Quantifying the Performance of Individual Players in a Team Activity

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 06/2010; 5(6):e10937. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010937
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Teamwork is a fundamental aspect of many human activities, from business to art and from sports to science. Recent research suggest that team work is of crucial importance to cutting-edge scientific research, but little is known about how teamwork leads to greater creativity. Indeed, for many team activities, it is not even clear how to assign credit to individual team members. Remarkably, at least in the context of sports, there is usually a broad consensus on who are the top performers and on what qualifies as an outstanding performance.
In order to determine how individual features can be quantified, and as a test bed for other team-based human activities, we analyze the performance of players in the European Cup 2008 soccer tournament. We develop a network approach that provides a powerful quantification of the contributions of individual players and of overall team performance.
We hypothesize that generalizations of our approach could be useful in other contexts where quantification of the contributions of individual team members is important.

Download full-text


Available from: Luís A Nunes Amaral, Jun 20, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paper presents a model that can be used to identify the goal scoring ability of footballers. By decomposing the scoring process into the generation of shots and the conversion of shots to goals, abilities can be estimated from two mixed effects models. We compare several versions of our model as a tool for predicting the number of goals that a player will score in the following season with that of a naive method whereby a player's goals‐per‐minute ratio is assumed to be constant from one season to the next. We find that our model outperforms the naive model and that this outperformance can be attributed, in some part, to the model's disaggregating a player's ability and chance that may have influenced his goal scoring statistic in the previous season.
    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 02/2014; 177(2). DOI:10.1111/rssa.12015 · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We introduce a new kind of percolation on finite graphs called jigsaw percolation. This model attempts to capture networks of people who innovate by merging ideas and who solve problems by piecing together solutions. Each person in a social network has a unique piece of a jigsaw puzzle. Acquainted people with compatible puzzle pieces merge their puzzle pieces. More generally, groups of people with merged puzzle pieces merge if the groups know one another and have a pair of compatible puzzle pieces. The social network solves the puzzle if it eventually merges all the puzzle pieces. For an Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi social network with $n$ vertices and edge probability $p_n$, we define the critical value $p_c(n)$ for a connected puzzle graph to be the $p_n$ for which the chance of solving the puzzle equals 1/2. We prove that for the $n$-cycle (ring) puzzle, $p_c(n) = \Theta(1/\log n)$, and for an arbitrary connected puzzle graph with bounded maximum degree, $p_c(n) = O(1/\log n)$ and $\omega(1/n^b)$ for any $b>0$. Surprisingly, with high probability, social networks with a power law degree distribution cannot solve any bounded-degree puzzle. This model suggests a mechanism for recent empirical claims that innovation increases with social density, and it begins to show what social networks stifle creativity and what networks collectively innovate.
    The Annals of Applied Probability 07/2012; 25(4). DOI:10.1214/14-AAP1041 · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We selectively review the literature from the fields of organizational behavior and sport science with the overarching purpose of identifying and summarizing key themes and contributions. The literature is used to provide insights into the fundamental issues of competition (getting ahead) and cooperation (getting along) in organizations. Studies from the organization sciences that have incorporated individual and team data from the various fields of sport are reviewed and organized by topic into succession effects, motivation and performance, and studies of individual and team performance changes over time. In addition, selected studies from the sport science literature are reviewed from the topic areas of the “hot-hand” effect, choking under pressure, passion for life activities, and difficult career transitions. The evidence presents a clear argument that greater integration across the fields of organization and sport science is needed. Areas of future research consideration with regard to embodied cognition and emotions as well as networked approaches to team processes are proposed.
    The Academy of Management Annals 06/2012; DOI:10.1080/19416520.2012.678697 · 7.33 Impact Factor