A translational and systemic approach to transferring liver transplant recipients from pediatric to adult-oriented care settings

Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.
Pediatric Transplantation (Impact Factor: 1.44). 11/2010; 14(7):823-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01348.x
Source: PubMed


Annunziato RA, Hogan B, Barton C, Miloh T, Arnon R, Iyer K, Kerkar N. A translational and systemic approach to transferring liver transplant recipients from pediatric to adult-oriented care settings. Pediatr Transplantation 2010: 14:823–829. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Abstract: The purpose of this review is to (i) describe systemic changes made in our clinical practice to facilitate transfer of transplant recipients from the pediatric to the adult service and (ii) provide the rationale for instituting these organizational changes. To determine specific areas patients struggle to master, a survey assessing behaviors indicative of health care management was administered in pediatrics. Based on the results of the survey, all liver transplant recipients who transfer out of pediatrics are given a comprehensive clinical protocol, which includes a transfer checklist containing prerequisite items derived from our prior work. Patients are furthermore invited to enroll in a research study prospectively tracking both medical and psychosocial outcomes at six-month intervals. Data are discussed by the pediatric and adult teams, and additional adjustments to the transfer process are implemented in response. A summary of our clinical interventions and the resources required for implementation are presented. In conclusion, preliminary studies have demonstrated that transplant recipients are vulnerable to disruptions in health care management when they transfer out of pediatrics. This study describes one site’s translational efforts to improve the transfer process for both the recipients and the clinicians, thus improving outcomes.

0 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The need to prepare pediatric transplant recipients for the transfer to adult-centered transplant care has received increased attention. This study aimed to determine adolescent and young adult LTR and parent perceptions and attitudes about the transition process. LTR and their parents completed a survey assessing level of prior thought and interest in learning about transferring care, knowledge of the transition process, perceived importance of self-management skills, concerns about moving to the adult clinic, and responsibility for health management tasks. Responses were analyzed by age, gender, and time since transplantation. Participants included 46 LTR (mean age = 16.6 yr; range 12-21), and 31 parents. Recipients and parents reported moderate concern about transition, with leaving pediatric providers being a primary worry. LTR ≥16 yr reported greater health care responsibility and increased thought, interest, and knowledge about transition. There were significant differences between parent and LTR perceptions of health care responsibility, indicating that LTR perceive having more independence than what their parents report. Overall, results suggest that adolescent and young adult LTR and their parents perceive the importance of transitional care, but demonstrate poor knowledge of the process. There remains a need for improved transition planning for both adolescents and parents.
    Pediatric Transplantation 06/2011; 15(4):414-24. DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01499.x · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Qualitative studies remain relatively uncommon in the transplant literature but are an important approach contributing unique strengths in some areas of research. With the increased focus on patient-centered research and decision-making, it is timely to review qualitative research in the context of transplantation. While quantitative research addresses questions about the effectiveness of interventions or associations between risk factors and outcomes, qualitative research has an equal and complementary role in providing understanding about people's behaviors, attitudes, and values. Qualitative research has provided insights into some of the important but elusive questions in transplantation, including the sources of barriers to organ donation and inequities in access to transplantation, nonadherence to immunosuppressive regimens, and complex psychosocial outcomes. This review highlights recent contributions of qualitative research to transplantation practice and policy, and identifies key principles to guide qualitative research appraisal.
    American Journal of Transplantation 05/2013; 13(6). DOI:10.1111/ajt.12239 · 5.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine the safety, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a cross-age peer mentoring program created to improve adherence and psychosocial outcomes for pediatric liver transplant recipients. Twenty-two participants were assigned to a "mentor now" or "mentor later" waitlist control group. Tacrolimus SD, a validated measure of adherence, was assessed for six months pre- and post-intervention for both groups. Self-report measures of self-management and HRQOL were completed at recruitment and three months after training. Participant report indicated the acceptability of the intervention. Clinically significant improvement in adherence was detected. No significant changes on the psychosocial outcome measures at follow-up were observed. This study demonstrated that an outpatient-based mentoring program is a safe, feasible, and acceptable option to incorporate within a pediatric liver transplant program with potential for promising application in other transplantation populations as well. These results also suggest that the program may have been associated with meaningful improvement in adherence, although further evaluation is warranted.
    Pediatric Transplantation 08/2013; 17(7). DOI:10.1111/petr.12127 · 1.44 Impact Factor
Show more