Explaining heterogeneity in disability associated with current major depressive disorder: Effects of illness characteristics and comorbid mental disorders

Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Journal of Affective Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.38). 12/2010; 127(1-3):203-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.024
Source: PubMed


Although major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with disability, some persons do function well despite their illness. Aim of the present study was to examine the effect of illness characteristics and comorbid mental disorders on various aspects of disability among persons with a current MDD episode.
Data were derived from 607 participants with a current MDD based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Severity was assessed via the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms self-report (IDS-SR). For disability three outcome measures were used: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS) disability and its 7 dimensions, days out of role, and work absence. Using multiple regression analysis the effects of MDD characteristics and comorbid mental disorders were estimated.
The IDS-SR score was the best predictor of all disability outcomes. Of the comorbid mental disorders, agoraphobia was significantly associated with overall disability. Collectively, all illness characteristics accounted for 43% of variance in WHODAS disability, 13% in days out of role and 10% in work absence, suggesting substantial unexplained variance.
Only self-report measures of disability were used. There were no assessments of other diagnoses than depressive, anxiety and alcohol use disorders.
Although heterogeneity in disability of persons with current MDD is partially explained by illness characteristics of MDD (especially symptom severity) and comorbid mental disorders, most of the variance is not accounted for.

Download full-text


Available from: Johan Ormel, Oct 04, 2015
48 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with disability, yet some patients function surprisingly well. The reason for this heterogeneity between patients is unclear. Building on the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) model, this study aims to examine effects of personal and environmental characteristics on disability with MDD, over and above illness characteristics. Data were obtained from 573 patients with a current diagnosis of MDD. Three measures for disability were used, varying in objectivity and specificity: 'WHODAS disability', 'days out of role', and 'work absence'. Univariate and stepwise multivariate regression analyses were conducted. WHODAS disability was best explained by the study variables. Illness characteristics were clearly the strongest correlates of WHODAS disability, whereas personal and environmental characteristics were less influential. Personal and, more restrictedly, environmental characteristics were almost equally important to illness characteristics in explaining days out of role and work absence. High conscientiousness, high neuroticism, low level of physical activity, and high work stress were the strongest predictors of disability among MDD patients. Due to the cross-sectional design of the present study we could not draw conclusions about causal relationships between our predictor variables and disability. Personal characteristics appeared to be almost equally important to illness characteristics in explaining heterogeneity in disability when measured objectively and specifically (i.e., days out of role and work absence). However, personal characteristics turned out to be considerably less important to disability measured in a broad and subjective way (i.e., WHODAS disability). Environmental characteristics appeared to have little impact.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 02/2011; 132(1-2):71-81. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.016 · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Experimental data is presented for the flow of bentonite–water dispersions, modeled as Herschel–Bulkley fluids, for the pressure loss at different flow rates covering laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes, while flowing in concentric and fully eccentric annuli. The concentric experimental data has been compared with predictions from a recently-introduced model which covers the full flow regimes for concentric annulus, while corrections for eccentricity, previously suggested for non-Newtonian fluids, have also been used to compare with eccentric data. Laminar flow data not only from this work but also from work from the literature is very well predicted while transitional and turbulent flow data are predicted with less accuracy, requiring improvements on predicting transition points. The corrections for eccentricity work well and can be used to accurately correct concentric annulus data. Turbulent non-Newtonian flow data exhibit a power law exponent relationship between flow rate and pressure loss smaller than the Newtonian case pointing out directions for future research.
    Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 06/2011; 77(3):305-312. DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2011.04.004 · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the great burden of depression on sufferers and society, there is a lack of reliable information regarding the full range of psychosocial difficulties associated with depression and their related variables. This systematic review aimed to demonstrate the utility of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in describing the psychosocial difficulties that shape the lived experience of persons with depression. An electronic search that included publications from 2005 to 2010 in the MEDLINE and PsycHINFO databases was conducted to collect psychosocial outcomes. Quality of studies was also considered. 103 studies were included. 477 outcomes referring psychosocial difficulties were extracted and grouped into 32 ICF related categories. Emotional functions (19% of studies), followed by energy and drive (17% of studies), were the most frequent psychosocial outcomes. The onset, course, determinants, and related variables of the most important psychosocial difficulties, reported in at least 10% of studies, were described. Medication played a dual role as determinant of onset and change in some psychosocial areas, e.g. in pain, sleep, and energy and drive. The search was limited by year of publication and focused only on minor and major depression diagnoses: other depressive disorders were not included. Some underresearched, but relevant psychosocial areas could have not been analyzed. The present systematic review provides information on the psychosocial difficulties that depressive patients face in their daily lives. Future studies on depression should include outcome instruments that cover these relevant areas in order to comprehensively describe psychosocial functioning.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 12/2011; 141(1):22-33. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.009 · 3.38 Impact Factor
Show more