. However, compliance with these recommendations is unknown. We therefore investigated VT (mL/kg predicted body weight) and PPlat (cm H2O) practices reported in studies of acute lung injury since ARMA using a systematic literature review (i.e., not a meta-analysis).
    Critical Care Medicine 08/2014; 42(10). DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000504 · 6.15 Impact Factor
  • Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 05/2011; 26(3):486-506. DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2011.03.010 · 1.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our previous studies in children with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome demonstrated improved outcomes with exogenous surfactant (calfactant) administration. Sample sizes in those studies were small, however, and the subject populations heterogeneous, thus making recommendations tenuous. To investigate the efficacy of surfactant administration in a larger, more homogenous population of children with lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome due to direct lung injury. Masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 24 children's hospitals in six different countries. Children 37 weeks postconception to 18 years old with lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome due to direct lung injury were randomized to receive up to three doses of 30 mg/cm height of surfactant (calfactant) versus placebo (air) within 48 hours of intubation and initiation of mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was mortality at 90 days. Ventilator-free days, changes in oxygenation, and adverse events were also assessed. The study was stopped at the sponsor's request after the second interim analysis for presumed futility. A total of 110 subjects were enrolled, with consent withdrawn from one whose data are unavailable. There were no significant differences between groups except in hospital-free days (10.4 ± 7.8 placebo vs 6.4 ± 7.8 surfactant; p = 0.01). Overall 90-day mortality was 11% (seven surfactant, five placebo). No immediate improvement in oxygenation was associated with surfactant administration. Surfactant did not improve outcomes relative to placebo in this trial of children with direct lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Differences in concentration of the surfactant, failure to recruit the lung during surfactant administration, or using two rather than four position changes during administration are possible explanations for the difference from previous studies. Exogenous surfactant cannot be recommended at this time for children with direct lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.
    Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 07/2013; 14(7). DOI:10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182917b68 · 2.33 Impact Factor