Article
Inter- and intrafractional positional uncertainties in pediatric radiotherapy patients with brain and head and neck tumors.
Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics (impact factor:
4.59).
03/2011;
79(4):1266-74.
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.057
pp.1266-74
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Geometrical uncertainty margins in 3D conformal radiotherapy in the pediatric age group.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate set-up variation of pediatric patients undergoing 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using electronic portal image device (EPID), in an effort to evaluate the adequacy of the planning target volume (PTV) margin employed for the 3DCRT treatment of pediatric patients. Set-up data was collected from 48 pediatric patients treated with 3DCRTfor head and neck (31 patients), abdomino-pelvic (9 patients) and chest (8 patients) sites during the period between September 2008 and February 2009. A total of 358 images obtained by EPID were analyzed. The mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) for systematic and random errors were calculated and the results were analyzed. All images were studied in anterior and lateral portals. The systematic errors along longitudinal, lateral and vertical directions in all patients showed an M equal to 1.9, 1.6, and 1.6mm with SD of 1.8, 1.4, and 1.8mm, respectively; (head and neck cases: M equal to 1.5, 1.2, and 1.6mm with SD 1.4, 1.2, and 1.8mm; chest cases: M equal to 2.5, 1.8, and 0.8mm with SD 2.7, 1.7, and 1.2mm, abdomino-pelvic cases: M equal to 2.9, 2.8 and 2.3mm with SD 1.6, 1.2, and 2.3mm). Similarly, the random errors for all patients showed SD of 1.9, 1.6, and 1.8mm, respectively (head and neck cases: SD 1.7, 1.3, and 1.5mm; chest cases: SD 1.2, 1.9, and 2.5mm; abdomino-pelvic cases SD 2.5, 2, and 2.4mm, respectively). Using Van Herk's formula the suggested (PTV) margin around the clinical target volume (CTV) of 5.5mm appears to be adequate. The ranges of set-up errors are site specific and depends on many factors.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute 06/2011; 23(2):55-60.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
2-mm threshold
average SU
different imaging frequencies
estimate radiation therapy planning margins
internal review board-approved localization protocol
intrafractional residual uncertainty
median age
Megavoltage cone-beam CT
neck tumor patients
Pediatric patients
planning target volume
posttreatment offsets
pretreatment CBCT
pretreatment offsets
prone position
setup margin
SM component
SU data
treatment position
weekly CBCT