Prevalence of DSM-IV Disorder in a Representative, Healthy Birth Cohort at School Entry: Sociodemographic Risks and Social Adaptation

University of Massachusetts Boston, Department of Psychology, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.26). 07/2010; 49(7):686-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.03.018
Source: PubMed


The aims of this paper are as follows: to present past-year prevalence data for DSM-IV disorders in the early elementary school years; to examine the impact of impairment criteria on prevalence estimates; to examine the relation of sociodemographic and psychosocial risk factors to disorders; and to explore associations between "internalizing" and "externalizing" disorders and social competence and family burden as further validation of the impairing nature of these disorders.
As part of a longitudinal representative population study of children born healthy between July 1995 and September 1997 in the New Haven-Meriden Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area of the 1990 Census (n = 1,329), parents of a subsample enriched for child psychopathology (n = 442; 77.6% response rate, 69.5% of eligible sample) were interviewed in the child's kindergarten or first-grade year with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV (DISC-IV). Parents were surveyed about sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics, and both parents and teachers were surveyed about social competence.
Approximately one in five (21.6 %) children met criteria for psychiatric disorder(s) with impairment. Sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates included persistent poverty beginning in early childhood, limited parental education, low family expressiveness, stressful life events, and violence exposure. Finally, diagnostic status was significantly associated with poorer social competence and family burden.
That approximately one in five children evidenced a psychiatric disorder with impairment during the transition to formal schooling highlights the importance of integrating psychiatric epidemiological and developmental approaches to inform conversations about school readiness and intervention planning.

Download full-text


Available from: Alice S Carter,
    • "Sampling weights were applied to adjust for selection and retention biases. Study details are reported elsewhere (Briggs-Gowan, Carter , Skuban, & Horwitz, 2001; Carter et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The accuracy of any screening instrument designed to detect psychopathology among children is ideally assessed through rigorous comparison to 'gold standard' tests and interviews. Such comparisons typically yield estimates of what we refer to as 'standard indices of diagnostic accuracy', including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value. However, whereas these statistics were originally designed to detect binary signals (e.g., diagnosis present or absent), screening questionnaires commonly used in psychology, psychiatry, and pediatrics typically result in ordinal scores. Thus, a threshold or 'cut score' must be applied to these ordinal scores before accuracy can be evaluated using such standard indices. To better understand the tradeoffs inherent in choosing a particular threshold, we discuss the concept of 'threshold probability'. In contrast to PPV, which reflects the probability that a child whose score falls at or above the screening threshold has the condition of interest, threshold probability refers specifically to the likelihood that a child whose score is equal to a particular screening threshold has the condition of interest. The diagnostic accuracy and threshold probability of two well-validated behavioral assessment instruments, the Child Behavior Checklist Total Problem Scale and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire total scale were examined in relation to a structured psychiatric interview in three de-identified datasets. Although both screening measures were effective in identifying groups of children at elevated risk for psychopathology in all samples (odds ratios ranged from 5.2 to 9.7), children who scored at or near the clinical thresholds that optimized sensitivity and specificity were unlikely to meet criteria for psychopathology on gold standard interviews. Our results are consistent with the view that screening instruments should be interpreted probabilistically, with attention to where along the continuum of positive scores an individual falls. © 2015 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 06/2015; 56(9). DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12442 · 6.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Due to the prevalence of anxiety and depression (among other problems and psychiatric disorders ) in school settings and their frequent co-occurrence (Carter et al., 2010), researchers over the past several decades have been seeking to understand the relationship between anxiety and depression with the ultimate goal of improving our approach to treatment (Merrell, 2008; Roeser et al., 1998). If we identify common underlying risk factors for anxiety and depressive disorders, we may be better able to design treatments that target these risk factors to prevent and alleviate these internalizing problems in children (Adelman & Taylor, 1998). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identifying mechanisms that explain the relationship between anxiety and depression are needed. The Tripartite Model is one model that has been proposed to help explain the association between these two problems, positing a shared component called negative affect. The objective of the present study was to examine the role of loneliness in relation to anxiety and depression. A total of 10,891 school-based youth (Grades 2–12) and 254 clinical children and adolescents receiving residential treatment (Grades 2–12) completed measures of loneliness, anxiety, depression, and negative affect. The relationships among loneliness, anxiety, depression, and negative affect were examined, including whether loneliness was a significant intervening variable. Various mediational tests converged showing that loneliness was a significant mediator in the relationship between anxiety and depression. This effect was found across children (Grades 2–6) and adolescent (Grades 7–12) school-based youth. In the clinical sample, loneliness was found to be a significant mediator between anxiety and depression, even after introducing negative affect based on the Tripartite Model. Results supported loneliness as a significant risk factor in youths' lives that may result from anxiety and place youth at risk for subsequent depression. Implications related to intervention and prevention in school settings are also discussed.
    Psychology in the Schools 03/2015; 52(3). DOI:10.1002/pits.21818 · 0.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "As coaching models become more prevalent, the assessment of integrity for both the teacher and coach in tiered models of support may help increase our understanding of whether models are being implemented with high quality, therefore increasing the effectiveness of tiered models of support. As the number of young children with chronic problem behavior in early childhood settings continues to rise (Brauner & Stephens, 2006; Carter et al., 2010; McCabe & Frede, 2007), so too does the need for feasible and sustainable evidence-based programs to be implemented by teachers in authentic early childhood settings (Domitrovich , Gest, Jones, Gill, & DeRousie, 2010). Results from this investigation support the assertion by Joyce and Showers (2002) that, when used in combination with other professional development activities, coaching can enhance the use of practices by teachers. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to describe the practice-based coaching model used in BEST in CLASS, a Tier-2 classroom-based intervention comprised of evi-dence-based instructional practices designed to prevent and ameliorate the chronic problem behaviors of young chil-dren at risk for the development of emotional/behavioral disorders. Following a description of the model, data from year two of an ongoing 4-year randomized control trial are presented that describe (a) the amount (i.e., dosage) of coaching teachers received during BEST in CLASS implementation, (b) the integrity with which coaches implemented the BEST in CLASS coaching model, and (c) subsequent teacher implementation of the BEST in CLASS strategies. Forty-eight (23 BEST in CLASS; 25 comparison) teachers and ten coaches participated in this descriptive study. Data indicate that following coaches' observations, teachers received approximately 30 min of practice-based coaching during coaching meetings each week of implementation, and integrity data indicate that coaches implemented the critical coaching skills during the coaching meetings with integrity. Adherence data indicate that teachers in the treatment group increased their exten-siveness of the use of BEST in CLASS practices at both post-treatment and 1-month follow-up compared to com-parison teachers; competence data indicated that teachers in the treatment group increased the quality of delivery of practices at post-treatment compared to comparison teachers. Implications of these findings for both future research and practice-based coaching implementation are discussed.
    School Mental Health 10/2014; 7(1). DOI:10.1007/s12310-014-9134-8
Show more