What Is Nursing Home Quality and How Is It Measured?

Department of Health Policy & Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.
The Gerontologist (Impact Factor: 2.48). 08/2010; 50(4):426-42. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnq052
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this commentary, we examine nursing home quality and indicators that have been used to measure nursing home quality.
A brief review of the history of nursing home quality is presented that provides some context and insight into currently used quality indicators. Donabedian's structure, process, and outcome (SPO) model is used to frame the discussion. Current quality indicators and quality initiatives are discussed, including those included in the Facility Quality Indicator Profile Report, Nursing Home Compare, deficiency citations included as part of Medicare/Medicaid certification, and the Advancing Excellence Campaign.
Current quality indicators are presented as a mix of structural, process, and outcome measures, each of which has noted advantages and disadvantages. We speculate on steps that need to be taken in the future to address and potentially improve the quality of care provided by nursing homes, including report cards, pay for performance, market-based incentives, and policy developments in the certification process. Areas for future research are identified throughout the review.
We conclude that improvements in nursing home quality have likely occurred, but improvements are still needed.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The resident assessment instrument (RAI) as a standardized assessment has become established as the gold standard in homes for the elderly and resident nursing homes in Switzerland. The RAI is an important tool with respect to the clarification of needs in long-term outpatient and inpatient nursing care in compliance with the requirements of the Health Insurance Act. The information collated in the initial assessment, the minimum data set (MDS), can be reliably utilized for the nursing process and measurement of quality.The key to success in long-term inpatient nursing can be attributed to the generalized financial solution of resource utilization groups (RUG), which is generated directly from the assessment. Due to standardized training and documentation and in the inpatient area, a uniform electronic data processing solution, a vast amount of data from the last 15 years of experience are available also for scientific use.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between nurse staffing levels and care quality in rural nursing homes, and to assess potential differences between hospital-based and freestanding rural nursing homes. Key Findings: Hospital-owned nursing homes in rural areas have higher nursing staffing levels than freestanding nursing homes. From 2006 to 2011, most quality of care measures for long-stay residents improved in both rural hospital-based and freestanding nursing homes. Higher registered nurse (RN) shares of nurse staffing [the ratio of RN FTEs divided by all RN FTEs and licensed practical nurse (LPN) FTEs were associated with better quality in both rural hospital-based and freestanding nursing homes. On average, a rural facility had to have at least one RN FTE per four total nurse FTEs to significantly improve the composite quality measure for long-stay residents.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improving quality of nursing homes (NHs) is a major social priority, yet few studies examine the role of facility characteristics for residents' quality of life (QOL). This study goes beyond cross-sectional analyses by examining the predictors of NH residents' QOL on the facility level over time. We used three data sources, namely resident interviews using a multidimensional measure of QOL collected in all Medicaid-certified NHs in Minnesota (N = 369), resident clinical data from the minimum data set, and facility-level characteristics. We examined change in six QOL domains from 2007 to 2010, using random coefficient models. Eighty-one facilities improved across most domains and 85 facilities declined. Size, staffing levels (especially activities staff), and resident case mix are some of the most salient predictors of QOL over time, but predictors differ by facility performance status. Understanding the predictors of facility QOL over time can help identify facility characteristics most appropriate for targeting with policy and programmatic interventions. © The Author(s) 2014.
    Research on Aging 08/2014; DOI:10.1177/0164027514545975 · 1.23 Impact Factor


Available from