Editorial: Current Issues and New Directions in Psychology and Health. The Role of the Critic in Health Psychology: The Healthy Scepticism Project

Psychology & Health (Impact Factor: 1.95). 07/2010; 25(6):647-50. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2010.498227
Source: PubMed
3 Reads
    • "Whilst the happiness-based interventions with which these authors take issue are frequently promoted on the basis of scientific evidence, as the next section illustrates , these claims are often more rhetorical than real. Indeed, Coyne et al. (2010:39) allege the relationship between optimism and health and mortality has 'taken on ideological importance ,' referring to positive psychology's significance to cancer care as a 'story line resistant to evidence.' Much literature has traced the rise of happiness in history and philosophy (Bruckner 2010; Kenny and Kenny 2006; McMahon 2006; White 2005), academic thought (Angner 2005, 2011; Bruni 2006, Linley et al. 2007), social indicators and social policy (Andrews 1989; Ben-Arieh 2008; Lippman 2007; Noll 2004; Tomlinson and Kelly 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the short decades since the introduction of positive psychology instigated broader interdisciplinary research, interest in happiness has been growing in academia, the media and public policy. Numerous critiques of these developments have been forwarded from a variety of theoretical and disciplinary traditions. This article discusses three such criticisms: the culture-bound and normative character of happiness, ‘bad science’ and scientism, and diminished subjectivity and individualisation. It is argued that criticism, particularly internal criticism, evidences the maturity of the field. However, the depth of some critiques may also indicate that interest in happiness is bound with broader cultural preoccupations and is likely to be superseded.
    Sociology Compass 01/2015; 9(1). DOI:10.1111/soc4.12236
  • Health Psychology Review 03/2011; 5(1-1):39-47. DOI:10.1080/17437199.2010.520114 · 2.06 Impact Factor