Projected increased growth rate of anesthesia professional-delivered sedation for colonoscopy and EGD in the United States: 2009 to 2015
ABSTRACT Anesthesia professional-delivered sedation has become increasingly common when performing colonoscopy and EGD.
To provide an estimate of anesthesia professional-participation rates in colonoscopy and EGD procedures and to examine rate changes over time and geographic variations for both procedures.
Retrospective sample design.
National survey data from i3 Innovus for the period 2003 to 2007 on the use rate of anesthesia professionals in both procedures.
A sample of 3688 observations included 3-digit zip code-level information on anesthesia professional use rates.
Data were linked to the Bureau of Health Professions' Area Resource File to control for sociodemographic factors and provider supply characteristics for anesthesia professional use rates.
Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify factors predicting the use rate of anesthesia professionals in these procedures and to forecast use rates for the years 2009 to 2015.
For colonoscopy and EGD, anesthesia professional participation is projected to grow from 23.9% and 24.4% in 2007 to 53.4% and 52.9% by 2015, respectively. Average growth rates were highest in the northeast for colonoscopy (145.8%) and EGD (146.6%). Anesthesia professional use rates were significantly greater in areas having a higher percentage of older subjects (45 years and older), higher per capita income and lower unemployment rates, and higher per capita inpatient admissions and were significantly lower in areas having more per capita outpatient visits for both procedures.
Nonexperimental retrospective sample study design. Database sample may not be nationally representative. Market area characteristics were used to control for socioeconomic and demographic factors. However, there may remain some important market factors that we were unable to control.
Anesthesia professional-delivered sedation is projected to grow substantially for both procedures.
- SourceAvailable from: Shin Haeng Lee
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "Liu 55 showed that the proportion of sedated endoscopic procedures 56 has more than doubled, from approximately 14% in 2003 to 30% 57 in 2009 (Liu et al., 2012). In another study, the percentage of 58 sedated endoscopy was expected to increase by 53% in 2015 59 (Inadomi et al., 2010). 60 Generally, periodic surveillance endoscopy is recommended for 61 various conditions and risk factors, varying from every 3 months to 62 every 2–3 years (Hirota et al., 2006). "
ABSTRACT: As the sedative use increases due to the effectiveness and relatively safe profile, the abuse potential is also increasing. This study was conducted to examine the usage of four sedative agents in endoscopic examination and to compare the propofol use with the other three sedatives. Using National Health Insurance claims data from 2008 to 2012, we identified the number of cases of conscious sedation during endoscopy using one or more of the following agents: propofol, midazolam, diazepam, and lorazepam. The general characteristics of patients and medical service providers were analyzed, and the regional and annual distributions of frequency of use were compared. We also identified patient cases with excessive number of endoscopic examinations. Among the total of 3,156,231 sedatives users, midazolam was the most commonly used agent (n=2,845,250, 90.1%). However, the largest increase in patient number, which increased from 11,410 in 2008 to 28,170 in 2012, was observed with propofol. While the majority of patients received an annual endoscopy, we identified several suspected abuse cases of patients receiving endoscopies repetitively as many as 114 times in five years. The rise of sedative use in endoscopic examinations and several patient cases of repeated sedative administration suggest a potential risk for abuse. Medical service providers should be cautious when using sedatives and carefully review each patient's medical history prior to the procedure. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 02/2015; 42(3). DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.01.007 · 2.14 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: An in-node fast optimal packet routing algorithm in Manhattan street network using cellular neural network (CNN) is described. The proposed algorithm generates not only the possible transition matrix (governing the switching in the node) but also the optimal transition matrix, taking into account the traffic density in the vicinity of the node and the sum of packet priorities. In this way, the overall throughput rate was improved, compared to the shortest path algorithm. This result is proved by computer simulations. The inherent CNN's feature of parallel analog processing permits on-line processing without any additional control logic circuitryElectrotechnical Conference, 1998. MELECON 98., 9th Mediterranean; 06/1998
Conference Paper: Optical differential 16-ary Jones-vector shift keying[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The transceiver design of differential 16-ary Jones-vector-shift-keying (D16JSK) using multilevel detection is presented. The sensitivity of D16JSK is compared to that of polarization-division-multiplexed DQPSK. The transmission performance of D16JSK is studied by simulation.Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, 2005. QELS '05; 06/2005