The spectrum of adjustment disorders: too broad to be clinically helpful.

Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
CNS spectrums (Impact Factor: 1.3). 06/2010; 15(6):382-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The clinical value of the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders diagnosis of adjustment disorder is controversial. The aim of this article is to review the literature on adjustment disorder and to present suggestions for the improvement of this diagnostic category in future classification systems. The literature utilized for this review was retrieved by MEDLINE (1967 until May 2009) and was supplemented by a manual search of the literature. The analysis of the literature indicates that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder is not characterized by consistent clinical description and prognosis, adequate differentiation from other disorders, or specific psychometric and neurobiologic features. The spectrum of affective disturbances entailed by the diagnosis of adjustment disorder appears to be too broad. A major problem seems to lie in the fact that it is an exclusion diagnosis that overlaps with subthreshold manifestations of mood and anxiety disorders. More precise characterizations of stress-related disturbances are available.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of comorbid mental disorders as well as the extent of psychosocial distress in patients with intracranial tumours and their partners during the early treatment phase. Moreover, we aimed to identify which events are experienced as most distressing in the context of the early diagnosis of brain cancer by patients and spouses. Structured clinical interviews for DSM-IV (SCID-IV) were conducted with 26 patients and their partners after the first neurosurgical treatment within the first 3 months after the detection of a brain tumour. Screening measures (NCCN distress thermometer, HADS, IES-R) were used to assess the extent of psychosocial distress as well as anxiety, depression and traumatic stress responses. Distressing experiences were assessed via a structured questionnaire and interview. Thirty-eight per cent of the patients and 47% of the partners suffered from a psychiatric disorder. Most frequent diagnoses were adjustment disorder and acute stress disorder. The majority of the participants suffered from elevated psychosocial distress. Partners were equally or even more affected than the patients. For the patients, the experience most frequently described as distressing was the first detection of the tumour. The majority of the partners reported to be distressed by the fear of surgery outcomes. This study revealed that during this very first treatment phase, both brain tumour patients and their spouses show a high prevalence of comorbid mental disorders and psychosocial distress. The findings suggest that research and clinical efforts are needed to address the psychosocial concerns of these populations.
    Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2010; 19(11):1797-805. DOI:10.1007/s00520-010-1021-8 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is increasing awareness of the need of subtyping major depressive disorder, particularly in the setting of medical disease. The aim of this investigation was to use both DSM-IV comorbidity and the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) for characterizing depression in the medically ill. 1700 patients were recruited from 8 medical centers in the Italian Health System and 1560 agreed to participate. They all underwent a cross-sectional assessment with DSM-IV and DCPR structured interviews. 198 patients (12.7%) received a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Data were submitted to cluster analysis. Two clusters were identified: depressed somatizers and irritable/anxious depression. The somatizer cluster included 58.6% of the cases and was characterized by DCPR somatization syndromes (persistent somatization, functional somatic symptoms secondary to a psychiatric disorder, conversion symptoms, and anniversary reactions) and DCPR alexithymia. The anxious/irritable cluster had 41.4% of the total sample and included DCPR irritable mood and type A behavior and DSM-IV anxiety disorders. The study has limitations due to its cross-sectional nature. Further, these findings require additional validation in another sample. The findings indicate the need of expanding clinical assessment in the medically ill to include the various manifestations of somatization, irritable mood, type A behavior and alexithymia, as encompassed by the DCPR. Subtyping major depressive disorder may yield improved targets for psychosomatic research and treatment trials.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 03/2011; 132(3):383-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.004 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This literature review summarizes the current research on nonpharmacological management of depressive symptoms for patients nearing the end of their lives. Research suggests that major depressive disorder may affect terminally ill adults at a disproportionately high rate. Psychotherapy has not been shown to have consistent benefits among patients in the final months of life. Semi-psychotherapeutic (life review) techniques are likely most effective in patients in the final weeks of life. Non-psychotherapeutic techniques such as hypnotherapy have not been studied sufficiently to be recommended as first-line treatments. Based on the current research, it is our recommendation that psychotherapy be used first-line in patients with approximately 6 months or more to live, and that semi-psychotherapeutic techniques be first-line in patients with 6 months or less to live.
    The American journal of hospice & palliative care 07/2011; 29(3):183-94. DOI:10.1177/1049909111413889 · 1.35 Impact Factor