Cardiac cell therapy: Lessons from clinical trials

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Université Paris Descartes, INSERM U 633, Paris, France.
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology (Impact Factor: 5.22). 02/2011; 50(2):258-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.06.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cardiac cell therapy has now been in clinical use since 10 years. Both autologous skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow-derived different cell subsets (mononuclear cells, hematopoietic progenitors, mesenchymal stem cells) have been investigated in different settings (acute myocardial infarction, refractory angina and chronic heart failure). Despite the huge variability in cell processing techniques, dosing, timing of delivery and route for cell transfer, some lessons can yet be drawn, primarily from randomized controlled trials and summarized as follows: Techniques used for cell preparation are reasonably well controlled although better standardization and improvement in scale-up procedures remain necessary; cell therapy is overall safe, with the caveat of ventricular arrhythmias which still require careful scrutinization; the cell type needs to be tailored to the primary clinical indication, whereas the paracrine effects of bone marrow cells may be therapeutically efficacious for limitation of remodelling or relief of angina, only cells endowed with a true cardiomyogenic differentiation potential are likely to effect regeneration of chronic scars; autologous cells are primarily limited by their variable and unpredictable functionality, thereby calling attention to banked, consistent and readily available allogeneic cell products provided the immunological issues inherent in their use can be satisfactorily addressed; regardless of the cell type, a meaningful and sustained therapeutic benefit is unlikely to occur until cell transfer and survival techniques are improved to allow greater engraftment rates; and trial end points probably need to be reassessed to focus on mechanistic issues or hard end points depending on whether new or already extensively used cells are investigated. Hopefully, these lessons may serve as a building block whose incorporation in the design of second-generation trials will help making them more clinically successful. This article is part of a special issue entitled, "Cardiovascular Stem Cells Revisited".

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a significant cause of early morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Improved organ preservation techniques will decrease ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) contributing to PGD. Adult bone marrow-derived adherent stem cells, including mesenchymal stromal (stem) cells (MSCs) and multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs), have potent anti-inflammatory actions, and we thus postulated that intratracheal MAPC administration during donor lung processing would decrease IRI. The goal of the study was therefore to determine if intratracheal MAPC instillation would decrease lung injury and inflammation in an ex vivo human lung explant model of prolonged cold storage and subsequent reperfusion. Four donor lungs not utilized for transplant underwent 8 h of cold storage (4°C). Following rewarming for approximately 30 min, non-HLA-matched allogeneic MAPCs (1 × 10(7) MAPCs/lung) were bronchoscopically instilled into the left lower lobe (LLL) and vehicle comparably instilled into the right lower lobe (RLL). The lungs were then perfused and mechanically ventilated for 4 h and subsequently assessed for histologic injury and for inflammatory markers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissue. All LLLs consistently demonstrated a significant decrease in histologic and BALF inflammation compared to vehicle-treated RLLs. These initial pilot studies suggest that use of non-HLA-matched allogeneic MAPCs during donor lung processing can decrease markers of cold ischemia-induced lung injury.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although stem cell therapy is promising for repairing damaged cardiac tissue and improving heart function, there are safety concerns, especially regarding the risk of arrhythmias, which can be life threatening. To address this issue, we propose to develop a novel screening system to evaluate arrhythmic risk associated with stem cell therapy using a high-throughput multielectrode array system that can measure conduction velocity and action potential duration in cardiomyocytes co-cultured with different types of stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells, skeletal myoblasts, and resident cardiac stem cells. We will assess the arrhythmic potential of each of these types of stem cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions, with/without application of oxidative stress or catecholamines. We hypothesize that these methods will prove to be an effective way to screen for arrhythmic risk of cardiac stem cell therapy. Ultimately, our approach can potentially be personalized to develop a robust screening protocol in order to identify which stem cell type carries the least amount of risk for arrhythmia. This system will have great clinical benefit to improve the risk/benefit ratio of human stem cell therapy for heart disease. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Medical Hypotheses 01/2015; 84(4). DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2015.01.015 · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the improved treatment of cardiovascular diseases, the population with end-stage heart failure (HF) is progressively growing. The scarcity of the gold standard therapy, heart transplantation, demands novel therapeutic approaches. For patients awaiting transplantation, ventricular-assist devices have been of great benefit on survival. To allow explantation of the assist device and obviate heart transplantation, sufficient and durable myocardial recovery is necessary. However, explant rates so far are low. Combining mechanical circulatory support with regenerative therapies such as cell (-based) therapy and biomaterials might give rise to improved long-term results. Although synergistic effects are suggested with mechanical support and stem cell therapy, evidence in both preclinical and clinical setting is lacking. This review focuses on advanced and innovative strategies for the treatment of end-stage HF and furthermore appraises clinical experience with combined strategies.
    01/2015; 2:10. DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2015.00010


Available from