A binocular approach to treating amblyopia: antisuppression therapy.

McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry (Impact Factor: 2.04). 09/2010; 87(9):697-704. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ea18e9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We developed a binocular treatment for amblyopia based on antisuppression therapy.
A novel procedure is outlined for measuring the extent to which the fixing eye suppresses the fellow amblyopic eye. We hypothesize that suppression renders a structurally binocular system, functionally monocular.
We demonstrate using three strabismic amblyopes that information can be combined normally between their eyes under viewing conditions where suppression is reduced. Also, we show that prolonged periods of viewing (under the artificial conditions of stimuli of different contrast in each eye) during which information from the two eyes is combined leads to a strengthening of binocular vision in such cases and eventual combination of binocular information under natural viewing conditions (stimuli of the same contrast in each eye). Concomitant improvement in monocular acuity of the amblyopic eye occurs with this reduction in suppression and strengthening of binocular fusion. Furthermore, in each of the three cases, stereoscopic function is established.
This provides the basis for a new treatment of amblyopia, one that is purely binocular and aimed at reducing suppression as a first step.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Short daily periods of binocular vision, if concordant and continuous, have been shown to outweigh or protect against much longer daily periods of monocular deprivation to allow the development of normal visual acuity in both eyes of kittens. The greater weight placed on binocular visual input could arise because of an inherent bias for binocular input within the visual pathway at all times during development (Binocular model), or else from a more passive process that follows from its match to a highly binocular template at the time mixed daily visual input began (Template model). To distinguish between the predictions of these two models, kittens were monocularly deprived from normal eye-opening until either 4, 5, or 6 weeks of age at which time they received mixed daily visual input for 4 weeks. According to the Template model, the preferred input for these animals would be monocular exposure (ME) because of its match to the monocular template produced by a period of preceding monocular deprivation. However, instead of short daily period of ME offsetting much longer periods of binocular exposure (BE) to perpetuate the dire effects of the prior deprivation, short daily periods of BE promoted significant recovery of vision in the deprived eye. The fit to the Binocular model implies the existence of a robust substrate for binocular vision that is highly resistant to disruption and which could form the substrate for binocular approaches to treatment of amblyopia.
    Vision research 06/2011; 51(12):1351-9. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.011 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the past 20 years, there has been a great advancement in knowledge pertaining to compliance with amblyopia treatments. The occlusion dose monitor introduced quantitative monitoring methods in patching, which sparked our initial understanding of the dose-response relationship for patching amblyopia treatment. This review focuses on current compliance knowledge and the impact it has on patching and atropine amblyopia treatment. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Vision Research 03/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.012 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of Vision 08/2014; 14(10):959-959. DOI:10.1167/14.10.959 · 2.73 Impact Factor