A complete course of intravenous antibiotics vs a combination of intravenous and oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective, randomized trial

Department of Surgery, The Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.31). 06/2010; 45(6):1198-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.090
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a previous prospective randomized trial, we found a once-a-day regimen of ceftriaxone and metronidazole to be an efficient, cost-effective treatment for children with perforated appendicitis. In this study, we evaluated the safety of discharging patients to complete an oral course of antibiotics.
Children found to have perforated appendicitis at the time of laparoscopic appendectomy were enrolled in the study. Perforation was defined as a hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen. Patients were randomized to antibiotic treatment with either once daily dosing of ceftriaxone and metronidazole for a minimum of 5 days (intravenous [IV] arm) or discharge to home on oral amoxicillin/clavulanate when tolerating a regular diet (IV/PO arm) to complete 7 days.
One hundred two patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. On presentation, there were no differences in age, weight, sex distribution, days of symptoms, maximum temperature, or leukocyte count between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the postoperative abscess rate between the two treatment groups. Discharge was possible before day 5 in 42% of the patients in the IV/PO arm.
When patients are able to tolerate a regular diet, completing the course of antibiotics orally decreases hospitalization with no effect on the risk of postoperative abscess formation.


Available from: Susan W Sharp, Apr 19, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Ruptured appendicitis has been implicated in causing scarring which can lead to infertility and/or ectopic pregnancy. Objective To assess the degree of association and the quality of evidence supporting the relation between appendectomy, female fertility outcomes, and ectopic pregnancy. Design and methods: We systematically searched multiple electronic databases from inception through May 2013 for randomized trials and observational studies. Reviewers working in duplicate and independently extracted study characteristics, the quality of the included studies and the outcomes of interest. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool the odds risks (OR) from the included studies. Result Our meta-analysis based on seven observational studies provided evidence that previous appendectomy is not associated with increased incidence of infertility in women (OR = 1.03, 0.86 – 1.24, p = 0.71). This finding was further augmented by several non-comparative cohorts that discussed the same issue and reported nearly the same conclusion; however these studies pointed towards putative negative impact of surgery for complicated appendicitis on fertility. Our second meta-analysis revealed the effect of appendectomy on ectopic pregnancy was found to be significant based on a pooled estimate from 4 studies (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.46 – 2.16, p < 0.0001). Conclusion Appendectomy is significantly associated with increased risk of ectopic pregnancy but not significantly associated with future infertility in women.
    Journal of Surgical Research 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.017 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of laparoscopy has been established in improving perioperative and postoperative outcomes for patients with simple appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with less wound pain, less wound infection, a shorter hospital stay, and faster overall recovery when compared to the open appendectomy for uncomplicated cases. In the past two decades, the use of laparoscopy for the treatment of perforated appendicitis to take the advantages of minimally invasiveness has increased. This article reviewed the prevalence, approaches, safety disclaimers, perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of patients with perforated appendicitis. Special issues including the conversion, interval appendectomy, laparoscopic approach for elderly or obese patient are also discussed to define the role of laparoscopic treatment for patients with perforated appendicitis.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 10/2014; 20(39):14338-14347. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14338 · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the effectiveness of a postoperative ruptured appendicitis protocol that eliminated Pseudomonas coverage and based the duration of IV antibiotic treatment and length of hospital stay on the patient’s clinical response.Methods In our new protocol, IV antibiotics were administered until the patient met discharge criteria: adequate oral intake, pain control with oral medications, and afebrile for 24 h. We collected data on all patients with ruptured appendicitis at our institution following protocol implementation (May 1, 2012, to April 30, 2013) and compared them to a control group.Results306 patients were treated (154 prior protocol, 152 new protocol). The new clinical response-based protocol led to a decrease in hospital stay from 134 h (SD 66.1) to 94.5 h (SD 61.7) (p < 0.001) and total cost of care per patient also decreased from $13,610 (SD $6859) to $9870 (SD $5670) (p < 0.001).Conclusion Our clinical response-based protocol for pediatric patients with ruptured appendicitis decreased LOS, cost, and IV antibiotics use without significant changes in adverse events.
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 11/2014; 49(12). DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.012 · 1.31 Impact Factor