Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009.

HANKEN School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 06/2010; 5(6):e11273. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Internet has recently made possible the free global availability of scientific journal articles. Open Access (OA) can occur either via OA scientific journals, or via authors posting manuscripts of articles published in subscription journals in open web repositories. So far there have been few systematic studies showing how big the extent of OA is, in particular studies covering all fields of science.
The proportion of peer reviewed scholarly journal articles, which are available openly in full text on the web, was studied using a random sample of 1837 titles and a web search engine. Of articles published in 2008, 8.5% were freely available at the publishers' sites. For an additional 11.9% free manuscript versions could be found using search engines, making the overall OA percentage 20.4%. Chemistry (13%) had the lowest overall share of OA, Earth Sciences (33%) the highest. In medicine, biochemistry and chemistry publishing in OA journals was more common. In all other fields author-posted manuscript copies dominated the picture.
The results show that OA already has a significant positive impact on the availability of the scientific journal literature and that there are big differences between scientific disciplines in the uptake. Due to the lack of awareness of OA-publishing among scientists in most fields outside physics, the results should be of general interest to all scholars. The results should also interest academic publishers, who need to take into account OA in their business strategies and copyright policies, as well as research funders, who like the NIH are starting to require OA availability of results from research projects they fund. The method and search tools developed also offer a good basis for more in-depth studies as well as longitudinal studies.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Open access (OA) mandates are policies that require researchers to provide free, unrestricted access to their published research by including it in OA journals (gold OA) or depositing it in freely available disciplinary or institutional repositories (green OA). This study measures the degree of compliance with a Spanish government OA mandate 2.5 years after its implementation. A total of 58.4% of articles resulting from publicly funded research had at least one OA copy available 1 year after publication. Among these, 23.8% were in gold OA, 21.8% in green OA and 12.8% in gray OA, i.e., posted on websites and social networks. Most of the green OA articles were in 2 disciplinary repositories: arXiv and PubMed Central. Just 14.4% of the articles resulting from publicly funded research were available in institutional repositories, although more than 90% of the articles in the data set were the result of projects carried out at institutions that have such an archive. There is great potential for growth in green OA, because over two thirds of the articles that were not available as OA were published in journals whose publishers allow a preprint or a postprint copy to be deposited.
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 02/2015; DOI:10.1002/asi.23422 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines the trends in publication and citation of Galemys, the scientific journal of the Spanish Society of Mammalogist (SECEM) in the last 15 years. We reviewed the citations obtained in the 38 issues of Galemys published between 1997 and 2012 in journals covered by the Journal Citation Reports, as well as in the journal itself. As a whole, 425 articles have been published in Galemys (296 articles and 129 short notes), with an average of 26.5 ± 13.2 (SD) items / year. There have been 596 citations to 408 articles and notes published in Galemys, both in international journals (349 citations, 58.6%) and in the journal itself (247 citations, 41.4%). The average impact of Galemys in the period 1997-2012 was 0.09 citations/year, with a five-years impact factor of 0.15 citations/year, and with a halflife of 7.5 years. Galemys is currently only moderately used by the scientific community, but patterns of use are growing, especially by the Spanish mammalogists linked to the SECEM. Its potential for future use and larger impacts is probably high. This suggestion is sustained on results obtained on recent trends, together with the expected effect of the lasts changes in the journal, especially its open access publication an identification with a DOI and their inclusion in the CrossRef database.
    12/2014; 26:85-90. DOI:10.7325/Galemys.2014.A9
  • Croatian Medical Journal 08/2013; 54(4):315-318. DOI:10.3325/cmj.2013.54.315 · 1.37 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014