Article

Evaluation of a differential mobility spectrometer/miniature mass spectrometer system.

Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1393, USA.
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (Impact Factor: 3.59). 09/2010; 21(9):1477-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.06.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A planar differential mobility spectrometer (DMS) was coupled to a Mini 10 handheld rectilinear ion trap (RIT) mass spectrometer (MS) (total weight 10 kg), and the performance of the instrument was evaluated using illicit drug analysis. Coupling of DMS (which requires a continuous flow of drift gas) with a miniature MS (which operates best using sample introduction via a discontinuous atmospheric pressure interface, DAPI), was achieved with auxiliary pumping using a 5 L/min miniature diaphragm sample pump placed between the two devices. On-line ion mobility filtering showed to be advantageous in reducing the background chemical noise in the analysis of the psychotropic drug diazepam in urine using nanoelectrospray ionization. The combination of a miniature mass spectrometer with simple and rapid gas-phase ion separation by DMS allowed the characteristic fragmentation pattern of diazepam to be distinguished in a simple urine extract at lower limits of detection (50 ng/mL) than that achieved without DMS (200 ng/mL). The additional separation power of DMS facilitated the identification of two drugs of similar molecular weight, morphine (average MW = 285.34) and diazepam (average MW = 284.70), using a miniature mass spectrometer capable of unit resolution. The similarity in the proton affinities of these two compounds resulted in some cross-interference in the MS data due to facile ionization of the neutral form of the compound even when the ionic form had been separated by DMS.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
74 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Trends in analytical atomic and molecular mass spectrometry (MS) are reviewed here with an emphasis on problems related to biology and the life sciences. The move towards novel desorption/ionization techniques including matrix-free laser desorption-ionization MS and recent technological developments in MS imaging of elements, small molecules, and proteins are discussed. Recent developments in the interfacing of microfluidics with MS are also reviewed. Metabolic profiling, evaluation of biomarkers, pharmaceutical metabolite identification, and many related topics are addressed.
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 03/2011; 399(8):2585-95. · 3.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electrospray ionization (ESI) is an important tool in chemical and biochemical survey and targeted analysis in many applications. For chemical detection and identification electrospray is usually used with mass spectrometry (MS). However, for screening and monitoring of chemicals of interest in light, low power field-deployable instrumentation, an alternative detection technology with chemical selectivity would be highly useful, especially since small, lightweight, chip-based gas and liquid chromatographic technologies are being developed. Our initial list of applications requiring portable instruments includes chemical surveys on Mars, medical diagnostics based on metabolites in biological samples, and water quality analysis. In this report, we evaluate ESI-Differential Mobility Spectrometry (DMS) as a compact, low-power alternative to MS detection. Use of DMS for chemically-selective detection of ESI suffers in comparison with mass spectrometry because portable MS peak capacity is greater than that of DMS by 10X or more, but the development of light, fast chip chromatography offers compensating resolution. Standalone DMS provides the chemical selectivity familiar from DMS-MS publications, and exploits the sensitivity of ion detection. We find that sub-microliter-per-minute flows and a correctly-designed interface prepare a desolvated ion stream that enables DMS to act as an effective ion filter. Results for a several small organic biomarkers and metabolites, including citric acid, azelaic acid, n-hexanoylglycine, thymidine, and caffeine, as well as compounds such as dinitrotoluene and others, have been characterized and demonstrate selective detection. Water-quality-related halogen-containing anions, fluoride through bromate, contained in liquid samples are also isolated by DMS. A reaction-chamber interface is highlighted as most practical for portable ESI-DMS instrumentation.
    International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry 09/2013; 16(3):217-227.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The general principles and the technical implementations of traditional time-of-flight ion mobility spectrometers and analyzers with field dependent mobilities were reviewed in our last article in this journal. Recent advances in instrumentation and new applications since 2006 are highlighted in this review. In addition to traditional applications as military chemical-agent detector, ion mobility techniques became more and more popular for different purposes. While ion mobility spectrometry was solely used as vapor sensor in the past decades, further developments in ionization techniques (especially electrospray ionization) permit now the routine use for the analysis of liquid samples. The coupling of ion mobility spectrometry with selective sample preparation techniques such as molecular imprinted polymers, the coupling with chromatographic techniques, the use of dopants and the application of selective ionization sources led to an expanded number of applications in industrial and environmental analysis with complex sample matrices due to an improved selectivity in comparison with traditional stand-alone spectrometers. Furthermore, new developments in hyphenated techniques, especially ion mobility—mass spectrometry couplings, resulted in an increased number of new applications for the analysis of biomolecules, pharmaceutical samples and in clinical diagnostics.
    Applied Spectroscopy Reviews 01/2011; 46:472-521. · 2.92 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
19 Downloads
Available from
Jun 2, 2014