Article

A binocular approach to treating amblyopia: antisuppression therapy.

McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry (Impact Factor: 1.53). 09/2010; 87(9):697-704. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ea18e9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We developed a binocular treatment for amblyopia based on antisuppression therapy.
A novel procedure is outlined for measuring the extent to which the fixing eye suppresses the fellow amblyopic eye. We hypothesize that suppression renders a structurally binocular system, functionally monocular.
We demonstrate using three strabismic amblyopes that information can be combined normally between their eyes under viewing conditions where suppression is reduced. Also, we show that prolonged periods of viewing (under the artificial conditions of stimuli of different contrast in each eye) during which information from the two eyes is combined leads to a strengthening of binocular vision in such cases and eventual combination of binocular information under natural viewing conditions (stimuli of the same contrast in each eye). Concomitant improvement in monocular acuity of the amblyopic eye occurs with this reduction in suppression and strengthening of binocular fusion. Furthermore, in each of the three cases, stereoscopic function is established.
This provides the basis for a new treatment of amblyopia, one that is purely binocular and aimed at reducing suppression as a first step.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
117 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The amblyopic visual system was once considered to be structurally monocular. However, it now evident that the capacity for binocular vision is present in many observers with amblyopia. This has led to new techniques for quantifying suppression that have provided insights into the relationship between suppression and the monocular and binocular visual deficits experienced by amblyopes. Furthermore, new treatments are emerging that directly target suppressive interactions within the visual cortex and, on the basis of initial data, appear to improve both binocular and monocular visual function, even in adults with amblyopia. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of recent studies that have investigated the structure, measurement and treatment of binocular vision in observers with strabismic, anisometropic and mixed amblyopia.
    Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 03/2014; 34(2):146-62. · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To better understand the relationship between dichoptic masking in normal vision and suppression in amblyopia we address three questions; first, what is the time course of dichoptic masking in normals and amblyopes? Second, is interocular suppression low-pass or band-pass in its spatial dependence? And thirdly, in the above two regards, is dichoptic masking in normals different from amblyopic suppression? Methods: We measured the dependence of dichoptic masking in normal controls and amblyopes on the temporal duration of presentation under three conditions; monocular (the non-tested eye, i.e., dominant eye of normals or non-amblyopic eye of amblyopes, being patched), dichoptic-luminance (the non-tested eye seeing a mean luminance i.e., a DC component) and dichoptic-contrast (the non-tested eye seeing high contrast visual noise). The subject had to detect a letter in the other eye, the contrast of which was varied. Results: We found that threshold elevation relative to the patched condition occurred in both normals and amblyopes when the non-tested eye saw either 1/f or band-pass filtered noise, but not just mean luminance (i.e., there was no masking from the DC component that corresponds to a channel responsive to a spatial frequency of 0 cycles/°); longer presentation of the target (corresponding to lower temporal frequencies) produced greater threshold elevation. Conclusions: Dichoptic masking exhibits similar properties in both subject groups, being low-pass temporally and band-pass spatially, so that masking was greatest at the longest presentation durations and was not greatly affected by mean luminance in the non-tested eye.
    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 04/2014; · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment. Patching, which is modestly effective, is the current treatment of amblyopia in children. There is no clinically approved treatment for adults. The present study is a clinical trial (non-sham controlled and non-randomized) that assessed the efficacy of binocular training for improvement of the visual acuity in children and adults with amblyopia. Twenty-two amblyopic subjects ranging in age from 5 to 73 (mean: 36.2) years for whom patching and/or surgical treatments did not correct their visual impairment completed an average of 14.5 sessions of binocular training over a period of 4 to 6 weeks. Random dot kinematograms were presented dichoptically to the two eyes and the participants' task was to identify the direction of motion of the targets. Mean visual acuity improvement was 0.34 LogMAR (range: 0.1-0.58 LogMAR) and was shown to persist 6 months following the cessation of binocular training. Our study provides results in a large number of patients that confirm the clinical effectiveness of binocular training as a treatment for amblyopia in improving visual acuity in both children and adults. Moreover, this study is the first to demonstrate that the improvements in visual function were maintained for 6 months in the absence of any additional treatment.
    Strabismus 03/2014; 22(1):1-6.